Cases

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JUDICIAL WATCH, INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 21-1194 (CKK) ) U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND ) SECURITY, )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JUDICIAL WATCH, INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 21-2824 (CKK) ) U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND ) SECURITY, )

736 F.Supp.2d 202 (2010) JUDICIAL WATCH, INC., Plaintiff, v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al., Defendants. Civil Case No. 07-506 (RJL). United States District Court, District of Columbia. September 9, 2010. *205 Meredith Leigh Di Liberto, Paul J. Orfanedes, Jason B. Aldrich, Judicial Watch, Inc., Washington, DC, for Pl

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JUDICIAL WATCH, INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Case No. 07-506 (RJL) ) U.S. DEPARTMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JUDICIAL WATCH, INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Case No. 07-506 (RJL) ) U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND ) SECURIT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JUDICIAL WATCH, INC. ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) Civil Case No. 07-506 (RJL) U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ) HOMELAND SECURITY, et ale )

598 F.Supp.2d 93 (2009) JUDICIAL WATCH, INC., Plaintiff, v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, et al., Defendants. Civil Case No. 07-506 (RJL). United States District Court, District of Columbia. February 25, 2009. *94 Meredith Leigh Di Liberto, Paul J. Orfanedes, Jason B. Aldrich, Judicial Watch, Inc., Washington, DC, for Pla

514 F.Supp.2d 7 (2007) JUDICIAL WATCH, INC., Plaintiff, v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, et al., Defendants. Civ. Action No. 07cv506 (RJL). United States District Court, District of Columbia. September 24, 2007. *8 Meredith Leigh Di Liberto, Paul J. Orfanedes, Judicial Watch, Inc., Washington, DC, for Plaintiff. Qu

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JUDICIAL WATCH, INC., Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 24-cv-742 (TSC) U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION On March 14, 2024, Plaintiff Judicial Watch, Inc. brought this action against Defendant U.S. Department of Homela

SRINIVASAN, Circuit Judge, dissenting: The Freedom of Information Act serves the important aim of promoting the timely release of requested government records. Ordinarily, when an agency completes its review of a request and releases responsive records during the pendency of a FOIA action, the case becomes moot. The case is not moot, however, if the agency has a general, ongoing policy or practice of violating FOIA. In that event,

MEMORANDUM OPINION [Dkt. # 11] RICHARD J. LEON, United States District Judge Plaintiff Judicial Watch Inc. filed a two-count FOIA complaint against the United States Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”) on November 10, 2015. See generally Compl. [Dkt. # 1]. Count One is a “traditional” FOIA claim, in whi

MEMORANDUM OPINION GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT BARBARA J. ROTHSTEIN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This matter is before the Court on a motion for summary judgment by Defendant United States Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”) and a cross-motion for summary judgment by Plaintiff Judicial Watch, Inc. (“Judi

MEMORANDUM OPINION COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, District Judge. Judicial Watch, Inc. (“Judicial Watch”) brings this Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”) action against the United States Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”), seeking the disclosure of records relating to recent changes in federal immigration enforcement priorities and their implementation in Ho

MEMORANDUM OPINION GLADYS KESSLER, District Judge. Plaintiff, Judicial Watch, Inc., brings this action against Defendant, the Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”), under the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”), 5 U.S.C. § 552. Plaintiff seeks material related to certain types of suspensions of deportation proceedings. This matter is befor

MEMORANDUM OPINION REGGIE B. WALTON, District Judge. Judicial Watch, Inc. (“Judicial Watch”) brings this action against the United States Department of Homeland Security (the “DHS”) under the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”), 5 U.S.C. § 552 (2006), seeking the disclosure of records relating to a survey of illegal immigrants. Complaint for

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, District Judge. Judicial Watch, Inc. (“Judicial Watch”) brings this Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”) action against the United States Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”), seeking the disclosure of records relating to recent changes in federal immigration enforcement priorities and their implemen

OPINION REINHARDT, Circuit Judge: Edward “Bud” Tuffly, the treasurer of the National Border Patrol Council, the union for Border Patrol agents, seeks to compel, under the Freedom of Information Act, the disclosure of the names of 149 non-citizens who were released from detention pending a final determination whethe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JUDICIAL WATCH, INC., Plaintiff, v. Case No. 23-cv-01485 (CRC) U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION In this Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”) case, Judicial Watch seeks from the United States Department of Justice

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JUDICIAL WATCH, INC., Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 1:19-cv-02743 (CJN) U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION The sole issue in this Freedom of Information Act case is whether the government’s partial redactions of a single documen

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JUDICIAL WATCH, INC., Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 20-1729 (TJK) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Judicial Watch, Inc. sued the Department of State under the Freedom of Information Act to obtain records of requests