Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Jackson v. McKeown”
McKeown v. Pitcockpublic domain
CARLTON, J., for the Court: ¶ 1. Donald McKeown, individually and as personal representative of the decedent, Janice McKeown, for and on behalf of all wrongful-death beneficiaries and as administrator of Janice’s estate, appeals the judgment of the Union County Circuit Court denying his motion for a new trial. Donald claims that the circuit court erred in excluding the cause of death listed on Janice’s death c
Jackson v. McKeownpublic domain
THIS is a suit in equity to restrain a levy upon land which plaintiff acquired from the government. Judgment being for defendants, plaintiff brings error, and applies for a supersedeas with a request that the cause be disposed of as upon final hearing. On May 5, 1915, plaintiff filed on the land in question as a homestead under the homestead acts of the United States. He received his final certificate on May 18, 1918, and his patent about six months later. On March 29, 1915, which was
McKeown v. Statepublic domain
187 Ga. App. 685 (1988) 371 S.E.2d 243 McKEOWN v. THE STATE. 76745. Court of Appeals of Georgia. Decided June 29, 1988. W. Steven Harrell, for appellant. Ralph T. Bowden, Jr., Solicitor, N. Jackson Cotney, Jr., Ann M. Elmore, Assistant Solicitors, for appellee. DEEN, Presiding Judge. The appellant, Timothy M
United States v. Jacksonpublic domain
MEMORANDUM ** In these consolidated appeals, the United States appeals the district court’s orders denying the Government’s request for criminal forfeiture money judgments against Shannon Parsons, Wayne Lamarr Ganaway, and Sharon Hampton, and reducing the criminal forfeiture money judgment against Brian K. Jackson. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. In light of our holding in
Jackson v. Careypublic domain
WALLACE, Senior Circuit Judge, concurring in part, dissenting in part. I agree that summary judgment was inappropriate on the issue of whether Jackson’s liberty interest was implicated by his confinement in the Security Housing Unit (SHU). However, as to the majority’s holding regarding exhaustion of administrative remedies, I respectfully dissent. I would affirm the distric
Jackson v. Careypublic domain
WALLACE, Senior Circuit Judge, concurring in part, dissenting in part. I agree that summary judgment was inappropriate on the issue of whether Jackson’s liberty interest was implicated by his confinement in the Security Housing Unit (SHU). However, as to the majority’s holding regarding exhaustion of administrative remedies, I respectfully dissent. I would affirm the distric
United States v. Jacksonpublic domain
MEMORANDUM ** Quentin Jackson appeals on two grounds his convictions for multiple counts of armed bank robbery and use of a firearm during crimes of violence. We affirm. Jackson’s first claim is that there is insufficient evidence to show that he was the perpetrator of each of the five robberies. However, Jackson was positively identified by multiple eyewitnesses and was caught on tape
United States v. Jacksonpublic domain
MEMORANDUM ** Quentin Jackson appeals on two grounds his convictions for multiple counts of armed bank robbery and use of a firearm during crimes of violence. We affirm. Jackson’s first claim is that there is insufficient evidence to show that he was the perpetrator of each of the five robberies. However, Jackson was positively identified by multiple eyewitnesses and was caught on tape
McKeown v. Woods Holepublic domain
9 F.Supp.2d 32 (1998) John W. McKEOWN, Plaintiff, v. WOODS HOLE, Martha's Vineyard and Nantucket Steamship Authority, Defendant. No. Civ.A. 96-10989-MLW. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. June 3, 1998. *33 *34 *35 David F. Anderson, Latti Asso
United States v. Baxter Franklin Jacksonpublic domain
*1176 PER CURIAM. ' Baxter Franklin Jackson appeals from the imposition of consecutive custodial sentences following revocation of three concurrent terms of supervised release. The district court had jurisdiction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3231; this court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We
364 F.3d 1002 Frederick L. JACKSON, Petitioner-Appellant,v.George J. GIURBINO,* Warden; California State Attorney General, Respondents-Appellees. No. 02-57117. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted November 4, 2003. Filed March 26, 2004.
