⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Jackson v. Navient”

Jones v. Navientpublic domain
Superior Court of Delaware · 2023-09-25 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE KEITH R. JONES, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No.: N21C-10-020 SPL ) NAVIENT, ) ) Defendant. ) Submitted: September 7, 2023
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020-07-27 · Published · cited 16× · 967 F.3d 273
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT No. 19-2116 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA v. NAVIENT CORP; NAVIENT SOLUTIONS LLC Appellants Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania (D.C. Civil Action No. 3-17-cv-01814) Distri
District Court, D. Nevada · 2016-01-21 · Published · cited 0× · 157 F. Supp. 3d 870; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7188; 2016 WL 259695
ORDER (Mot Compel Arb—Dkt. #7) (Mot Strike Affidavit—(Dkt. #16) PEGGY A. LEEN, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Before the court is Defendant Navient Solutions, Inc.’s (“NSI”) Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Proceedings (Dkt. #7). The court has considered the motion, Plaintiffs’ Opposition (Dkt. #9), Defendant’s Reply (Dkt. #12), Defendant’s Supplemental Affidav
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 2017-03-03 · Published · cited 0× · 564 B.R. 770
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION Erik P. Kimball, Judge, United States Bankruptcy Court This matter came before the Court for hearing on December 14, 2016 upon the Motion to Determine Designation of Claims [ECF No. 54] (the “Motion to Designate Claims”) filed by Defendant Navient Solutions, LLC f/k/a Navient Solutions, Inc. (“NSI”), Defendant Navient Solutions, Ine.’s Motion to Com
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Indiana · 2019-03-21 · Published · cited 1× · 600 B.R. 51
Dischargeability of Students Loans under § 523(a)(8) A discharge under section 727, 1141, 1228(a), 1228(b), or 1328(b) of this title does not discharge an individual debtor from any debt- ... (8) unless excepting such debt from discharge under this paragraph would impose an undue hardship on the debtor and the debtor's dependents, for- *
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2019-03-31 · Published · cited 12× · 600 B.R. 783
Beth E. Hanan, United States Bankruptcy Judge The debtor seeks to have his student loans, consolidated in 2001, discharged because he asserts that continued repayment would constitute an undue hardship. After obtaining a bachelor's and Master's degree, being employed and then self-employed for 19 years, the debtor ended his new job search in early 2016 after six weeks to stay home to care for his ailing parent, and then for his yo
ST v. KTpublic domain
Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2020-09-30 · Published · cited 0×
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX 30-SEP-2020 08:07 AM NO. CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX IN THE INTERME
Montana Supreme Court · 2020-07-14 · Published · cited 1× · 467 P.3d 588; 400 Mont. 424; 2020 MT 181
07/14/2020 DA 19-0510 Case Number: DA 19-0510 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 2020 MT 181 JAMES REAVIS, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. PENNSYLVANIA HIGHER EDUCATION ASSISTANCE AGENCY d/b/a FEDLOAN SERVICING,
Machen v. Millerpublic domain
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2024-04-04 · Published · cited 10× · 2024 Ohio 1270
[Cite as Machen v. Miller, 2024-Ohio-1270.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA S. KAREN MACHEN, : Plaintiff-Appellant/ : Cross-Appellee, Nos. 112453, 112454, and : 112479 v.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2025-09-10 · Published · cited 0×
Appellate Case: 24-4051 Document: 57-1 Date Filed: 09/10/2025 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS September 10, 2025
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2025-09-10 · Published · cited 0×
Appellate Case: 24-4051 Document: 55-1 Date Filed: 09/10/2025 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS September 10, 2025
District Court, District of Columbia · 2024-12-10 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JARRELL DEANDRE CURNE, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 23-3789 (BAH) v. Judge Beryl A. Howell U.S. SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION, et al., Defendants.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2025-07-22 · Published · cited 0×
Appellate Case: 24-4051 Document: 51 Date Filed: 07/22/2025 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS July 22, 2025
District Court, N.D. West Virginia · 2016-06-30 · Published · cited 8× · 193 F. Supp. 3d 641; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 84972; 2016 WL 3645195
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS JOHN PRESTON BAILEY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Pending before this Court is the Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) or in the Alternative, Motion to Stay Pending Supreme Court Review [Doc. 71], filed February 12, 2016, by defendants N.C.W.C., Inc. and Palmer Administrative Services, Inc. In March of 2016, the Motion had been fully briefed and was then
Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the First Circuit · 2022-07-29 · Published · cited 0×
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY APPELLATE PANEL FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT _______________________________ BAP NO. MS 21-021 _______________________________ Bankruptcy Case No. 18-30578-EDK Adversary Proceeding No. 19-03003-EDK _______________________________ TAMARA SARA PARVIZI, Debtor. _
District Court, W.D. New York · 2019-02-11 · Published · cited 1× · 353 F. Supp. 3d 223
ELIZABETH A. WOLFORD, United States District Judge INTRODUCTION Plaintiff William B. Kelsey ("Plaintiff") commenced this action on February 1, 2018, alleging that defendant law firm Forster & Garbus, LLP ("Defendant") sought to collect a debt from Plaintiff in violation of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act,
District Court, S.D. Florida · 2019-04-29 · Published · cited 7× · 376 F. Supp. 3d 1298
Ursula Ungaro THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation, issued by Magistrate Judge John O'Sullivan on March 26, 2019 (D.E. 39). Judge O'Sullivan recommended that the Court deny Defendant Medica Healthcare Plans, Inc.'s Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay the Litigation (D.E. 9). The Parties' objections to the Report were due by April 9, 2019, and neither party has filed objections. See
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019-02-08 · Published · cited 2× · 264 So. 3d 345
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT VERIZON WIRELESS PERSONAL ) COMMUNICATIONS, LP, ) ) Appellant,
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2018-09-18 · Published · cited 9× · 338 F. Supp. 3d 943
William C. Griesbach, Chief Judge Plaintiffs Charles Gable and Precious Castner sued Defendants Universal Acceptance Corporation (WI) (UAC), Minnesota Repossessors, Inc. (RPI), and Chase Towing and Transport, Inc. (Chase), for damages arising out of the defendants' efforts to repossess Gable's car in late 2016 and again in early 2017. Gable and Castner asserted claims for violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act ("FDCPA"
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2020-04-10 · Published · cited 17× · 955 F.3d 908
Case: 18-14490 Date Filed: 04/10/2020 Page: 1 of 31 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 18-14490 ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 1:17-cv-00253-MW-GRJ AMANDA LAWSON-ROSS, TRISTIAN BYRNE,