Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Jackson v. Ace American Insurance Co”
Ace American Insurance v. Huntsman Corp.public domain
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION LEE H. ROSENTHAL, District Judge. The plaintiffs in this case are reinsurance companies (the “Reinsurers”)1 seeking to compel arbitration of certain disputes relating to, or to obtain a declaratory judgment establishing, the rights and liabilities arising from reinsurance certificates. The defendants are Huntsman Corporation (“Huntsman”), the insured, an
186 S.W.3d 682 (2006) WYNDHAM INTERNATIONAL, INC., Appellant v. ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE CO., Caliber One Indemnity Co., Essex Insurance Co., Global Excess Partners LLC, Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London, Marsh USA, Inc., Royal Surplus Lines Insurance Co., Westchester Fire Insurance Co., Westchester Surplus Lines Insurance Co., United States Fire Insurance Co., and Zurich American Insurance Co., Appellees. No. 05-04-01443
Hallmark Cnty. Mut. Ins. Co. v. ACE Am. Ins. Co.public domain
ALIA MOSES, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE On March 31, 2016, Plaintiff Hallmark County Mutual Insurance Company ("Hallmark") filed a complaint for declaratory judgment under 28 U.S.C. § 2201 against Defendant Ace American Insurance Company ("Ace"), asking the Court to determine whether Ace must defend certain defen
Voorhees v. Ace American Insurance Co.public domain
DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO STAY AND COMPEL ARBITRATION (DKT. NO. 5) HON. PAMELA PEPPER, United States District Judge The plaintiffs, owners of the yacht M/Y Broadwater, filed a complaint in Milwaukee County Circuit Court alleging breach .of contract and related causes of. -action regarding their coverage under a recreational marine insurance policy issued by the defendant. Dkt. No.;
Beazley Insurance Co. v. ACE American Insurance Co.public domain
OPINION AND ORDER JED S. RAKOFF, United States District Judge. This dispute between three insurers of NASDAQ arises from a class action suit (the “Facebook Class Action”) that retail investors in Facebook brought against NASDAQ in the aftermath of Facebook’s troubled initial public offering on the NASDAQ stock exchange. While plaintiff Beazley Insurance Company, Inc. (“Beaz-ley”) agreed to contribute its
722 F.Supp.2d 948 (2010) AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC., AIG Casualty Company f/k/a, Birmingham Fire Insurance Company of Pennsylvania, AIU Insurance Company, American Home Assurance Company, American International Pacific Insurance Company f/k/a American Fidelity Company, American International South Insurance Company f/k/a American Global Insurance Company, American International Specialty Lines Insurance Company f/k/a Alaska Insurance Company, Com
NOTICE: This opinion is subject to motions for reargument under V.R.A.P. 40 as well as formal revision before publication in the Vermont Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions by email at: JUD.Reporter@vermont.gov or by mail at: Vermont Supreme Court, 109 State Street, Montpelier, Vermont 05609-0801, of any errors in order that corrections may be made before this opinion goes to press. 2022 VT 45
Miller v. Controls & Ace American Insurance Co.public domain
FAIR, J., for the Court: ¶ 1. Jo Ann Miller suffered from intense hip and back pain after working on an assembly line at Johnson Controls. She was ultimately diagnosed with spondy-losis, which required multiple surgeries over the course of several years. ¶2. Miller’s attending physicians concluded that her work at Johnson Controls had aggravated or accelerated the worsening of her back condit
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2020-WC-00417-COA CARLOS JORGE HIMELIZ APPELLANT v. HOG SLAT, INC. AND ACE AMERICAN APPELLEES INSURANCE COMPANY DATE OF JUDGMENT: 03/30/2020 TRIBUNAL FROM WHICH MISSISSIPPI WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALED: COMMISSION
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2018-WC-01490-COA TREMAYNE BURTON APPELLANT v. NISSAN NORTH AMERICA AND ACE APPELLEES AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY DATE OF JUDGMENT: 10/16/2018 TRIBUNAL FROM WHICH MISSISSIPPI WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALED: COMMISSION ATTORNE
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT ROCKLAND FUNDING L.L.C., d/b/a WESTBROOK PARTNERS, Appellant, v. ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee. No. 4D2022-2690 [March 26, 2025] Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach Cou
Affirmed by published opinion. Judge THACKER wrote the opinion, in which Judge SHEDD and Senior Judge HAMILTON joined. THACKER, Circuit Judge: Perini/Tompkins Joint Venture (“PTJV” or “Appellant”) appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of ACE American Insurance Co. (“ACE” or “Appellee”). PTJV filed suit, claiming coverage under p
CARL E. STEWART, Chief Judge: Freeport Welding & Fabricating, Inc. (“Freeport”) and Brand Energy Solutions, L.L.C. (“Brand Energy”) were named defendants in a personal injury suit in Texas state court. ACE American Insurance Company (“ACE”) insures Brand Energy. Freeport sought defense and indemnity from ACE in the state court proceedings as an additional insured under Brand
Ace American Insurance Company v. Erasmo Marezpublic domain
Reversed and Rendered and Memorandum Opinion filed April 12, 2007 Reversed and Rendered and Memorandum Opinion filed April 12, 2007. In The Fourteenth
Escobedo v. Ace Gatheringpublic domain
Case: 23-20494 Document: 81-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/30/2024 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ___________ FILED September 30, 2024 No. 23-20494
Origis USA v. Great American Insurancepublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ORIGIS USA LLC and GUY § VANDERHAEGEN, § No. 461, 2024 § Plaintiffs Below, § Court Below–Superior Court Appellants, § of the State of Delaware § v. § C.A. No. N23C-07-102 § GREAT AMERICAN INSURANCE § COMPANY, AXIS INSURANCE
Valley Forge Ins. Co. v. ACE Am. Ins. Co.public domain
Valley Forge Ins. Co. v ACE Am. Ins. Co. (2018 NY Slip Op 02665) Valley Forge Ins. Co. v ACE Am. Ins. Co. 2018 NY Slip Op 02665 Decided on April 18, 2018 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State
May 20, 2005 Ms. Alicia G. Curran Burt Barr & Associates, L.L.P. P.O. Box 223667 Dallas, TX 75222-3667 Mr. Ethan L. Shaw Moore Landrey L.L.P. 390 Park Street, Suite 500 Beaumont, TX 77701 Mr. Keith T. Gilbert Gilbert & Maxwell P.O. Box 1984 Houston, TX 77251 Mr. Anthony Icenogle DeLeon Boggins & Icenogle, P.C. 221 West 6th Street, Suite 1050 Austin, TX 78701 Mr. Gerald L. Shiely Thornton Summers Biechlin Dunham & Brown 10100 Reunion Place, Suite 200 San Antonio, TX 78216 Mr. James Sowder
517 F.Supp.2d 391 (2007) ACE PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY et al., Plaintiffs, v. FEDERAL CROP INSURANCE CORPORATION, a corporation within the United States Department of Agriculture, Defendant. Civil Action No. 06-1430 (RMU). United States District Court, District of Columbia. September 28, 2007. *392
Kimberly Taylor v. Hino Motors Manufacturing U.S.A., Inc.; And Sompo American Insurance Co.public domain
Cite as 2025 Ark. App. 405 ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION IV No. CV-24-738 KIMBERLY TAYLOR Opinion Delivered September 3, 2025 APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE ARKANSAS WORKERS’ COMPENSATION V.