Cases

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See § 737.307, Fla. Stat. (1997); § 737.303(4)(b), Fla. Stat. (1997); Anderson v. Dimick, 77 So.2d 867 (Fla. 1955); Harris Trust Co. of Florida v. Davis, 668 So.2d 689 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996); Smith v. Bank of Clearwater, 479 So.2d 755 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985); Everdell v. Preston, 717 F.Supp. 1498 (M.D.Fla.1989).

PER CURIAM. Upon motion for clarification, the following opinion is substituted in lieu of the opinion filed August 27, 1974. The Judicial Qualifications Commission has conducted proceedings under Rule 6, Judicial Qualifications Commission Rules, to determine whether Judge Jack A. Falk, a Circuit Judge in the Eleventh Judicial Circuit of Florida, should be involuntarily retired for disability seriously in

DIANE P. WOOD, Circuit Judge. This case began almost three decades ago when inmates at what is now the Pendleton Correctional Facility in Indiana filed a class action against the state claiming that certain conditions at the prison violated their constitutional rights. They obtained some of the relief they sought in an injunction that was affirmed by this court in Fren

PER CURIAM. Petitioners, Liz C. Messianu and Inca Máyta Cremiuex (collectively, “Petitioners”), via Petition for Writ of Prohibition, challenge the trial court’s order denying Petitioners’ motion for disqualification of the trial judge in the probate and trust proceeding of the late Carillo Pesenti Pig-na. We grant the petition because it appears from the face of the trial court’s

PER CURIAM. The Judicial Qualifications Commission has conducted proceedings under Rule 6, Judicial Qualifications Commission Rules, to determine whether Judge Jack A. Falk, a Circuit Judge in the Eleventh Judicial Circuit of Florida, should be involuntarily-retired for disability seriously interfering with the performance of his duties, which was or is likely to become permanent in nature. Fla.Const., art. V, § 12, F.S.A.

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. State of Del. ex rel. Gebelein v. Belin, 456 So.2d 1237, 1241 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984); see also Bartlett v. Dumaine, 128 N.H. 497, 523 A.2d 1, 13 (1986); In Re Flagg’s Estate, 365 Pa. 82, 73 A.2d 411, 414 (1950); Estate of George S. Halas, Jr., 209 Ill.App.3d 333, 154 Ill.Dec. 170, 568 N.E.2d 170, 178 (1991); George G. Bogert, Trusts and Trustees § 343 (2d ed. re

PER CURIAM.' Affirmed. See Soriano v. Manes, 177 So.3d 677 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015); Strulowitz v. Cadle Co., II, Inc., 839 So.2d 876 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003).

PER CURIAM. The petition for writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Parkway Bank v. Fort Myers Armature Works, Inc., 658 So.2d 646, 649 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995) (“[J]ust as an appellant must establish that a nonfinal order falls within one of the authorized categories in Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130 before this court has the power to review the merits of the nonfinal order by appeal, a petitioner must establish

907 So.2d 566 (2005) Carlos HARBIE, Appellant, v. Jack A. FALK, Jr., Administrator Ad Litem of the Estate of Youssef Harbie, Appellee. No. 3D04-3041. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. July 6, 2005. *567 Clarke Silverglate Campbell Williams & Montgomery and Jay A. Gayoso, Miami, for appellant. Dunwody

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Hayes v. Guardianship of Thompson, 952 So.2d 498, 505 (Fla.2006); In re Guardianship of Fuqua, 646 So.2d 795, 796 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994); Sun Bank & Trust Co. v. Jones, 645 So.2d 1008, 1017 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994).

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed August 28, 2024. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D23-0724 Lower Tribunal No. 22-4105 ________________ Cash Wallace Pawley, Sr., Appellant,

BOYD, Justice. Pursuant to a petition for mandamus this Court issued an alternative writ directing respondents, Director Kennedy, and Comptroller Lewis, to pay petitioner retirement benefits under Section 123.17, Florida Statutes, due her as the widow of the late Jack Falk, Circuit Judge, or to show cause why such benefits should not be paid. Respondent Lewis replies that the office of Comptroller will process such retiremen

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING AND/OR CLARIFICATION ROTHENBERG, J. We deny appellee Northern Trust, N.A.’s motion for rehearing, grant Northern Trust’s motion for clarification, withdraw this Court’s previous opinion, dated February 8, 2012, and issue this opinion in its stead. Jean Scott Bellamy (“Mrs. Bellamy”) appeals an order granting a joint petition filed by Margaret Bel

*189 EMAS, J. The proceedings below involve an action seeking to revoke probate of two wills, one executed in 2012 and the other in 2013. In that action, four of the testator’s children challenge the testamentary capacity of their mother, and assert that the wills were the product of undue influence by a

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. § 95.14, Fla.Stat. (1989); § 689.18(4), Fla.Stat. (1991).

389 B.R. 636 (2008) In re GGSI LIQUIDATION, INC., et al., Debtor. Gus A. Paloian, not individually but solely in his capacity as the Chapter 7 Trustee of the above captioned Bankruptcy Estates, Plaintiff, v. Grupo Serla S.A. de C.V. a/k/a Grupo Empresarial Serla, S.A. de C.V.; Editorial Comercial, S.A. de C.V.; Sergio Edwardo Guarneros Trujilo; Bank One individually and as successor-in-interest to First National Bank of Chicago, a national ba

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Garrote v. Ocean Bank, 713 So.2d 1095, 1097 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998)(dragnet clause covers future debts when obligations are of the “same kind and class”); Grant S. Nelson and Dale A. Whitman, Real Estate Finance Law § 12.8, at 227-28 (3d ed.1993).

Prohibition denied without opinion.

PER CURIAM. Prohibition dismissed.

PER CURIAM. Prohibition denied.