⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Jack D Daniels and Michelle R Daniels”

District Court, District of Columbia · 2014-02-11 · Published · cited 29× · 15 F. Supp. 3d 62; 93 Fed. R. Serv. 921; 87 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1279; 2014 WL 535213; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16926
MEMORANDUM OPINION BERYL A. HOWELL, United States District Judge The plaintiff in this tort action, LaShan Daniels, alleges that the defendants, the District of Columbia and several named police officers (collectively, “the defendants”), falsely arrested her and caused other damages, including violating her constitutional rights, during an i
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017-03-01 · Published · cited 9× · 850 F.3d 354; 2017 WL 780862; 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 3681
BEAM, Circuit Judge. Charlotte Kokocinski brought a shareholder derivative action on behalf of Med-tronic, Inc., against current and former directors and officers of Medtronic, and against Medtronic as a nominal defendant. The district court 1 dismissed the action on the basis of a report by a special litigation committee
In Re Justicepublic domain
United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · 2009-10-13 · Published · cited 2× · 418 B.R. 342; 2009 Bankr. LEXIS 3249; 2009 WL 3327204
418 B.R. 342 (2009) In re Jack Daniel JUSTICE, and Michelle Andrea Justice, Debtors. No. 07-40195-13-drd. United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri. October 13, 2009. *343 David R. Barlow, Barlow & Niffen, North Kansas City, MO, for Debtors. ORDER GRANTING TRUSTEE'S MOTION TO AMEND CHAPTER 13 PLAN A
Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2021-12-28 · Published · cited 0×
SYLLABUS This syllabus is not part of the Court’s opinion. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Court. In the interest of brevity, portions of an opinion may not have been summarized. State v. Michelle Lodzinski (A-50-19) (083398) Argued October 27, 2020 -- Decided May 26, 2021 Re-Argued on Reconsideration October 25, 2021 -- Decided Decembe
Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2021-12-28 · Published · cited 0×
SYLLABUS This syllabus is not part of the Court’s opinion. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Court. In the interest of brevity, portions of an opinion may not have been summarized. State v. Michelle Lodzinski (A-50-19) (083398) Argued October 27, 2020 -- Decided May 26, 2021 PER CURIAM JUSTICE PATTERSON filed a concurrence, joined by JU
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025-05-14 · Published · cited 0× · 136 F.4th 1181
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CHRISTOPHER GARNIER; Nos. 21-55118 KIMBERLY GARNIER, 21-55157 Plaintiffs-Appellees / D.C. No. Cross-Appellants, 3:17-cv-02215- BEN-JLB v. MICHELLE O'CONNOR- OPINION RATCLIFF; T.J. ZANE, Defendants-Appellants /
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2021-11-23 · Published · cited 2× · 263 A.3d 1079; 2021 ME 60
MAINE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT Reporter of Decisions Decision: 2021 ME 60 Docket: Yor-21-166 Submitted On Briefs: October 20, 2021 Decided: November 23, 2021 Panel: STANFILL, C.J., and MEAD, GORMAN, JABAR, HUMPHREY, HORTON, and CONNORS, JJ. MICHELLE L. SEYMOUR v. JOSHUA J. SEYMOUR CONNORS, J. [¶1] Joshua J. Seymour
Montana Supreme Court · 2008-08-05 · Published · cited 1× · 2008 MT 271; 190 P.3d 1052; 345 Mont. 208; 2008 Mont. LEXIS 418
190 P.3d 1052 (2008) 2008 MT 271 345 Mont. 208 David L. CLOUSE, Lynn B. Michel, Jack B. Shamley, Michael H. McFerrin, John A. Lamb, Virgil A. Wolfe, Timothy A. Zarske, Wayde A. Cooperider, Steven J. Adsem, Alan R. Hughes, Kenneth L. Getz, Kelly W. Blixt, Brett L. Friede, Richard D. Broadwater, Dennis E. Nyland, Joani L. Tompkins, Cory W. Olson, Raymond L. Potter, Christopher T. Cornish, David J. Fradette, D
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · 2015-07-08 · Published · cited 0×
DATE 7/8/2015 FILED IN R NOTICE OF APPEALS 1st COURT OF APPEALS ASSIGNMENT OF COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 7/8/2015 11:03:3
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2022-09-16 · Published · cited 0×
OTIS JONES * NO. 2022-CA-0095 VERSUS * COURT OF APPEAL WHIPS ELECTRIC, LLC., * AFRICK CONSTRUCTION, FOURTH CIRCUIT LLC., PARADISE POOLS AND * SPAS, INC., AND TREVOR STATE OF LOUISIANA REICHMAN ******* APPEAL FROM CIVI
District Court, S.D. New York · 2010-09-13 · Published · cited 13× · 740 F. Supp. 2d 494; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 96597; 2010 WL 3783702
