Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
8 opinions for “Jabal v. United States”
Jabal v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 6th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
United States v. Gilliampublic domain
JON O. NEWMAN, Circuit Judge: The principal issue on this appeal from a conviction for sex trafficking involving a minor is whether information from a global positioning system (“GPS”) can be obtained and used without a warrant to locate a suspect. This issue arises on an
Saleh v. United Statespublic domain
849 F.Supp. 886 (1994) Ahmed Musaed SALEH, Plaintiff, v. The UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. No. 92 Civ. 3646 (CHT). United States District Court, S.D. New York. April 15, 1994. *887 Tabak & Mellusi, New York City (Jacob Shisha, of counsel), for plaintiff. Frank W. Hunger, Asst. Atty. Gen., Mary Jo White, U.S. Att
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE DEBORAH PETTRY, derivatively on ) behalf of FEDEX CORPORATION, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2019-0795-JRS ) FREDERICK W. SMITH, DAVID J. ) BRONCZEK, ALAN B. GRAF, JR., ) HENRY J. MAIER, DAVID P. STEINER, ) S
Nicolas Webb v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)public domain
MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), FILED this Memorandum Decision shall not be May 24 2016, 9:30 am regarded as precedent or cited before any CLERK court except for the purpose of establishing Indiana Supreme Court Court of Appeals
Mohammed v. Harveypublic domain
456 F.Supp.2d 115 (2006) Maisoon MOHAMMED, et al., Petitioners, v. Francis J. HARVEY, et al., Respondents. Civil Action No. 06-1455(RCL). United States District Court, District of Columbia. October 19, 2006. *116 Susan L. Burke, Burke Pyle LLC, Philadelphia, PA, Aziz Huq, Jonathan L. Hafetz, Brennan Center for Justice, NYU School
McGlothlin v. Murraypublic domain
993 F.Supp. 389 (1997) John McGLOTHLIN, Plaintiff, v. Edward MURRAY, et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A. 93-0981-R. United States District Court, W.D. Virginia, Roanoke Division. February 13, 1997. *390 *391 *392 John Patton McGlothlin, Bland, VA, pro se.
Hpublic domain
MATTER OF H— In VISA PETITION Proceedings A-12378722 Decided by Board May 1, 196'2 Marriage—Valid-where-performed polygamous marriage not recognized for immigration purposes—Effect of subsequent divorce from first spouse. The Dolvramous marriage of honofiriary and petitioner which is valid in Jor- dan where performed cannot be recognized as a valid marriage for immi- gration purposes a