Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Jacobs v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.”
Clark v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.public domain
ORDER CURRIE, District Judge. The three above captioned class actions, which have been consolidated for purposes of pretrial proceedings, came before the court on September 23, 2003, for a fairness hearing to consider proposed class settlements.1 A fairness hearing is required by Fed.R.Civ.P. 23(e) which governs approval of settlements of class actions,2
USCA4 Appeal: 23-2301 Doc: 61 Filed: 08/01/2025 Pg: 1 of 26 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 23-2301 DARRELL J. AUSTIN, JR., Plaintiff - Appellee, v. EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC., De
Meghan Young v. Experian Information Solutions Incpublic domain
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _______________ No. 23-2953 _______________ MEGHAN YOUNG, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC., Appellant _______________ On Appeal from the United States
Stefan Ingram v. Experian Information Solutionspublic domain
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _________________ No. 21-2430 _________________ STEFAN INGRAM, Appellant v. EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.; EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC; WAYPOINT RESOURCE GROUP, LLC; COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS, LLC ___________
Stefan Ingram v. Experian Information Solutionspublic domain
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _________________ No. 21-2430 _________________ STEFAN INGRAM, Appellant v. EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.; EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC; WAYPOINT RESOURCE GROUP, LLC; COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS, LLC ___________
STRAUB, Circuit Judge: Plaintiff-AppellanWCross-Appellee County of Suffolk, New York (“Suffolk County”) appeals from an opinion and order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (John F. Keenan, Judge) granting Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant First American Real Estate Solutions’s (“First American”) motion for reconsideration and dismissing Suffolk County’s complaint in its entirety f
Carlin v. DairyAmerica, Inc.public domain
Anthony W. Ishii, SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE *1006In 2009, Plaintiffs, as purported class representatives, brought claims against Defendants DairyAmerica and California Dairies concerning the misreporting of milk prices. ECF No. 1. In September 2018, the parties notified the Court of their intent to settle. ECF No. 552. Plaintif
Noll v. eBay, Inc.public domain
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION; GRANTING MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS EDWARD J. DAVILA, United States District Judge Plaintiffs Richard Noll (“Noll”) and Rhythm Motor Sports, LLC (“Rhythm”) (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) bring this is a putative class action against Defendant eBay, Inc., (“Defendant”) regarding the recurring fees for the Good ’Til Cancelled (“GTC”) listings
261 F.3d 179 (2nd Cir. 2001) COUNTY OF SUFFOLK, NEW YORK, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee,v.FIRST AMERICAN REAL ESTATE SOLUTIONS, Defendant Appellee-Cross-Appellant,EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC., doing business as Experian, doing business as Experian Real Estate Solutions, TRW REDI PROPERTY DATA, also known as Information Systems and Services, Inc., Defendants. Docket Nos. 00-9011(L), 00-9169(XAP)
Dr. David S. Muransky v. Godiva Chocolatier, Inc.public domain
USCA11 Case: 16-16486 Date Filed: 10/28/2020 Page: 1 of 148 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 16-16486 & 16-16783 ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 0:15-cv-60716-WPD DR. DAVID S.
18-0869-cv (L) Congregation Rabbinical College of Tartikov, Inc. v. Village of Pomona 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 2 FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT 3 _____________ 4 5 August Term 2018 6 7 (Argued: April 18, 2019 | Decided: December 20, 2019) 8 9 Docket Nos. 18-0869-cv(L), 18-1062-cv(XAP) 10 11 CONGREGATION RABBI
Duty Free Americas, Inc. v. Estée Lauder Companiespublic domain
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS ROBERT N. SCOLA, JR., District Judge. This is primarily an antitrust case. Plaintiff Duty Free Americas, Inc. (DFA) operates duty-free stores in airports and one of the main products it carries is beauty products. Defendant The Estee Lauder Companies, Inc. (ELC) supplies many duty-free stores with its beauty products, but it no longer deals with DFA. DFA allege
Wyeth v. King Pharmaceuticals, Inc.public domain
396 F.Supp.2d 280 (2005) WYETH, Plaintiff, v. KING PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., Defendant. No. 04CV4068 (SLT/RML). United States District Court, E.D. New York. October 17, 2005. *281 *282 *283 Bruce S. Kaplan, Emily A. Stubbs, Friedman, Kaplan, Seiler & Adelm
Re Document Nos.: 114, 116, 119, 128 MEMORANDUM OPINION Granting In Part and Denying In Part Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment; Granting In Part and Denying In Part Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment; Denying Defendant’s Motion to Strike; and Denying Plaintiffs’ Motion In Limine RUDOLPH CONTRERAS,
145 F.Supp.2d 6 (2001) INDIVIDUAL REFERENCE SERVICES GROUP, INC., Plaintiff, v. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, et al., Defendants. Trans Union LLC, Plaintiff, v. Federal Trade Commission, et al., Defendants. Nos. CIV.A. 00-1828 ESH, CIV.A. 00-2087 ESH. United States District Court, District of Columbia. April 30, 2001. *7
Lynn Freeman v. Progressive Direct Insurance Companypublic domain
USCA4 Appeal: 24-1684 Doc: 69 Filed: 08/25/2025 Pg: 1 of 27 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 24-1684 LYNN FREEMAN, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. PROGRESSIVE DIRECT
White v. Green Tree Servicing, LLCpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION RÍbHARD D. BENNETT, District Judge. This action arises out of alleged violations of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (“FCRA”), 15 U.S.C. § 1681 et seq., and other state law claims relating to Plaintiff Marceline White’s (“Plaintiff’ or .‘White”) residential mortgage. Currently pending before this Court are Defendant Green Tree Servicing, LLC’s (“Defendant” or “Green Tree”
Sanford v. Russellpublic domain
DAVID M. LAWSON, United States District Judge The Court issues this corrected opinion and order to correct certain non-substantive errors in the original. *910Defendants Michael Russell and James Tolbert move for a summary judgment of dismissal of all claims brought against them by plaintiff Davontae Sanford. Sanford alleged in
641 F.Supp.2d 1382 (2009) In re PUBLIC RECORDS COLLECTION FAIR CREDIT REPORTING ACT (FCRA) LITIGATION. No. MDL 2071. United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. August 6, 2009. Before ROBERT L. MILLER, JR., Acting Chairman, JOHN G. HEYBURN II, Chairman *, KATHRYN H. VRATIL, DAVID R. HANSEN, W. ROYAL FURGESON, JR. and FRANK C. DAMRELL, JR., Judges of the Panel.
Tallon v. Lloyd & McDanielpublic domain
497 F.Supp.2d 847 (2007) Larry TALLON, Plaintiff v. LLOYD & McDANIEL et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 3:06CV-314-H. United States District Court, W.D. Kentucky, Louisville Division. July 20, 2007. *848 Ellen G. Friedman, Louisville, KY, Stephen R. Felson, Cincinnati, OH, Steven C. Shane, Bellevue, KY, for Plaintiff. <