Cases

MEMORANDUM ** In these consolidated appeals, James Frank Berry appeals from the district court’s 2012 judgment revoking supervised release and imposing an 11-mqnth sentence, and the 2013 judgment revoking supervised release and imposing an 18-*832month sentence. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (

316 B.R. 883 (2004) M.L. BERRY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. PHARMACIA CORPORATION f/k/a Monsanto Chemical Company, et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A.3.04 CV 134LN. United States District Court, S.D. Mississippi, Jackson Division. September 29, 2004. *884 Paul A. Koerber, Roger K. Doolittle, Doolittle and Doolittle, Thomas R. Frazier, II,

464 F.Supp.2d 751 (2006) Akeem ALEXANDER, Jerry Alexander, and Susie Alexander, Plaintiffs, v. KAPPA ALPHA PSI FRATERNITY, INC., et al., Defendants. No. 3:05-0651. United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division. November 29, 2006. *752 James B. Johnson, Samuel Flint Miller, Stites & Harbison, PLLC, Nashville

In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana No. 06-12-00133-CR JAMES NATHAN ALEXANDER, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 188th District Court Gregg County, Texas Trial Court No. 40028-A Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Justice Carter

LUCERO, Circuit Judge, dissenting, with whom SEYMOUR, Circuit Judge, joins. No case in my tenure on the court could be more compellingly described as meeting the Rule 35 en banc standard of presenting a “question of exceptional importance” deserving the attention of the entire court than this. In one of the more shameful events in our nation’s history, over two hundred African-Americans were slaughtered and a

TACHA, Chief Circuit Judge. On May 31, 1921, and following into the next day, violent attacks destroyed the African-American community of Greenwood, Oklahoma. An angry white mob converged on Greenwood in a devastating assault, burning homes and businesses, killing up to three hundred people, and leaving thousands homeless. In February 2003, Plaintiffs-Appellants, all Riot survivors or descendants of survivors, filed suit a

OPINION ROBINSON, Judge: This matter is before the Court-on both Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss and Supplemental Motion to Dismiss, the basis for each being that the Complaint should be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to RUSCC 12(b)(1).1 Plaintiff, Sylvester Berry, seeks damages, including back pay, benefits, and reinstatement to the United States Mar

ON RECONSIDERATION. 1 Melody J. Stewart, Judge. {¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant, Robert Berry, brought suit against his supervisor, defendant-appellee James Lupica, and their employer, defendant-appellee Wacho-via Securities, alleging that Wachovia had breac

Judgment rendered March 1, 2023. Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by Art. 922, La. C. Cr. P. No. 54,947-KA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA ***** STATE OF LOUISIANA

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2002-CA-01431-SCT JAMES ALEXANDER v. TAMMY WOMACK, BETTY CATCHINGS, MAELEANER BENSON, ELZIE MAE BERRY, DENNIE TAYLOR, CURTIS RAY TAYLOR, DARRON TAYLOR, DONNELL TAYLOR, JR. AND WILLIE RAY TAYLOR CONSOLIDATED WITH NO. 2002-CA-01437-SCT JAMES ALEXANDER v. WILLIE BOYCE DAVIS CONSOLIDATED WITH NO. 2002-CA-01440-

326 S.E.2d 288 (1985) Lucille B. TUNNELL, John M. Berry, Jr., Henry Clay Berry, Merlin S. Berry, Velma A. Berry, Landreth W. Berry, Kay Berry Young, Frances C. Barbour, Mrs. Edward W. Cahoon, Evelyn Ann Croley, Phillip S. Harris, Elizabeth C. La Voy, Nicholas D. Harris, Marietta C. Heobeat, Clary Weston, Wade Swindell, Ella S. Berry, Nell Grace Berry, Reuben W. Berry, Jr., William C. Berry, Leona Berry Lupton, Carlos Berry, Jr., Samuel G. Jones, Jr., Wil

OPINION MARK R. HORNAK, District Judge. The question before the Court is whether it has subject matter jurisdiction to entertain a lawsuit on behalf of federal retirees who assert that the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) is deliberately refusing to properly pay them the annuities to which OPM has conceded they are statutorily entitled, or whether their grievance instead must be channeled o

RE, Chief Judge: Petitioner-appellant, Alexander Allen, Jr., appeals from an order of the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts which denied his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Alleging that he was denied a fair trial in violation of the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, and t

[Cite as Berry v. Lupica, 2011-Ohio-3462.] [Vacated opinion. Please see 2011-Ohio-5381.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 95393 ROBERT BERRY PLAINTIFF

ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judge: It was a scene right out of a Hollywood movie. On August 21, 2010, after more than a month of planning, teams from the Orange County Sheriffs Office descended on multiple target locations. They blocked the entrances and exits to the parking lots so no one could leave and no one could enter. With some team members dressed in ballistic vests and masks, and with guns

08/26/2021 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON March 3, 2021 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. JAMES MCCLAIN Appeal from the Circuit Court for Madison County No. 19-214 Kyle Atkins, Judge No. W2019-01217-CCA-R3-CD The defendan

KANNE, Circuit Judge. Michael Alexander alleges that a local prosecutor, Mark McKinney, conspired with a number of agents from the Federal Bureau of Investigation to manufacture false evidence and bring trumped-up charges of conspiracy to commit bribery against him. A jury acquitted Alexander of the charges, and he then brought suit against McKinney for violating his due process

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER PAUL W. GREENE, United States Magistrate Judge. This case arises from events related to the shooting death of Mr. Emerson Cray-ton, Jr., who was allegedly shot and killed by Defendant Tommy Maness, a police officer employed by Defendant the City of Alexander City, Alabama. The Plaintiffs allege that Defendant Maness shot Mr. Crayton five or six times while Crayto

Per Curiam: This is an original proceeding in discipline filed by the office of the Disciplinary Administrator against Cortland E. Berry, of Newton, an attorney admitted to the practice of law in Kansas. Complaints filed against the respondent alleged that the respondent violated KRPC 1.1 (2001 Kan. Ct. Annot. 312) (competence); KRPC 1.3 (2001 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 323) (diligence); KRPC 1.4 (2001 Kan

12/27/2023 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE August 15, 2023 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. WILLIAM JAMES ANDREWS Appeal from the Circuit Court for Williamson County No. M-CR210102 James G. Martin, III, Judge __________________