Cases

Appellate Case: 22-8024 Document: 010110963862 Date Filed: 12/06/2023 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS December 6, 2023

53 P.3d 1088 (2002) 2002 WY 135 BP AMERICA PRODUCTION COMPANY, a foreign corporation; and Marathon Oil Company, a foreign corporation, Appellants (Defendants), v. Larry MADSEN as Special Trustee of the H.M. Klaenhammer Revocable Trust Dated May 9, 1996, Successor to H.M. Klaenhammer; and Robert W. Scott, Individually and as Managing Member of R.W. Scott Investments, LLC, Suing on Behalf of Themselves and All Other Similarl

EDITH BROWN CLEMENT, Circuit Judge, dissenting from Denial of Rehearing En Banc, joined by JOLLY and JONES, Circuit Judges:1 This court’s denial of the petition for rehearing the Business Economic Loss panel decision en banc misses the last opportunity for this court to clarify its prior Deepwater Horizon decisions and to enforce a proper application of standing and causatio

LESLIE H. SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judge: This appeal concerns issues arising under a Settlement Agreement approved by the district court in December 2012. Relevant to us today is that the settlement provided a mechanism for presenting and processing claims for business losses caused by the April 2010 Deepwater Horizon disaster in the Gulf of Mexico. The district court made two rulings as directed by our October 2013 remand

613 F.3d 1029 (2010) BP AMERICA, INC.; BP Corporation North America, Inc.; BP Products North America, Inc.; and BP America Production Company, Petitioners, v. State of OKLAHOMA, ex rel., W.A. Drew EDMONDSON, Attorney General of Oklahoma, Respondent. No. 09-705. United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. July 29, 2010. *1030 D

*215Opinion by JUDGE FOX T1 Plaintiffs, David Patterson, Phillip McCoy, William Schaefer, and approximately 4000 royalty owners (collectively Royalty Owners), brought a class action against BP America Production Company, formerly Amoco: Production Company, (collectively BP), alleging the underpayment of royalties on the sale of natural gas. Following a j

263 P.3d 103 (2011) BP AMERICA PRODUCTION COMPANY, f/k/a Amoco Production Company, Petitioner v. David PATTERSON, Philip McCoy, William Schaefer, and Beverly Schaefer, Respondents. No. 10SC214. Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc. October 31, 2011. *105 Wheeler Trigg O'Donnell LLP, Scott S. Barker, Denver, Colorado, Holland &

240 P.3d 456 (2010) David PATTERSON, Philip McCoy, William Schaefer, and Beverly Schaefer, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. BP AMERICA PRODUCTION COMPANY, f/k/a Amoco Production Company, Defendant-Appellant. No. 09CA1943. Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. A. February 18, 2010. *459 Law Offices of George A. Barton, P.C., George A. Barton, K

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-24-00352-CV Border to Border Exploration, LLC and BBX Operating, LLC, Appellants v. BP America Production Company, Appellee FROM THE 250TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. D-1-GN-18-007367, THE HONORABLE AMY CLARK MEACHUM, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPINION

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER LEE H. ROSENTHAL, District Judge. I. Background This case arises out of the explosion of the DEEPWATER HORIZON in the Gulf of Mexico on April 20, 2010. Stephen Curtis, an assistant driller, died in the explosion. Wyman Wheeler, a toolpusher, suffered severe injuries. Curtis’s estate and family — referred to in this opinion as “Curtis” — and Wheeler sued under the J

Reversed and Remanded, and Majority and Concurring and Dissenting Opinions filed June 30, 2015. In the Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-13-00352-CV BP OIL PIPELINE COMPANY, Appellant V. PLAINS PIPELINE, L.P., Appellee On Appeal from the 80th District Court Harris C

610 F.Supp.2d 655 (2009) UNITED STATES of America v. BP PRODUCTS NORTH AMERICA INC. Criminal No. H-07-434. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division. March 12, 2009. *659 Abe Martinez, Stephen Mark McIntyre, Financial Litigation, Office of US Attorney, US Marshal-H, US Pretrial SVCS-H, US Probation-H, Houston, TX

Affirmed by published opinion. Judge LUTTIG wrote the opinion, in which Chief Judge WILKINSON joined. Judge WILKINS wrote an opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part. OPINION LUTTIG, Circuit Judge: In this diversity action, appellant First Virginia Banks, Inc., (“FVBI”) appeals from the district court’s grant of summary judgment to appellee BP America, Inc. (“BP”) on the groun

Opinion issued November 5, 2009 In The Court of Appeals

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CITY OF OAKLAND, a Municipal No. 18-16663 Corporation, and The People of the State of California, acting by D.C. Nos. and through the Oakland City 3:17-cv-06011-WHA Attorney; CITY AND COUNTY OF 3:17-cv-06012-WHA SAN FRANCISCO, a Municipal Corporation, and The People of the State of California, acting by ORDER AND and through the San Francisco AMENDED C

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CITY OF OAKLAND, a Municipal No. 18-16663 Corporation, and The People of the State of California, acting by D.C. Nos. and through the Oakland City 3:17-cv-06011-WHA Attorney; CITY AND COUNTY OF 3:17-cv-06012-WHA SAN FRANCISCO, a Municipal Corporation, and The People of the State of California, acting by OPINION and through the San Francisco City Attorney Denni

#28933-a-SRJ 2020 S.D. 47 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA **** THE STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA, THE SOUTH DAKOTA PETROLEUM RELEASE COMPENSATION FUND, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. BP plc, BP AMERICA, INC., BP PRODUCTS NORTH AMERICA, INC., BP WEST COAST PRODUCTS, LLC and its predecessor companies and subsidiaries,

973 F.2d 1468 1993 A.M.C. 9, 61 USLW 2154, 22Envtl. L. Rep. 21,500 Donald SLAVEN; Salvatore Russo; Carl Gassaway; YerikoNitta, d/b/a The Seacliff Motel; Salvatore Manzella;Steven Panto and Donna Panto; Heinz Pet Products Company, aDivision of Star-Kist Foods, Inc., a California Corporation,Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.BP AMERICA, INC.; BP Oil Shipping Co., U.S.A.; BP OilSupply Company;

Hon. M. James Lorenz, United States District Judge Pending before the Court in this putative class action alleging violation of antitrust laws is Defendants' motion to dismiss the first amended complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Plaintiff filed an opposition and Defendants replied. The Court decides the matter on the papers submitted and without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1.d.1. For the

826 F.Supp. 178 (1993) Robert Q. ALIFF, et al. v. BP AMERICA, INC., et al. Civ. A. No. 3:92-0387. United States District Court, S.D. West Virginia, Huntington Division. July 2, 1993. *179 *180 H. Truman Chafin, Gretchen Lewis Chafin, Williamson, WV, for plaintiffs Robert Q. Aliff, Michael R. B