⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Jacobs v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.”

District Court, D. South Carolina · 2003-10-02 · Published · cited 0× · 219 F.R.D. 375; 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25146; 2003 WL 22940579
ORDER CURRIE, District Judge. The three above captioned class actions, which have been consolidated for purposes of pretrial proceedings, came before the court on September 23, 2003, for a fairness hearing to consider proposed class settlements.1 A fairness hearing is required by Fed.R.Civ.P. 23(e) which governs approval of settlements of class actions,2
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2025-08-01 · Published · cited 0×
USCA4 Appeal: 23-2301 Doc: 61 Filed: 08/01/2025 Pg: 1 of 26 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 23-2301 DARRELL J. AUSTIN, JR., Plaintiff - Appellee, v. EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC., De
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2024-10-17 · Published · cited 40× · 119 F.4th 314
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _______________ No. 23-2953 _______________ MEGHAN YOUNG, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC., Appellant _______________ On Appeal from the United States
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2023-10-06 · Published · cited 0×
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _________________ No. 21-2430 _________________ STEFAN INGRAM, Appellant v. EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.; EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC; WAYPOINT RESOURCE GROUP, LLC; COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS, LLC ___________
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2023-10-02 · Published · cited 12× · 83 F.4th 231
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _________________ No. 21-2430 _________________ STEFAN INGRAM, Appellant v. EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.; EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC; WAYPOINT RESOURCE GROUP, LLC; COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS, LLC ___________
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001-07-25 · Published · cited 7× · 261 F.3d 179; 59 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1639; 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 16706
STRAUB, Circuit Judge: Plaintiff-AppellanWCross-Appellee County of Suffolk, New York (“Suffolk County”) appeals from an opinion and order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (John F. Keenan, Judge) granting Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant First American Real Estate Solutions’s (“First American”) motion for reconsideration and dismissing Suffolk County’s complaint in its entirety f
District Court, E.D. California · 2019-05-08 · Published · cited 36× · 380 F. Supp. 3d 998
Anthony W. Ishii, SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE *1006In 2009, Plaintiffs, as purported class representatives, brought claims against Defendants DairyAmerica and California Dairies concerning the misreporting of milk prices. ECF No. 1. In September 2018, the parties notified the Court of their intent to settle. ECF No. 552. Plaintif
Noll v. eBay, Inc.public domain
District Court, N.D. California · 2015-09-15 · Published · cited 3× · 309 F.R.D. 593; 92 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1150; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 123147; 2015 WL 5442647
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION; GRANTING MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS EDWARD J. DAVILA, United States District Judge Plaintiffs Richard Noll (“Noll”) and Rhythm Motor Sports, LLC (“Rhythm”) (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) bring this is a putative class action against Defendant eBay, Inc., (“Defendant”) regarding the recurring fees for the Good ’Til Cancelled (“GTC”) listings
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001-07-25 · Published · cited 19× · 261 F.3d 179
261 F.3d 179 (2nd Cir. 2001) COUNTY OF SUFFOLK, NEW YORK, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee,v.FIRST AMERICAN REAL ESTATE SOLUTIONS, Defendant Appellee-Cross-Appellant,EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC., doing business as Experian, doing business as Experian Real Estate Solutions, TRW REDI PROPERTY DATA, also known as Information Systems and Services, Inc., Defendants. Docket Nos. 00-9011(L), 00-9169(XAP)
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2020-10-28 · Published · cited 0×
USCA11 Case: 16-16486 Date Filed: 10/28/2020 Page: 1 of 148 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 16-16486 & 16-16783 ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 0:15-cv-60716-WPD DR. DAVID S.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019-12-20 · Published · cited 47× · 945 F.3d 83
