⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. v. NEU”

Indiana Court of Appeals · 2014-01-30 · Published · cited 0× · 24 N.E.3d 548
OPINION NAJAM, Judge. STATEMENT OF THE CASE Joel Stoffel appeals the trial court’s post-judgment order denying his motion to compel payment of an alleged surplus following a mortgage foreclosure and sheriffs sale. Stoffel claims he is entitled to recover the difference between the face amount of the judgment and the amount bid at the sheriffs sale. Stoffel presents three issues for review
Indiana Court of Appeals · 2014-01-30 · Published · cited 1× · 3 N.E.3d 548; 2014 WL 325852; 2014 Ind. App. LEXIS 34
OPINION NAJAM, Judge. STATEMENT OF THE CASE Joel Stoffel appeals the trial court's post-judgment order denying his motion to compel payment of an alleged surplus following a mortgage foreclosure and sheriffs sale. Stoffel claims he is entitled to recover the difference between the face amount of the judgment and the amount bid at the s
Indiana Court of Appeals · 2007-11-21 · Published · cited 3× · 883 N.E.2d 106; 2007 Ind. App. LEXIS 3055; 2007 WL 4991320
883 N.E.2d 106 (2007) JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, as Trustee for Equity One ABS, Inc., Mortgage Pass-Through Certified Series # 2003-1, Appellant-Plaintiff, v. Curtis M. HOWELL and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Successor by Merger with Bank One, Indiana, N.A., f/k/a Bank One, Indiana, N.A., Appellees-Defendants. No. 02A03-0702-CV-74. Court of Appeals of Indiana. November 21, 2007.
Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2019-11-26 · Published · cited 21× · 333 Conn. 769
November 26, 2019 CONNECTICUT LAW JOURNAL Page 41 333 Conn. 769 NOVEMBER, 2019 769 Cenatiempo v. Bank of America, N.A. CARMINE CENATIEMPO ET AL. v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. (SC 20150) Robinson, C. J., and Palmer, McDonald, D’Auria, Mullins, Kahn
District Court, D. New Jersey · 2016-12-21 · Published · cited 0× · 225 F. Supp. 3d 261; 2016 WL 7391034; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 176299
OPINION SIMANDLE, Chief Judge: I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Charlene Martinez brings this putative class action against Defendants TD Bank USA, N.A. (“TD Bank”) and Target Corporation (“Target”), alleging violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”), 47 U.S.C. § 227; the Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“RFDCPA”), Cal. Civ. Code §§ 1788-1788.33; and California
California Court of Appeal · 2014-05-23 · Published · cited 148× · 226 Cal. App. 4th 594; 14 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5744; 172 Cal. Rptr. 3d 218; 2014 WL 2149725; 2014 Cal. App. LEXIS 452
Opinion McConnell, P. J.— INTRODUCTION Marvin B. Graham borrowed money to purchase a house in 2004. Approximately seven years later, he defaulted on his loan and received a notice of sale. Graham filed this action to halt foreclosure proceedings and to cancel the note. He contends “defendants’ Lending Personnel”
Nevada Supreme Court · 2024-06-27 · Published · cited 0× · 140 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 43
140 Nev., Advance Opinion Li 3 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY No. 85073 AMERICAS AS TRUSTEE RALI 2006QA5, Appellant, vs. FILED SFR INVESTMENTS POOL 1, LLC, A
California Court of Appeal · 2014-03-26 · Published · cited 96× · 224 Cal. App. 4th 1462; 169 Cal. Rptr. 3d 619; 2014 WL 1229660; 2014 Cal. App. LEXIS 277
Opinion GROVER, J. Plaintiffs Carlos and Resurreccion Cansino appeal from a judgment of dismissal sustaining defendant’s demurrer to a second amended complaint without leave to amend. Because plaintiffs’ complaint fails for lack of specificity, and because the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying leave to amend the complaint, we will affirm t
Nevada Supreme Court · 2022-09-08 · Published · cited 0× · 2022 NV 56
138 Nev., Advance Opinion IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA EDDY MARTEL, A/K/A MARTEL- No. 82161 RODRIGUEZ; MARY ANNE CAPILLA; JANICE JACKSON-WILLIAMS; AND WHITNEY VAUGHAN, ON BEHALF OF THEMSELVES AND ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, FILE Ap
Nevada Supreme Court · 2022-08-11 · Published · cited 0× · 515 P.3d 318; 2022 NV 56