740 F.Supp.2d 494 (2010) In re: TERRORIST ATTACKS ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2001. No. 03 MDL 1570 (GBD). United States District Court, S.D. New York. September 13, 2010. *502 Andrew Joseph Maloney, Blanca I. Rodriguez, Brian J. Alexander, David Beekman, David Charles Cook, Francis Gerard Fleming, James P. Kreindler, Justin Timothy Green, Lee S. K
North Carolina Industrial Commission · 2000-11-21 · Published · cited 0×
Upon review of the competent evidence of record, and finding no good grounds to receive further evidence or rehear the parties or their representative, the Full Commission upon reconsideration of the evidence, affirms the Opinion and Award of the Deputy Commissioner, with some modification. The Full Commission finds as facts and concludes as matters of law the following which were entered into by the parties by Pretrial Agreement as: STIP
District Court, S.D. New York · 2010-06-17 · Published · cited 32× · 718 F. Supp. 2d 456; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 69371; 2010 WL 2484411
718 F.Supp.2d 456 (2010) In re TERRORIST ATTACKS ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2001. No. 03 MDL 1570(GBD). United States District Court, S.D. New York. June 17, 2010. *461 Andrew Joseph Maloney, Blanca I. Rodriguez, Brian J. Alexander, David Beekman, David Charles Cook, Francis Gerard Fleming, James P. Kreindler, Justin Timothy Green,
District Court, N.D. California · 2016-05-16 · Published · cited 0× · 186 F. Supp. 3d 1014; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 64320; 2016 WL 2851571
ORDER RE: CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY, United States Magistrate Judge This action arises out of the attempted collection of debt incurred by Plaintiff Andrew Lee (“Plaintiff’) as a result of his alleged misuse of his employee discount and for changing the oil on his car while at work at Defendant The Pep Boys Manny Moe & Jack of California (“Pep Boys”). Plaintiff alleges th
Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2021-05-26 · Published · cited 0×
SYLLABUS This syllabus is not part of the Court’s opinion. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Court. In the interest of brevity, portions of an opinion may not have been summarized. State v. Michelle Lodzinski (A-50-19) (083398) Argued October 27, 2020 -- Decided May 26, 2021 PER CURIAM JUSTICE PATTERSON filed a concurrence, joined by JU
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010-03-22 · Published · cited 436× · 598 F.3d 1336; 94 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1161; 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 5966; 2010 WL 1007369
598 F.3d 1336 (2010) ARIAD PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, The Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, and the President and Fellows of Harvard College, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant. No. 2008-1248. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. March 22, 2010. *
District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2011-09-13 · Published · cited 8× · 815 F. Supp. 2d 448; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 113980; 2011 WL 4537726
815 F.Supp.2d 448 (2011) In re PUERTO RICAN CABOTAGE ANTITRUST LITIGATION. MDL No. 3:08-md-1960 (DRD). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. September 13, 2011. *450 H. Laddie Montague, Jr., Ruthanne Gordon, Berger & Montague, PC, Philadelphia, PA, Maria D. Bertolez-Elvira, Nestor Mendez-Gomez, Pietrantoni Mendoz & Alvare
United States Court of Federal Claims · 2019-06-18 · Published · cited 0×
In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 11-577V Filed: May 24, 2019 To be Published ************************* D.G., * * Petitioner, *
North Dakota Supreme Court · 2014-02-21 · Published · cited 4× · 2014 ND 40; 842 N.W.2d 920; 181 Oil & Gas Rep. 59; 2014 WL 686743; 2014 N.D. LEXIS 42
SANDSTROM, Justice. [¶ I] Monica Clark, as the personal representative of the estate of Lester Jas-manka, appeals from a district court order denying her motion to vacate a 1990 default judgment quieting title to certain mineral interests in Jack and Eugene Peterson. We affirm, concluding (1) the 1990 judgment was not void and therefore could not be vacated under N.D.R.Civ.P. 60
North Carolina Industrial Commission · 2001-01-31 · Published · cited 0×
Upon review of the competent evidence of record, and finding no good grounds to receive further evidence or rehear the parties or their representatives, the full Commission upon reconsideration of the evidence, affirms the Opinion and Award of the Deputy Commissioner, with some modification. The full Commission finds as facts and concludes as matters of law the following which were entered into by the parties by Pretrial Agreement as: STI