Cases

*1102In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Flaherty, J.), dated July 20, 2009, which granted the motion of the defendant Jacqueline Riley for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against her. Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the motion

Basile v Riley (2020 NY Slip Op 06600) Basile v Riley 2020 NY Slip Op 06600 Decided on November 13, 2020 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law §

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 16-10150 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 2:96-cr-00464- DLR-4 RILEY BRIONES, JR., AKA Unknown Spitz, Defendant-Appellant. OPINION Appeal from the United States District Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER VIRGINIA EMERSON HOPKINS, United States District Judge This 'civil action has been filed by 44 'individual Plaintiffs1 who allege that the Defendant, HMR of Alabama, Inc. d/b/a Robert L. Howard Veterans Home (“HMR”) has violated the Fair Labor Standards Act,' 29 Ü.S.C. §§ 201-219 (the “FLSA”),' by failing to pay required overtime to them when they w

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER MARK E. FULLER, Chief Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Eleven named plaintiffs seek to represent a class of disabled persons. The Defendants are Bob Riley, as Governor of the State of Alabama, John Houston, as Commissioner of Mental Health and Mental Retardation, and The Alabama Department of Mental Health and Mental Retardation. Plaintiffs challenge the w

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 15-2053 Filed March 22, 2017 MARY BATINICH as PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE of the ESTATE of ALEX BATINICH, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. ARTHUR RENANDER, Defendant-Appellant, vs. JACQUELINE ZARA RENANDER and RAI, LLC, Defendants. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Johnson County, Mary E

*244MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ANN ALDRICH, District Judge. Pending before the Court in the above actions are plaintiffs’ Motions for Class Certification, pursuant to Rule 23, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Wolfson v. Riley (Wolfson) was originally filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. Po

John M. Keane, S. Donald M. Riley was struck by an automobile and fatally injured on June 14, 1963. His last will and testament was duly admitted to probate by this court on November 20, 1963. Letters of administration c. t. a. were issued to *659Elizabeth Biley, guardian of two infant residuary legatees. In this proceeding the representative seeks leave to compr

OPINION OF THE COURT NeMoyer, J. We hold that County Law § 308 (4) poses no obstacle to the court-ordered discovery of 911 records in a civil lawsuit. Facts An unusually intense winter storm stranded plaintiff’s decedent inside his vehicle during the early morning hours of November 18, 2014, in the Town o

61 N.J. 218 (1972) 294 A.2d 7 ALFRED RILEY AND ALBERTA RILEY, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL PERSONS SIMILARLY SITUATED, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. NEW RAPIDS CARPET CENTER, A NEW YORK CORPORATION; IDEAL DESIGNS, INC., A NEW YORK CORPORATION; AND CHARGE ACCOUNT FACTORS, INC., A NEW YORK CORPORATION, SUED INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES. The Supreme

GRUENDER, Circuit Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part. Because I believe the district court abused its discretion by failing to address the issue of forum shopping in its grant of voluntary dismissal, I respectfully dissent from the bulk of the court’s opinion. While I would find it unnecessary to reach the alternative question of whether the district court likew

RITA W. GRUBER, Judge. 1 Appellant Xavier Thomas was convicted by a jury of first-degree murder and attempted first-degree murder and sentenced to 44 years’ imprisonment. On appeal, appellant contends that the trial court erred in (1) denying his motion for directed verdict; (2) finding that the door had been opened to allow the State to cross-examine him

793 N.E.2d 1063 (2003) OLCOTT INTERNATIONAL & CO., INC., Appellant-Cross-Appellee, v. MICRO DATA BASE SYSTEMS, INC., Appellee-Cross-Appellant. No. 79A05-0211-CV-544. Court of Appeals of Indiana. August 19, 2003. *1068 David Feinsilver, The Feinsilver Law Group, P.C., Millburn, NJ, Jacqueline Chosnek, Pearlman Chosnek & Ho

ORDER MIRANDA M. DU, District Judge. Before the Court is a case of first impression for this District. Defendants Harvey A. Bookstein, a California Accountancy Corporation, Harvey A. Bookstein, an individual, HAR-Airport, LLC, HAR-San Jacinto Partners, LLC, HAR-Bronson Diversified, LLC, and HAR-SJS Partner, LCC’s (the “Bookstein Defendants”) filed this Motion for Withdrawal of the Reference with Regard to Ad

ORDER PATRICK J. SCHILTZ, District Judge. Plaintiff Paul Gunderson is a former employee of defendant BNSF Railway Company (“BNSF”). Gunderson brings this action under the whistleblower provision of the Federal Rail Safety Act-(“FRSA”), 49 U.S.C. § 20109, alleging that he was harassed and terminated from his job in retaliation for reporting safety violations and filing a personal-injury report. BNSF mov

983 F.Supp. 731 (1997) EVERGREEN MEDIA CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. RADIO & TELEVISION BROADCAST ENGINEERS, LOCAL UNION NUMBER 1220 of the BROTHERHOOD of ELECTRICAL WORKERS, Defendant. No. 96 C 6661. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. October 15, 1997. *732 Dean A. Dickie, Jacqueline E. Kalk, D'Ancon

OPINION DAMON J. KEITH, Circuit Judge. Various members of the Strieker family appeal a grant of summary judgment for Defendants on their § 1983 claims. Local and state police officers responded to a 911 call from Susan Strieker requesting help for her son, Andrew, who was suffering from an apparent drug overdose. Consistent with policy requirements, poli

HEANEY, Circuit Judge, dissenting. The majority decision is very narrow, holding that the mandatory class action certified by the court below violates the Anti-Injunction Act. It is clear, as the majority recognizes, that the Act would not be contravened by an opt-out class action. On remand, the district court should consider whether such an opt-out class is appropriate. I dissent, non

638 F.3d 594 (2011) MORRISON ENTERPRISES, LLC, Plaintiff/Appellant, City of Hastings, Nebraska, Plaintiff, v. DRAVO CORPORATION, Defendant/Appellee. United States, Amicus on Behalf of Appellee. Morrison Enterprises, LLC, Plaintiff, City of Hastings, Nebraska, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Dravo Corporation, Defendant/Appellee. United States, Amicus on Behalf of Appellee. Nos. 10-1468, 10-1469.

DECISION AND ORDER ELIZABETH A. WOLFORD, District Judge. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Christina Costa (“Plaintiff’) brings this retaliation action against De*338fendants Sears Home Improvement Products, Inc. (“SHIP”), and Sears Holdings Corporation (collectively, “Defendants”) pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act o