Cases

18-1120-cv Tobias Bermudez Chavez, et al. v. Occidental Chemical Corp. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term, 2018 (Argued: March 4, 2019 Decided: August 6, 2021) Docket No. 18-1120-cv TOBIAS BERMUDEZ CHAVEZ, GERARDO ANTONIO FONESCA TORRES, FRANKLIN GUILLEN SALAZAR, GARCIA MONTES JOSE GABINO, MARIANO DE LOS ANGELES PIZARRO, ANTONIO OSORN

21-6043-ag Paucar v. Garland In the United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit ________ AUGUST TERM 2022 ARGUED: JANUARY 20, 2023 DECIDED: JULY 12, 2023 AMENDED: OCTOBER 10, 2023 No. 21-6043-ag JUAN PABLO PAUCAR, Petitioner,

21-6043-ag Paucar v. Garland In the United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit ________ AUGUST TERM 2022 ARGUED: JANUARY 20, 2023 DECIDED: JULY 12, 2023 No. 21-6043-ag JUAN PABLO PAUCAR, Petitioner, v. M

Opinion issued May 23, 2023 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-22-00033-CV ——————————— THE CITY OF LAKE JACKSON AND VELASCO DRAINAGE DISTRICT, Appellants V. RICKY ADAWAY, ROBERT ADEN, THOMAS ALBERS

859 F.2d 1354 57 USLW 2292 COMPANIA MEXICANA DE AVIACION, S.A., a corporation doingbusiness as Mexicana Airlines, Petitioner,v.UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR the CENTRAL DISTRICT OFCALIFORNIA, Respondent,andAdela Espinosa De Penasco, Carlos Penasco Garcia, PatriciaGuadarrama Ortiz, Rodolfo Guadarrama Ortiz, Raul GuadarammaOrtiz, Ana Maria Esperanza Cuellar Marovilla, Federico PerezM

534 F.3d 1320 (2008) Adelina GARCIA; Antonio Garcia; Jeronimo Vargas-Vera; Efrain Aguilar; Paulina Aguilar; Adelaida Aguirre; Jose R. Aguirre; Salvador Almanza; Miguel Amaya; Rogelio Andrade; Jesus Anguiano; Efigenia Arana; Jose R. Arana; Ramon Arana; Alma Armendariz; Jorge L. Banda Valadez; Delfino Barragan; Lucia Barragan; Ramon P. Barragan; Holga Benitez; Baltazar Bonilla; Maria Guadalupe Bonilla; Catalina Bustillos; Bernardo Calderon; Etelvina Calder

246 F.Supp.2d 646 (2003) Julio Jasso ZERMENO, et al., Plaintiff, v. MCDONNELL DOUGLAS CORPORATION, et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A.H-02-2862. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division. February 18, 2003. *648 Peter Michael Kelly, Kelly Jeremiah et al, Houston, TX, for plaintiffs. David J Beck, Beck Redden an

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. ARTURO JUAREZ SUAREZ, Defendant and Appellant. S105876 Napa County Superior Court CR103779 August 13, 2020 Justice Liu authored the opinion of the Court, in which Chief Justice Cantil-Sakauye and

PER CURIAM: * Compañía Mexicana de Aviación (Mexica-na) flight 940 crashed at Michoacan, Mexico, shortly after takeoff from Mexico City on March 31, 1986, killing all aboard. This action is brought on behalf of 69 Mexican decedents who travelled on tickets purchased in Mexico for travel within Mexico. Mexicana moved to dismiss the action for lack of jurisdiction because of

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DANIEL CAMPBELL; et al, * No. 15-56990 Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. v. 2:04-cv-08592- AG-AJW CITY OF LOS ANGELES, Defendant-Appellee. CESAR MATA,

APPOINTMENT OF PRETRIAL JUDGE IN THE FOLLOWING MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION CASE: Pursuant to Administrative Rule 13, the cases listed on Appendix A, attached hereto and incorporated herein for all purposes, and tag-along cases if any, are transferred to Judge Tracy Christopher of the 295th District Court of Harris County. Justice CASTILLO not sitting. APPENDIX A Amended Appendix A, Part I and

PHILLIPS, Circuit Judge. CGG Land (U.S.) Inc.’s employees (Employees) brought this collective action alleging violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). The FLSA generally requires employers to compensate overtime hours at one and one-half times the employee’s “regular rate” of pay. See 29 U.S.C. § 207(a)(1) (2012). Employees claim that CGG violated

ACCEPTED 15-25-00013-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 12:26 PM No. 15-25-00013-CV

ACCEPTED 15-25-00012-cv FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 3:13 PM No. 15-25-00012-CV

Sack, Circuit Judge: This appeal presents two state-law questions that neither this Court nor New York's courts have addressed: (1) whether New York law recognizes "cross-jurisdictional class action tolling," i.e., tolling of a New York statute of limitations by the pendency of a class action in another jurisdiction; and (2) whether a non-merits dismissal of class certification can term

Mb. Justice MacLeary delivered the opinion of the court. This appeal was filed in this court on the 24th of September, 1903, hy Emilio Montilla, seeking to reverse a judgment rendered by the District Court of San Juan, on the 14th day of August, 1903, in a suit which he had instituted to nullify certain documents and decrees of court, in regard to an estate lying in the jurisdiction of Bayamón and called “Santa C

MURPHY, Circuit Judge. Defendants-appellants Tyson Foods, Inc. and Tyson Fresh Meats, Inc. (collectively, “Tyson”) appeal from the district court’s interlocutory order denying their motion for partial summary judgment. We ordered the parties to submit briefs addressing whether this appeal should be dismissed on the ground that the order appealed from was not final. Tyson argues that we have jurisdiction over the appeal under