Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Jackson v. Orozco”
Gallardo v. Orozcopublic domain
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW DAVID COUNTS, United States Magistrate Judge. BEFORE THE COURT is Petitioner Maria Julia Gallardo’s First Amended Verified Petition for Return of Child under the Hague Convention. (Doc. 15). This case was referred to the United States Magistrate Judge for the Midland/Odessa Division on March 21, 2013, by Order of Referral from the United States District Judge pursuan
United States v. Zamudio-Orozcopublic domain
MEMORANDUM ** Miguel Angel Zamudio-Orozco appeals from the district court’s decision that it would not have imposed a materially different sentence following a limited remand under United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073, 1084-85 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. Zamudio-Orozco contends that his sentence is unreasonable
State v. Orozcopublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO Docket No. 47263 STATE OF IDAHO, ) ) Plaintiff-Respondent, ) Boise, November 2020 Term ) v. ) Opinion Filed: March 19, 2021
Jackson v. Eagle KMC LLCpublic domain
OROZCO, Judge: ¶ 1 Plaintiff Stephanie Jackson (Jackson) appeals the superior court's judgment in favor of Defendants Eagle KMC, LLC, Rachael Gabriella Hender, Werner Enterprises, Inc., and Drivers Management, LLC (collectively Eagle). Because the court erred in granting summary judgment, we reverse and remand for further proceedings. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY ¶ 2 The facts in t
Mario Orozco Rangel v. Amy Ledgisterpublic domain
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-23-00319-CV ___________________________ MARIO OROZCO RANGEL, Appellant V. AMY LEDGISTER, Appellee On Appeal from the 442nd District Court Denton County, Texas Trial Court No. 20-5256-442 Before Sudderth, C.J.; Bassel and Womack, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Justice Womack
Orozco v. Statepublic domain
This is an appeal from the denial of a Rule 20 petition, Ala.Temp.R.Crim.P. In that petition, appellant requests that he be granted an out-of-time appeal. The state, in its brief, recognizes the well-established rule set out in Griffin v. Illinois, 351 U.S. 12 (1956), that an indigent defendant has a constitutional right to appeal, to have competent representation on appeal, and to have a free transcript on appeal. The state further r
State v. Orozcopublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO Docket No. 47263 STATE OF IDAHO, ) ) Plaintiff-Respondent, ) Boise, November 2020 Term ) v. ) Opinion Filed: March 19, 2021
United States v. Orozcopublic domain
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER IRVING, District Judge. Numerous discovery motions came on for hearing August 20, 1985 before the Honorable J. Lawrence Irving. Appearances of counsel are listed in the official court minutes. The court ruled orally on the majority of the motions, but took under submission the following: 1) Motion for discovery of progress reports;
Orozco v. Clarkpublic domain
705 F.Supp.2d 1158 (2010) Miguel OROZCO, aka Michael Ochoa, aka Domingo Ramos, Petitioner v. Ken CLARK, Respondent. Case No. CV 07-7746-JHN(RC). United States District Court, C.D. California. April 5, 2010. *1162 Miguel Orozco, Corcoran, CA, pro se. Linnea Daya Piazza, Office of Attorney General of California, San Diego, C
United States v. Orozcopublic domain
630 F.Supp. 1418 (1986) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Jose Omar OROZCO, et al., Defendants. No. 85-0252-JLI-Crim. United States District Court, S.D. California. January 21, 1986. As Corrected March 28, 1986. *1419 *1420 *1421
Castle v. Barrett-Jackson Auction Co., LLCpublic domain
276 P.3d 540 (2012) Marshal CASTLE, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. BARRETT-JACKSON AUCTION COMPANY, LLC, an Arizona limited liability company, Defendant/Appellee. No. 1 CA-CV 10-0851. Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department E. May 10, 2012. *541 Porter Law Firm By Robert S. Porter, Phoenix, Attorneys for Plaintiff/Appellant.
State of Tennessee v. Larry E. Orozcopublic domain
05/24/2018 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE December 12, 2017 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. LARRY E. OROZCO Appeal from the Circuit Court for Rutherford County No. F-72737B Paul G. Summers, Senior Judge ___________________________________
Stephen Orozco v. Statepublic domain
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS § STEPHEN OROZCO, No. 08-07-00070-CR § Appellant, Appeal from the § V.
Stephen Orozco v. Statepublic domain
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS STEPHEN OROZCO, Appellant, V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee. §
Raul Orozco v. the State of Texaspublic domain
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-25-00307-CR ___________________________ RAUL OROZCO, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS On Appeal from the 372nd District Court Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 1842938 Before Kerr, Womack, and Wallach, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Justice Kerr M
United States v. Cornelius Jacksonpublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ Nos. 24-1776 & 24-2260 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CORNELIUS M. JACKSON, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________ Appeals from the United States District Court fo
United States v. Cornelius Jacksonpublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ Nos. 24-1776 & 24-2260 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CORNELIUS M. JACKSON, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________ Appeals from the United States District Court fo
Ruben Orozco v. Statepublic domain
Orozco v. State IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-92-092-CR
United States v. Jacinto Garcia-Orozcopublic domain
TANG, Circuit Judge: Jacinto Garcia-Orozco was convicted of importation of marijuana and possession with intent to distribute marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a) and 952, after Customs agents on December 31, 1991, discovered 120 pounds of marijuana in the vehicle Garcia-Orozco was driving across the Mexican border. Because Garcia-Orozco was prejudiced by the erroneo
United States v. Alfredo Orozco-Santillanpublic domain
CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL, Circuit Judge: Alfredo Orozco-Santillan appeals the district court’s denial of his motion for acquit *1264 tal and his conviction on three counts of threatening a federal law enforcement officer, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 115. We affirm. I