Cases

ORDER J.P. STADTMUELLER, District Judge. On June 30, 2011, the parties' in this action .filed cross-motions for summary judgment (Docket # 67, # 75). The case arises under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act’s citizen suit provision, 42 U.S.C. § 6972, as well as Wisconsin tort law. Plaintiff Tilot Oil, LLC (“Tilot”) has essentially alleged that defendant BP Products North America, Inc. (“BP”) is li

19-2474-cv Critcher, et al v. L’Oreal USA, Inc. In the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit AUGUST TERM 2019 No. 19-2474-cv MARY TULLIE CRITCHER, TWOANA CLARK-SHEPPARD, VICTORIA MARYNOVSKY, PATRICIA BELBOT, JESSICA PETRIE, LINDA FEIGES, SARAH MCQUEARY, GEORGETTE C. FOURNIER, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF

247 F.Supp.2d 90 (2003) Ilianita SANCHEZ RIVERA, et al., Plaintiffs, v. DOCTORS CENTER HOSPITAL, INC., et al., Defendants. No. CIV. 01-2713(JP). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. February 25, 2003. *93 Rafael E. García Rodón, Esq., San Juan, for Plaintiff. Raphael Peña Ramón, Esq., Enrique Nassar-Risek, Esq., H

HONORABLE PAUL A. CROTTY, United States District Judge: This is a securities case brought by buyers of stock in Stemline Therapeutics, Inc. ("Stemline"), which develops a highly sophisticated and complicated drug for the treatment of an otherwise fatal blood cancer. The buyers contend they were misled by Stemline's claimed ability to remediate certain fatal side effects of its drug. Lead Plaintiffs Adam Ludlow, Dalji

330 F.Supp.2d 865 (2004) HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC. and Honeywell Intellectual Properties, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. ITT INDUSTRIES, INC., ITT Automotive, Inc., TG North America Corporation, TG Fluid Systems USA Corporation, and A. Raymond, Inc., Defendants. No. 02-73948. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. August 5, 2004.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT JOHN R. TUNHEIM, District Judge. Plaintiff Charles Yanez was injured while working as a paint sprayer at DMI Industries, Inc. (“DMI”) in West Fargo, North Dakota. He suffered injuries to his left hand when a whip hose that was part of a paint spray system failed while he was high-pressure spray painting the inside of a wind turbine

OPINION SUE L. ROBINSON, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION This action arises out of the filing of an Abbreviated New Drug Application (“ANDA”)1 by defendant Barr Laboratories, Inc. (“Barr”) on March 26, 2009 for a generic version of Lumigan® (bimatoprost ophthalmic solution), used for the treatment of high eye pressure, also called intraocular pressure (“IOP

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE CITY OF SARASOTA § FIREFIGHTERS’ PENSION FUND, § STEAMFITTERS LOCAL 449 § No. 305, 2023 PENSION FUND, and § STEAMFITTERS LOCAL 449 § RETIREMENT SECURITY FUND, § Court Below: Court of Chancery § of the State of Delaware Plaintiffs Below, Appellants, § §

530 F.Supp.2d 429 (2008) Yaritza TORRES-PEREZ, et al., Plaintiffs v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. No. 06-2273 (JP). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. January 9, 2008. *430 John E. Mudd, Esq., John E. Mudd Law Office, San Juan, PR, for Plaintiffs. Isabel Muñoz-Acosta, Esq., United States Attorney's Offic

RULING ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT THAD J. COLLINS, Chief Judge. These matters came before the Court on the Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff Farmers Cooperative Company, Hinton, Iowa and Defendant Ernst & Young, Inc., in its official capacity as Receiver for Big Sky Farms, Inc., each filed summary judgment motions. The Court held a telephonic hearing. Lance Ehmcke and P

485 F.Supp.2d 14 (2007) Yolanda ISAAC-BURGOS, et al., Plaintiffs v. Dr. Gilberto RODRIGUEZ, et al., Defendants. Civil No. 06-1259 (JP). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. May 2, 2007. *15 Pedro F. Soler-Muñiz, Esq., Centro Internacional de Mercadeo, Guaynabo, PR, Wanda I. Medina-de Soler, Esq., Caparra Heights, San Jua

179 Cal.App.4th 262 (2009) RICHARD MERRILL et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. LESLIE CONTROLS, INC., Defendant and Appellant; ELLIOTT COMPANY, Defendant and Respondent. No. B200006. Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Three. November 17, 2009. CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION[*]

177 Cal.App.4th 1348 (2009) RICHARD MERRILL et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. LESLIE CONTROLS, INC., Defendant and Appellant; ELLIOTT COMPANY, Defendant and Respondent. No. B200006. Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Three. September 25, 2009. CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION[*]

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE TESLA MOTORS, INC. ) CONSOLIDATED STOCKHOLDER LITIGATION ) C.A. No. 12711-VCS MEMORANDUM OPINION Date Submitted: January 18, 2022 Date Decided: April 27, 2022 Jay W. Eisenhofer, Esquire, Christine M. Mackintosh, Esquire, Kelly L. Tucker, Esquire and Vivek Upadhya, Esquire of Grant & Eisenhofer P.A., Wilming

Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge DYK. Opinion concurring-in-part and dissenting-in-part filed by Circuit Judge LINN. DYK, Circuit Judge. Therasense, Inc. (now Abbott Diabetes Care, Inc.) and Abbott Laboratories appeal from a final judgment of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. Following a bench trial, the district court determined that claims 1-4 of U.S.

794 F.Supp. 1370 (1992) AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC., Plaintiff, v. MEDICAL ENGINEERING CORPORATION, Defendant. No. 87-C-1236(JPS). United States District Court, E.D. Wisconsin. June 25, 1992. *1371 *1372 *1373 George Pazuniak, Rudolf E. Hutz, Eric Hutz,

KEVIN GROSS, U.S.B.J. Introduction1 Alan Halperin, in his capacity as Trustee (the "Trustee") of the GFES Liquidation Trust (the "Trust") brought a motion for partial summary judgment (the "Trustee's Motion") against Michel B. Moreno ("Moreno"), MOR MGH Holdings, LLC ("MOR MGH"), Aerodynamic, LLC ("Aerodynamic"), Casafin II, LLC ("Casafin"), Frac Rentals, LLC ("Frac Rent

OPINION AND ORDER WILLIAM M. CONLEY, District Judge. Once the concept of employee stock ownership plans (ESOPs) gained acceptance in the early 1970s, their numbers grew rapidly. See Steven F. Freedman, Effects of ESOP Adoption and Employee Ownership: Thirty years of Research and Experience, 2007 University of Pennsylvania Dynamics Working Papers, # 07-01 (January 10, 2007), posted at http:// repo

J. P. Stadtmueller, U.S. District Judge This is a trademark and copyright infringement case brought by Plaintiffs, collectively referred to as "Harley-Davidson," against Defendants, collectively referred to as "SunFrog." SunFrog runs a website where third parties can upload designs and logos, place them onto clothing, hats, mugs, or other items, and sell them. SunFrog handles printing the goods and shipping them, and it takes the ma

776 F.Supp.2d 469 (2011) AUTOMOTIVE TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL, INC., Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, v. DELPHI CORPORATION, et al., Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. Case No. 08-11048. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. March 9, 2011. *474 Edward W. Goldstein, Goldstein, Faucett and Prebeg, Houston, TX, He