Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Jacqueline Kristie Andrews”
in Re Eduardo Del Pinopublic domain
Opinion issued March 4, 2021 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-20-00674-CV ——————————— IN RE EDUARDO DEL PINO, SPRING DEL PINO, ROBERT RUGGLES, GLORIA RUGGLES, ROBERT DAWKINS, DEMETRIA DAWKINS, EDDIE DELANEY, JENNIFER DELANEY, LEROY DELK, CAROLE DELK, MARTI
United States v. State of Californiapublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 26-926 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 2:25-cv-10999- CAS-AJR v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA; GAVIN OPINION NEWSOM, Governor of California, in his Official Capacity; ROB BONTA, Attorney Gener
DATE: 03/13/2017 PENNSYLVANIA CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION PAGE: 1 TIME: 14:23:09 NON-COMPLIANT LAWYERS USER ID: jilgenfr ACTIVE REPORT: ctrk_crt SORT BY : COUNTY CODE, LAWYER LAST NAME CRITERIA: COMPLIANCE YEAR END DATE = 08312016 GROUP 2, REINST FEE ASSESSED ________________________________________________________
Texas Department of Public Safety v. Tannerpublic domain
928 S.W.2d 731 (1996) TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY and David Hullum, In His Individual Capacity, Appellants, v. David TANNER and Mary Schermerhorn, Individually, and Van Horn, Inc. a/k/a World of Products Cooperative and d/b/a Schermerhorn's, Appellees. No. 04-95-00389-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, San Antonio. August 21, 1996. *7
San Jacinto River Authority v. Andy Raypublic domain
Reversed and Rendered and Memorandum Opinion filed May 27, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-19-00095-CV SAN JACINTO RIVER AUTHORITY, Appellant V. ANDY RAY, ET AL., Appellees1 On Appeal from the 125th District Court H
Williams v. Goverpublic domain
490 F.3d 785 Danny L. WILLIAMS; Beverly A. Clark-Miller; Freddie A. Gramps, Jr.; Carrie Jean Pedrini-Pierson; Christine Marie Dobis; Cindy Lusk Wicklander; Claudia Gramps; Gary Lee Seek; Jacqueline Marie Conn; Davida E. Gramps; Julia Jarvis Wicklander; Lavonne Tracy Woods Gramps; Lawrence Ira Seek; Rhonda Leann Corkin; Richard Wicklander; Ricky Dale Gramps; Ronald Seek; Rose Shumard Wicklander; Roxanne Gramps; Russell D. Gramps; Susanne Gramps; Ter
Williams v. Goverpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DANNY L. WILLIAMS; BEVERLY A. CLARK-MILLER; FREDDIE A. GRAMPS, JR.; CARRIE JEAN PEDRINI- PIERSON; CHRISTINE MARIE DOBIS; CINDY LUSK WICKLANDER; CLAUDIA GRAMPS; GARY LEE SEEK; JACQUELINE MARIE CONN; DAVIDA E. GRAMPS; JULIA JARVIS WICKLANDER; LAVONNE TRACY WOODS GRAMPS; LAWRENCE IRA SEEK; RHONDA LEANN CORKIN; RICHARD WICKLANDER; RICKY DALE GRAMPS; RONALD SEEK; ROSE No. 04-17482 SHUM
Huyer v. Wells Fargo & Co.public domain
ORDER ROBERT W. PRATT, U.S. DISTRICT COURT Before the Court are two motions: (1) Plaintiffs’ Motion for Final Approval of Class Action Settlement Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23 (Clerk’s No. 262); and (2)Plaintiffs’ Motion for Attorneys’ Fees, Reimbursement of Litigation Expenses, and Class Representative Service Awards (Clerk’s No. 263). A fairness hearing was held on January 21, 2016. Clerk’
Mooring v. Brownpublic domain
763 F.2d 386 Dwight Lee MOORING and Kristie Lou Mooring, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.Andrew Jennings BROWN, Jr. and California First Bank, asCo-Trustees Under the Will of Ione GilfillanBrown, Defendants-Appellees. No. 83-1315. United States Court of Appeals,Tenth Circuit. May 28, 1985. 1 <
Kimetra Brice v. Haynes Investments, LLCpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT KIMETRA BRICE; EARL BROWNE; JILL No. 19-15707 NOVOROT, Plaintiffs-Appellees, D.C. No. 3:18-cv-01200- v. WHO PLAIN GREEN, LLC, Defendant, OPINION and HAYNES INVESTMENTS, LLC; L. STEPHEN HAYNES, Defendants-Appellants. Ap
Rosiles-Perez v. Superior Forestry Service, Inc.public domain
*334 MEMORANDUM WILLIAM J. HAYNES, JR., District Judge. Plaintiffs Jose Rosiles-Perez, Jesus Santiago-Salmoran and Hector Ortiz-Mora individually1, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, filed this action under the Migrant and Seasonal Agricultural Worker Protection Act, 29 U.S.C. § 1801 et seq.
