Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Jackson v. County of Onondaga”
Jackson v. Onondaga Countypublic domain
(2008) Constantine L. JACKSON, Plaintiff, v. ONONDAGA COUNTY; Anthony Callisto, Jr., Chief Custody Deputy, Onondaga County Jail; and Cheryl Spina, Deputy, Onondaga County Jail, Defendants. No. 05-CV-1393. United States District Court, N.D. New York. March 20, 2008. DECISION and ORDER THOMAS J. McAVOY, Senior District Judge. This matter
Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Same memorandum as in Gill, Korff & Assoc, v County of Onondaga (152 AD2d 912). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Tenney, J. — dismiss complaint.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Doerr, Boomer, Balio and Davis, JJ.
Matter of Transform Saleco, LLC v Onondaga County Indus. Dev. Agency (2024 NY Slip Op 05674) Matter of Transform Saleco, LLC v Onondaga County Indus. Dev. Agency 2024 NY Slip Op 05674 Decided on November 15, 2024 Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Matter of 3649 Erie, LLC v Onondaga County Indus. Dev. Agency (2024 NY Slip Op 05673) Matter of 3649 Erie, LLC v Onondaga County Indus. Dev. Agency 2024 NY Slip Op 05673 Decided on November 15, 2024 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Pub
MATTER OF JACKSON v. Walshpublic domain
17 N.Y.3d 774 (2011) 952 N.E.2d 1070 929 N.Y.S.2d 76 2011 NY Slip Op 76225 In the Matter of TOMMY R. JACKSON, Appellant, v. WILLIAM WALSH, Onondaga County Court Judge, et al., Respondents. Motion No: 2011-461 Court of Appeals of New York. Submitted May 2, 2011. Decided June 23, 2011.
Gill, Korff & Associate v. County of Onondagapublic domain
*511OPINION OF THE COURT John R. Tenney, J. These actions, treated together for the purpose of these motions, arise out of the abandoned Onondaga County Resource Recovery Project. Plaintiffs are attorneys and professional engineers apparently engaged to provide services during the study and planning stages of the proposal. The defendants are the county,
Molly, Inc. v. County of Onondagapublic domain
Original proceeding pursuant to EDPL 207, commenced in this Court on July 7, 2003, to challenge the resolution of respondent to acquire certain real property. It is hereby ordered that the determination be and the same hereby is unanimously confirmed without costs and the petition is dismissed. Memorandum: Petitioners commenced this original proceeding pursuant to EDPL 207 to challenge the resolution of respondent
NEWMAN, Circuit Judge. This appeal concerns a district court’s authority to act in a case that was initially removed from a state court, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1452, because it was related to a bankruptcy case, and then remanded back to the state court because the district court determined that mandatory abstention applies. The specific issue is whether, after such a remand, th
Jackson v. Mulroypublic domain
SUMMARY ORDER UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the judgment of the district court be, and it hereby is, AFFIRMED. Plaintiff Tommy R. Jackson brought this action under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985 and 1986 alleging false arrest and malicious prosecution in connection with his arrest in 1995. Jackson’s complaint alleged that defendant Michael Kwiek, a detective with the Syracuse Poli
*28OPINION OF THE COURT Burns, J. In. 1991 an order of support was entered requiring respondent Timothy S. to pay child support for his three children. In 1993 he was incarcerated and was not released until the year 2000. During that period of incarceration, arrears accrued on the 1991 order of support. Upon his release, Timothy S. petitioned Family Court
People v. Jacksonpublic domain
People v Jackson (2024 NY Slip Op 01395) People v Jackson 2024 NY Slip Op 01395 Decided on March 15, 2024 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
People v. Jacksonpublic domain
People v Jackson (2022 NY Slip Op 04257) People v Jackson 2022 NY Slip Op 04257 Decided on July 1, 2022 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
Memorandum: Supreme Court properly dismissed the petition seeking to compel respondent, Onondaga County Resource Recovery Agency (OCRRA), to prepare a supplemental environmental impact statement (SEIS). OCRRA is the “lead agency” for the purposes of the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) in the development of a County landfill site (see, 6 NYCRR 617.6 [b]). In determining the sufficiency of a SEQRA review, the court’s role is limited to whether
People v. Jacksonpublic domain
People v Jackson (2019 NY Slip Op 09206) People v Jackson 2019 NY Slip Op 09206 Decided on December 20, 2019 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary L
People v. Jacksonpublic domain
People v Jackson (2019 NY Slip Op 05860) People v Jackson 2019 NY Slip Op 05860 Decided on July 31, 2019 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law §
People v. Jacksonpublic domain
People v Jackson (2018 NY Slip Op 04204) People v Jackson 2018 NY Slip Op 04204 Decided on June 8, 2018 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law §
Rodal v. Anesthesia Group of Onondaga, P.C.public domain
250 F.Supp.2d 78 (2003) Stewart J. RODAL, Plaintiff, v. ANESTHESIA GROUP OF ONONDAGA, P.C, Defendant, No. 00-CV-1386. United States District Court, N.D. New York. March 18, 2003. Stewart L. Weisman, Esq., Manlius, NY, for Plaintiff. Thomas C. Kingsley, Esq., Syracuse, NY, for Plaintiff. Scolaro, Shuman, Cohen, Lawler & Burstein, P.C. (Shari R. Cohe
People v. Jacksonpublic domain
Appeal from a judgment of the Onondaga County Court (Anthony F. Aloi, J.), rendered May 15, 2014. The judgment convicted defendant, upon a jury verdict, of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, assault in the second degree and criminal contempt in the second degree. It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convictin
People v. Jacksonpublic domain
—Appeal from a judgment of the Onondaga County Court (Anthony F. Aloi, J.), rendered January 6, 2014. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of robbery in the second degree (four counts). It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon a plea of guilty of four counts of robbery in the second degree (Penal Law
People v. Jacksonpublic domain
Appeal from a judgment of the Onondaga County Court (Anthony F. Aloi, J.), rendered May 15, 2014. The judgment convicted defendant, upon a jury verdict, of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, assault in the second degree and criminal contempt in the second degree. It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convictin