Cases

MEMORANDUM BLAKE, District Judge. On June 21, 2002, a consolidated and renewed motion for remand filed in the Pinney, Farina, Gilliam, Gimpelson, and Naquin actions in this multidistrict litigation was denied.1 I held that federal question jurisdiction supported removal based on the substantial federal question doctrine. In re Wireless Tel. Radio

Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to the Illinois Official Reports accuracy and integrity of this

337 F.Supp.2d 1079 (2004) Bruce G. HOWELL, on behalf of Himself and a Class a Persons Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, v. MOTOROLA, INC., the Profit Sharing Committee of Motorola, Inc., David Devonshire, Glenn Gienko, Garth L. Milne, Ron Miller, William P. Declerck, Richard Enstrom, Rick Dorazil, Christopher B. Galvin, Robert L. Growney, Ronnie C. Chan, H. Laurance Fuller, Anne P. Jones, Donald R. Jones, Jury C. Lewent, Walter E. Massey, Nicholas N

95 F.Supp.2d 1069 (2000) Suzanne GARNER, Plaintiff, v. MOTOROLA, INC., an Arizona Corporation, Defendant. No. CIVA97174PHXPGR(WGY). United States District Court, D. Arizona. April 27, 2000. *1070 *1071 Kraig J Marton, Marton & Hall PA, Phoenix, AZ, Kimberly Ann Eckert, Law Offices of Kimbe

867 So.2d 723 (2003) MOTOROLA, INC. v. ASSOCIATED INDEMNITY CORPORATION, Continental Casualty Company, National Surety Company, Transportation Insurance Company, and Zurich Insurance Company No. 2002 CA 1351. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit. October 22, 2003. *724 S. Gene Fendler, Harold J. Flanagan, New Orleans, J.W.

SIXTH DIVISION June 30, 1998 </

ORDER GRANTING QUALCOMM’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT JONES, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court on Qualcomm’s motion to amend its complaint in the 97-372 case, the lead action in a group of consolidated cases. I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND On March 5, 1997, Qualcomm filed case number 97-372, seeking, inter alia, a declarat

WESLEY, Circuit Judge: There is little doubt that settlements of disputed claims facilitate the efficient functioning of the judicial system. In Chapter 11 bankruptcies, settlements also help clear a path for the efficient administration of the bankrupt estate, including any eventual plan of reorganization. Before pre-plan settlements can take effect, however, they must be approved by the bankruptcy court pursuant to Bankrup

697 N.E.2d 868 (1998) 297 Ill. App.3d 1099 232 Ill.Dec. 126 FRANK J. SCHIFFNER, on Behalf of Himself and All Other Persons Similarly Situated, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MOTOROLA, INC., Defendant-Appellee. No. 1-97-2456. Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, Sixth Division. June 30, 1998.

515 F.Supp. 793 (1979) MOTOROLA COMMUNICATIONS AND ELECTRONICS, INC., Plaintiff, v. MISSISSIPPI PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION and its Chairman, D. W. Snyder; Norman Johnson and John Dale, Members of said Commission; E. W. Robinson, Executive Secretary of said Commission; and Yazoo Answer-Call, Inc., Defendants. Civ. A. No. J78-0465(N). United States District Court, S. D. Mississippi, Jackson Division.<

488 P.2d 1284 (1971) William B. WOOTEN, d/b/a Wooten Plumbing & Heating Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. MOTOROLA COMMUNICATIONS & ELECTRONICS, INC., Defendant in Error. No. 43237. Supreme Court of Oklahoma. September 21, 1971. *1285 Richard E. Romang, Enid, for plaintiff in error. McKeever, Glasser, McKeever &

RULING ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT HAIGHT, Senior District Judge: I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Roderick Jackson (herein “plaintiff’ or “Jackson”) is a black African-American who brings this civil rights action against his former employer, defendant Post University (“defendant,” “Post,” or “the University”), alleging in his complaint that on March 2, 2007

795 F.Supp.2d 949 (2011) Steven D. JACKSON, Plaintiff, v. SIMON PROPERTY GROUP, INC., Defendant. No. C-10-2521 JCS. United States District Court, N.D. California. June 17, 2011. *950 Barbara F. Green, Eugene T. Franklin, Franklin Employment Law Group, Hayward, CA, Brooke Ashley Brown, Sacramento, CA, for Plaintiff. Brooke

782 F.Supp.2d 692 (2011) Erika Renee RILEY-JACKSON, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CASINO QUEEN, INC., Defendant. Case No. 07-cv-0631-MJR-PMF. United States District Court, S.D. Illinois. March 1, 2011. Laura E. Craft, Mark S. Schuver, David A. Gusewelle, Mathis, Marifian & Richter, Ltd., Michael L. McGlynn, Stephen P. McGlynn, McGlynn & McGlynn, Belleville, IL, for

776 F.Supp.2d 815 (2011) Erika Renee RILEY-JACKSON, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CASINO QUEEN, INC., a corporation, Defendant. Case No. 07-CV-0631-MJR. United States District Court, S.D. Illinois. February 27, 2011. *818 Laura E. Craft, Mark S. Schuver, David A. Gusewelle, Mathis, Marifian & Richter, Ltd., Generally Admitted, Micha

19-0480-bk Jackson v. Roberts UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term, 2019 (Argued: January 23, 2020 Decided: August 19, 2020) Docket No. 19-480 _____________________________________ In re: Curtis James Jackson, III, Debtor. ____

988 F.Supp. 34 (1997) Ana SANCHEZ SEPULVEDA, Plaintiff, v. MOTOROLA ELECTRONICA DE PUERTO RICO, INC. a/k/a Motorola Portatiles, Inc. Defendant. Civil No. 97-1741(JP). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. December 4, 1997. *35 Alberto Acevedo Colón, Santurce, PR, for Plaintiff. Francisco Chévere, McConnell Valdés,

625 F.3d 97 (2010) Francis J. FARINA, individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated v. NOKIA INC.; NEC America; Ericsson Wireless Comm., Inc.; Motorola, Inc.; Sprint PCS, L.P.; Audiovox Communications Corporation; Nextel Communications of the Mid-Atlantic, Inc.; Matsushita Corporation of America, also known as Panasonic Corporation; Philips Electronic North America Corp.; Qualcomm Incorporated also known as Qualcomm, Inc; Samsung Tel

ORDER JAMES C. DEVER III, Chief United ■ States District Judge .■ On February 8, 2016, Dr. James H. Jackson (“Dr. Jackson”) and the James H. Jackson Irrevocable Trust (“the Trust”) (collectively, “plaintiffs”) sued Minnesota Life Insurance Company (“Minnesota Life”), First Insurance Funding Corporation (“First Insurance Funding”), and Bar-rington Bank & Trust Company, N.A. (“Barrington”) (col

Filed: March 28, 2005 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT _______________ No. 03-1433 _______________ (CA-01-1421-CCB; CA-01-1456-CCB; CA-01-3259-CCB; CA-01-3260-CCB; CA-01-3261-CCB; CA-01-3899-CCB) J. DOUGLAS PINNEY, M.D.; PATRICIA S. COLONELL, individually and on behalf of all others