⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Jacobs Vehicle Sys Inc. v. FCA US LLC”

California Court of Appeal · 2024-02-27 · Published · cited 0×
Filed 2/27/24 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION EIGHT JACOB AYERS, B315884 Los Angeles County Plaintiff and Respondent, Super. Ct. No. BC623368 v. FCA US, LLC, Defendant and Appellant. APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Cou
California Court of Appeal · 2021-03-30 · Published · cited 0×
Filed 3/30/21 CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION* IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FIVE BRANDON CRAYTON, B294528, B296241 Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC654811) v. FCA US LLC, Defendant and Respondent. APPEALS from a judgment and postjudgment order of the Su
California Court of Appeal · 2021-04-22 · Published · cited 0×
Filed 3/30/21; Additional Certification for Partial Pub. 4/22/21 (order attached) CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION* IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FIVE BRANDON CRAYTON, B294528, B296241 Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC654811) v.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018-08-24 · Published · cited 0× · 901 F.3d 1124
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES EX REL. SCOTT No. 17-15111 ROSE; MARY AQUINO; MITCHELL NELSON; LUCY STEARNS, D.C. No. Plaintiffs-Appellees, 4:09-cv-05966- PJH v. STEPHENS INSTITUTE, dba Academy OPINION of Art University,
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018-11-26 · Published · cited 0×
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES EX REL. SCOTT No. 17-15111 ROSE; MARY AQUINO; MITCHELL NELSON; LUCY STEARNS, D.C. No. Plaintiffs-Appellees, 4:09-cv-05966- PJH v. STEPHENS INSTITUTE, dba Academy ORDER AND of Art University,
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2024-08-28 · Published · cited 5× · 115 F.4th 680
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 24a0204p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ DENNIS SPEERLY; JOSEPH SIERCHIO; DARRIN DEGRAND; │ DANIEL
Texas Court of Appeals, 15th District · 2025-02-28 · Published · cited 0×
15-25-00021-CV ACCEPTED 15-25-00021-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 2/28/2025 8:28 PM No. _____________________ CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE ___________________________________________
District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2018-02-20 · Published · cited 8× · 298 F. Supp. 3d 1037
THOMAS L. LUDINGTON, United States District Judge On May 25, 2017, the original Plaintiffs (including the first-named Plaintiff Andrei Fenner) filed a complaint against Defendant General Motors LLC ("GM"), Robert Bosch GmbH, and Robert Bosch LLC ("Bosch" and, collectively, the "Defendants"). ECF No. 1. The suit was assigned to United States District Judge George Caram Steeh. On July 25, 2017, Judge Steeh issued a stipulated proposed
District Court, S.D. Texas · 2010-02-17 · Published · cited 1× · 690 F. Supp. 2d 487
690 F.Supp.2d 487 (2009) J.D. FIELDS & COMPANY, INC., Plaintiff and Counterdefendant, v. UNITED STATES STEEL INTENATIONAL, INC., Defendant and Counterplaintiff. Civil Action No. H-08-3076. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division. October 14, 2009. Order Denying Reconsideration February 17, 2010. *
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2023-11-22 · Published · cited 27× · 86 F.4th 1168
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 23a0255p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ THOMAS BALTRUSAITIS; GUILLERMO ANTUNEZ; PATRICK │ BARTH; RICHARD BROECKE
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2025-04-04 · Published · cited 5× · 133 F.4th 678
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 25a0085p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ THOMAS BALTRUSAITIS; GUILLERMO ANTUNEZ; │ PATRICK BARTH; RICHARD BROECKER; RY
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018-08-24 · Published · cited 37× · 909 F.3d 1012
The opinion filed on August 24, 2018, and published at 901 F.3d 1124, is amended by the opinion filed concurrently with this order, as follows: On slip opinion page 10, begin the first full paragraph with: "As relevant here, the falsity requirement can be satisfied in one of two ways." With this amendment, Judges
District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2014-03-25 · Published · cited 15× · 14 F. Supp. 3d 982; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 56818; 2014 WL 1612165
Order (1) Granting in Part and Denying in Part Relators’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and (2) Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment SUSAN J. DLOTT, Chief Judge. This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ and Relators’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. 249) and Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 256). This False Claims Act lawsuit concer
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018-01-26 · Published · cited 3× · 880 F.3d 571
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued September 22, 2017 Decided January 26, 2018 No. 16-1075 AMEREN SERVICES COMPANY, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, RESPONDENT AMERICAN WIND ENERGY ASSOCIATION, ET AL., INTERVENORS Consolidated with 16-1304, 16-1373
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008-03-25 · Published · cited 124× · 523 F.3d 333; 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 6184; 2008 WL 771710
JERRY E. SMITH, Circuit Judge: Marsha Farmer brought an action on behalf of the United States against the City of Houston, Texas, and the Houston Area Urban League (“HAUL”), alleging violations of the False Claims Act (“FCA”), 31 U.S.C. § 3729(a). Farmer claimed that defendants unlawfully received federal funds from the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”) based on false and fraudulent informatio
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2021-11-19 · Published · cited 217× · 19 F.4th 85
20-2756-cv United States of America ex rel. Hassan Foreman v. AECOM et al. 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 2 FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT 3 August Term, 2020 4 (Argued: May 21, 2021 Decided: November 19, 2021) 5 Docket No. 20-2756-cv 6 7 8 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA EX REL. HASSAN FOREMAN, 9
Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2017-12-18 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE OKLAHOMA FIREFIGHTERS ) PENSION & RETIREMENT SYSTEM, ) KEY WEST MUNICIPAL ) FIREFIGHTERS & POLICE ) OFFICERS’ RETIREMENT TRUST ) FUND, JEFFREY DROWOS, ) FIREMAN’S RETIREMENT SYSTEM ) OF ST. LOUIS, and ESTHER KOGUS, ) Derivatively on Behalf of Nominal ) Defendant, Citigroup, Inc., ) ) Plaintiffs,
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2022-08-17 · Published · cited 0×
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED August 16, 2022 No. 20-30382 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Stephen Douglass, Individually and a
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2022-08-17 · Published · cited 0×
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED August 16, 2022 No. 20-30382 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Stephen Douglass, Individually and a