Brice v. Plain Green, LLC.public domain
DISCUSSION I. MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION The Haynes defendants move to compel arbitration, arguing that I should enforce arbitration agreements that each of the named plaintiffs signed as part of their loan agreements. In addition, to the extent plaintiffs challenge the enforceability of their arbitration agreements, the Haynes defendants argue those challenges should be decided by the ar
Freeman v. HSBC Holdings PLCpublic domain
19-3970 Freeman v. HSBC Holdings PLC United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit August Term 2020 Argued: February 1, 2021 Decided: January 5, 2023 No. 19-3970 CHARLOTTE FREEMAN, for the Estate of BRIAN S. FREEMAN, KATHLEEN SNYDER, RANDOLPH FREEMAN,
Werlinger v. Champion Healthcare Corp.public domain
NEUMANN, Justice. [¶ 1] Champion Healthcare Corporation, Paracelsus Healthcare Corporation (collectively “Champion Healthcare”), and Dakota Medical Foundation (“Dakota Medical”) appeal from the district court’s order granting class certification under Rule 23, N.D.R.Civ.P. We remand with instructions. I [¶ 2] On November 1, 1996, Sister Colette Werlinger, and others similarly situated
In Re SmileDirectClub, Inc. Securities Litigationpublic domain
03/18/2022 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE December 2, 2021 Session IN RE SMILEDIRECTCLUB, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION Appeal from the Chancery Court for Davidson County No. 19-1169-IV Russell T. Perkins, Chancellor ___________________________________
Mooring v. Brownpublic domain
EARL E. O’CONNOR, District Judge. This is an appeal from a final order denying plaintiffs declaratory and injunctive relief from the effect of defendants’ prior judgment lien against real estate that included plaintiffs’ residence built after the judgment lien was recorded. On stipulated facts, the district court found that the judgment lien was superior in right to plaintiffs’ interests in the property. We affirm.
If this opinion indicates that it is “FOR PUBLICATION,” it is subject to revision until final publication in the Michigan Appeals Reports. STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS DAVID KRIEGER, ANDREW KRIEGER, JAMES FOR PUBLICATION SPERLING, and MARGARET SPERLING, on September 7, 2023 Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly 9:05 a.m. Si
Jihad Adbul-Mumit v. Alexandria Hyundai, LLCpublic domain
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1582 JIHAD ADBUL-MUMIT; MATTHEW ABEDI; MONICA ADAIR SARGENT; MARK AGEE; ALIZ AGOSTON; YVONNE ALSTON; DAN AMATRUDA; KRISTY AMBROSE; KIMBERLEY AMICK; WANDA G. AMOS; CHRISTOPHER ARAUZA; CARL ARSENAULT; BROOKE ASHER; MICHELLE ATKINS; RAYMOND O. ATKINS; MATTHEW ATWELL; DAVID AUB; SOHA AYYASH; ASIF AZIZ; SUSAN BAILEY; KAREN BAKER; HAB BA
Accuracy Firearms, LLC v. Pritzkerpublic domain
2023 IL App (5th) 230035 NOTICE Decision filed 01/31/23. The text of this decision may be NO. 5-23-0035 changed or corrected prior to the filing of a Peti ion for Rehearing or the disposition of IN THE the same. APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIFTH DISTRICT _______________________________________________________________
Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a (2022 NY Slip Op 05127) Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a 2022 NY Slip Op 05127 Decided on September 1, 2022 Appellate Division, Third Department Published