Jackson v. Jonespublic domain
HERSEY, Judge. Billy Ray Jackson, defendant below, appeals from a final judgment claiming as error the failure of the trial court to abate or dismiss the complaint for failure of the appellee to comply with the Fictitious Name Statute. The dates and sequence of material events in the trial court relevant to our determination of this issue are as follows: April 21, 1980: Kenneth Jon
Barbara v. Hudson v. James Craven Yvette Jackson Patricia Serrano Katrina Golder David Dubackpublic domain
*693 McKEOWN, Circuit Judge: The World Trade Organization (“WTO”) is the international organization charged with dealing with the rules of trade between nations. In late November 1999, top trade officials from WTO-member countries met in Seattle. The Seattle gathering gained national attention, not just f
Jackson v. Beckpublic domain
OPINION BY BOWES, J.: ¶ 1 John F. Jackson (“Father”) appeals pro se from the September 9, 2003 order of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County that denied Father’s request to modify the existing custody order which was entered on May 10, 2002, pursuant to agreement of the parties. For the following reasons, we affirm. ¶ 2 Father and Donna M. Beck (“Mother”) married in
Jackson v. River Pines, Inc.public domain
276 S.C. 29 (1981) 274 S.E.2d 912 Robert W. JACKSON and Lillie P. Jackson, Appellants, v. RIVER PINES, INC., and C.P. Fishburne, Jr., Coleman G. Poag, James D. Hix, Joseph L. Caudell, Thomas A McKinney, Charles B. Ridley, Sr., T. Hugh Simrill, Jr., and Charles B. Ridley, Jr., as Shareholders in River Pines, Inc.; and C.P. Fishburne Jr., Coleman G. Poag, James D. Hix, Joseph L. Caudell and Thomas A. McKinney as Liquidating
Jackson v. Statepublic domain
712 N.E.2d 986 (1999) James JACKSON, Appellant (Defendant Below), v. STATE of Indiana, Appellee (Plaintiff Below). No. 49S00-9705-CR-348. Supreme Court of Indiana. July 14, 1999. Kurt A. Young, Nashville, Indiana, Attorney for Appellant. *987 Jeffrey A. Modisett, Attorney General of Indiana, Randi F. Elfenbaum, Deputy Atto
United States Environmental Protection Agency Ex Rel. McKeown v. Port Authority of New York & New Jerseypublic domain
162 F.Supp.2d 173 (2001) UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, ex rel., Kevin MCKEOWN and No More Tolls, Plaintiffs, v. THE PORT AUTHORITY OF NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY, Robert Boyle, Executive Director; the New York State Thruway Authority, John R. Platt, Executive Director; the Metropolitan Transportation Authority, E. Virgil Conway, Chairman; the New Jersey Turnpike Authority, James Weinstein, Commissioner; Frank X. McDermott, Chairman;
Hoffman v. Jackson'S Minit Markets, Inc.public domain
DEKLE, Justice. A classic conflict for jurisdiction is presented in the proceeding in certiorari. The briefs on jurisdiction are also classic in being set forth on exactly two pages each! Interestingly enough, the conflict is contained in the same bound volume of Southern Reporter. On June 6, 1973, the Fourth District in Clement v. Aztec Sales, Inc., Fla.App., 283 So.2d 68, held that an order granting a new trial was subject t
McKeown v. Carrollpublic domain
The opinion of the court was delivered by Marshall, J.: The plaintiff seeks to compel the specific performance of a contract by which Cornelius Kelly, as alleged by the plaintiff, agreed that if she would live with Cornelius Kelly and Jane Kelly, his wife, as their daughter, all the property owned by Cornelius Kelly should be the plaintiff’s, and that she would be the only heir of Cornelius Kelly, and would
State v. Jacksonpublic domain
918 P.2d 945 (1996) 82 Wash.App. 594 The STATE of Washington, Respondent, v. James Levene JACKSON, Jr., Appellant. The STATE of Washington, Respondent, v. Helen Virginia JACKSON, Appellant. Nos. 18107-0-II, 18108-8-II. Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2. July 12, 1996. *947 Jill Marie J