18-0869-cv (L) Congregation Rabbinical College of Tartikov, Inc. v. Village of Pomona 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 2 FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT 3 _____________ 4 5 August Term 2018 6 7 (Argued: April 18, 2019 | Decided: December 20, 2019) 8 9 Docket Nos. 18-0869-cv(L), 18-1062-cv(XAP) 10 11 CONGREGATION RABBI
District Court, S.D. Florida · 2013-05-09 · Published · cited 4× · 946 F. Supp. 2d 1321; 2013 WL 2303764
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS ROBERT N. SCOLA, JR., District Judge. This is primarily an antitrust case. Plaintiff Duty Free Americas, Inc. (DFA) operates duty-free stores in airports and one of the main products it carries is beauty products. Defendant The Estee Lauder Companies, Inc. (ELC) supplies many duty-free stores with its beauty products, but it no longer deals with DFA. DFA allege
District Court, E.D. New York · 2005-10-17 · Published · cited 2× · 396 F. Supp. 2d 280; 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25357; 2005 WL 2659087
396 F.Supp.2d 280 (2005) WYETH, Plaintiff, v. KING PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., Defendant. No. 04CV4068 (SLT/RML). United States District Court, E.D. New York. October 17, 2005. *281 *282 *283 Bruce S. Kaplan, Emily A. Stubbs, Friedman, Kaplan, Seiler & Adelm
District Court, District of Columbia · 2014-09-25 · Published · cited 24× · 69 F. Supp. 3d 175; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 135130; 2014 WL 4759945
Re Document Nos.: 114, 116, 119, 128 MEMORANDUM OPINION Granting In Part and Denying In Part Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment; Granting In Part and Denying In Part Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment; Denying Defendant’s Motion to Strike; and Denying Plaintiffs’ Motion In Limine RUDOLPH CONTRERAS,
District Court, District of Columbia · 2001-04-30 · Published · cited 52× · 145 F. Supp. 2d 6; 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9901
145 F.Supp.2d 6 (2001) INDIVIDUAL REFERENCE SERVICES GROUP, INC., Plaintiff, v. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, et al., Defendants. Trans Union LLC, Plaintiff, v. Federal Trade Commission, et al., Defendants. Nos. CIV.A. 00-1828 ESH, CIV.A. 00-2087 ESH. United States District Court, District of Columbia. April 30, 2001. *7
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2025-08-25 · Published · cited 0×
USCA4 Appeal: 24-1684 Doc: 69 Filed: 08/25/2025 Pg: 1 of 27 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 24-1684 LYNN FREEMAN, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. PROGRESSIVE DIRECT
District Court, D. Maryland · 2015-08-04 · Published · cited 11× · 118 F. Supp. 3d 867; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 101663; 2015 WL 4647944
MEMORANDUM OPINION RÍbHARD D. BENNETT, District Judge. This action arises out of alleged violations of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (“FCRA”), 15 U.S.C. § 1681 et seq., and other state law claims relating to Plaintiff Marceline White’s (“Plaintiff’ or .‘White”) residential mortgage. Currently pending before this Court are Defendant Green Tree Servicing, LLC’s (“Defendant” or “Green Tree”
Sanford v. Russellpublic domain
District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2019-05-15 · Published · cited 5× · 381 F. Supp. 3d 905
DAVID M. LAWSON, United States District Judge The Court issues this corrected opinion and order to correct certain non-substantive errors in the original. *910Defendants Michael Russell and James Tolbert move for a summary judgment of dismissal of all claims brought against them by plaintiff Davontae Sanford. Sanford alleged in
United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2009-08-06 · Published · cited 0× · 641 F. Supp. 2d 1382; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 107146; 2009 WL 2412130
641 F.Supp.2d 1382 (2009) In re PUBLIC RECORDS COLLECTION FAIR CREDIT REPORTING ACT (FCRA) LITIGATION. No. MDL 2071. United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. August 6, 2009. Before ROBERT L. MILLER, JR., Acting Chairman, JOHN G. HEYBURN II, Chairman *, KATHRYN H. VRATIL, DAVID R. HANSEN, W. ROYAL FURGESON, JR. and FRANK C. DAMRELL, JR., Judges of the Panel.
District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2007-07-20 · Published · cited 9× · 497 F. Supp. 2d 847; 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 53197; 2007 WL 2137788
497 F.Supp.2d 847 (2007) Larry TALLON, Plaintiff v. LLOYD & McDANIEL et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 3:06CV-314-H. United States District Court, W.D. Kentucky, Louisville Division. July 20, 2007. *848 Ellen G. Friedman, Louisville, KY, Stephen R. Felson, Cincinnati, OH, Steven C. Shane, Bellevue, KY, for Plaintiff. <