138 Nev., Advance Opinion 5(0 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA EDDY MARTEL, A/K/A MARTEL- No. 82161 RODRIGUEZ; MARY ANNE CAPILLA; JANICE JACKSON-WILLIAMS; AND WHITNEY VAUGHAN, ON BEHALF OF .•••• THEMSELVES AND ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED,
Nevada Supreme Court · 2022-09-08 · Published · cited 0× · 2022 NV 56
138 Nev., Advance Opinion IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA EDDY MARTEL, A/K/A MARTEL- No. 82161 RODRIGUEZ; MARY ANNE CAPILLA; JANICE JACKSON-WILLIAMS; AND WHITNEY VAUGHAN, ON BEHALF OF THEMSELVES AND ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, FILE Ap
Indiana Court of Appeals · 2019-07-26 · Published · cited 0×
MEMORANDUM DECISION FILED Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), Jul 26 2019, 7:36 am this Memorandum Decision shall not be CLERK regarded as precedent or cited before any Indiana Supreme Court
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017-02-17 · Published · cited 522× · 849 F.3d 400; 96 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1273; 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 2788; 2017 WL 655434
GRUENDER, Circuit Judge. Mark Neubauer and his corporate entity, Marken, Inc., allege that FedEx Corporation; FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.; David Rebholz; Rodger Marticke; and Clifford Johnson (collectively “FedEx”) breached contractual duties, engaged in fraud, and violated North Dakota’s Franchise Investment Law and Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Ac
Indiana Court of Appeals · 2012-05-24 · Published · cited 1× · 967 N.E.2d 1080; 2012 Ind. App. LEXIS 243; 2012 WL 1881058
967 N.E.2d 1080 (2012) FINANCE CENTER FEDERAL CREDIT UNION, Appellant-Defendant, v. Ronnie D. BRAND, Debora J. Brand and GMAC Mortgage, LLC, Appellee-Plaintiff. No. 49A02-1111-MF-1089. Court of Appeals of Indiana. May 24, 2012. *1081 Jeffrey K. Graham, Bingham Farrer & Wilson, P.C., Elwood, IN, Attorney for Appellant.
Thomas v. Thomaspublic domain
Indiana Court of Appeals · 2010-03-16 · Published · cited 5× · 923 N.E.2d 465; 2010 Ind. App. LEXIS 389; 2010 WL 932366
923 N.E.2d 465 (2010) Richard THOMAS, Allita Thomas, and Trustcorp Mortgage Company, Appellants/Defendants, and Fannie Mae and EverBank, Appellants/Third-Party Defendants, v. Benjamin H. THOMAS, Appellee/Plaintiff. No. 45A05-0906-CV-357. Court of Appeals of Indiana. March 16, 2010. *467 John H. Halstead, Querrey & Harlow,
Indiana Supreme Court · 2025-06-03 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE Indiana Supreme Court Supreme Court Case No. 24S-PL-184 EdgeRock Development, LLC, ZPS Westfield, LLC, FILED and First Bank Richmond, Jun 03 2025, 2:16 pm Appellants/Defendants, CLERK
Indiana Court of Appeals · 2012-05-24 · Published · cited 0×
FOR PUBLICATION FILED May 24 2012, 8:34 am CLERK of the supreme court, court of appeals and tax court ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: ATTORNEY
Indiana Court of Appeals · 2010-09-10 · Published · cited 6× · 934 N.E.2d 142; 2010 Ind. App. LEXIS 1685; 2010 WL 3517954
934 N.E.2d 142 (2010) CROWN COIN METER COMPANY, Commercial Coin Laundry Systems, American Coin Laundry, Appellants-Defendants, v. PARK P, LLC, Appellee-Plaintiff. No. 34A02-1002-PL-185. Court of Appeals of Indiana. September 10, 2010. *144 Bruce Brattain, Mario Garcia, Brattain & Minnix, Indianapolis, IN, Attorneys for Appell
California Court of Appeal · 2020-04-02 · Published · cited 0×
Filed 4/2/20 CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION* IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (Placer) ---- ROBERT WEIMER, JR., C080550 Plaintiff and Appellant, (Super. Ct. No. SCV0035286) v. NATIONSTAR MO
District Court, S.D. California · 2018-06-26 · Published · cited 16× · 331 F. Supp. 3d 1018
C. The Common Law Fraud Claim is Dismissed with Prejudice The Pembertons assert a fraud claim against Nationstar based on Nationstar's alleged failure to report deferred interest payments. They allege that "Nationstar knowingly and intentionally misrepresented the correct amount of interest that plaintiffs paid to it in 2013" on their Form 1098, and "intentionally concealed" its wrongful reporting. (FAC ¶ 73.) The basis of