Cases

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Special Appeals of Maryland denied.

HOTTEN, J. Appellant, the Comptroller of Maryland (“the State”), appeals from a judgment entered by the Circuit Court for Montgomery County, granting appellee’s, Kenneth R. Shipe’s, motion to release a tax judgment lien held by the State for unpaid income taxes regarding the 1997 and 1998 tax years. The State noted an appeal and pre

Petition for writ of certiorari dismissed.

GREENE, J. The Act at issue in the present case is Senate Bill 167, Chapter 191 of the 2011 Laws of Maryland (the “Maryland *599Dream Act” or “the Act”). The Act seeks to exempt certain students from paying out-of-state tuition rates at higher education institutions in Maryland. The Act was signed into law on May 10, 2011. Following the enactment, MDPetitions.com (“Ap

PER CURIAM ORDER. The Court having considered and granted the petition for a writ of certiorari in the above-entitled case, it is this 1st day of March 2013, ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals, that the judgment of the Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County be, and the same is hereby, affirmed summarily by a unanimous Court** on the bases of laches and untimeliness,

ADKINS, J., dissenting. I cannot endorse the Majority’s disregard for our plain-meaning rule of statutory construction,1 and its conclusion that the signer and circulator of a referendum petition can be the same individual. When engaging in statutory interpretation, this Court’s “paramount objective [is] to ascertain and give *164

ORDER PER CURIAM ORDER. For reasons to be stated in an opinion later to be filed, it is this 17th day of August, 2012, ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, a majority of the Court concurring, that the judgment of the Circuit *524Court for Anne Arundel County be, and it is hereby, affirmed. Costs to be pa

ORDER PER CURIAM ORDER. For reasons to be stated in an opinion later to be filed, it is this 13th day of June, 2012, ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the judgment of the Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County be, *60and it is hereby, affirmed. Costs to be paid by the Appellants. Mandate to issue forth

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Dennis M. O’Hara appeals- the district court’s orders dismissing his petition for ■writ of mandamus for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

21 F.3d 423NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. James Joseph OWENS, Petitioner Appellant,v.STATE of Maryland, Respondent Appellee. No. 94-6032. United States Court of Ap

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Maryland denied.

454 F.Supp.2d 339 (2006) MARYLAND STATE CONFERENCE OF NAACP BRANCHES, et al. v. MARYLAND STATE POLICE, et al. No. CIV.A. JKB-98-1098. United States District Court, D. Maryland. September 29, 2006. *340 Reginald T. Shuford, Corey Lynn Stoughton, American Civil Liberties Union Foundation, New York, NY, Allison Cohen Stanton, Peter

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Maryland denied.

988 A.2d 545 (2010) 190 Md. App. 275 Larry Livingston JOSEPH v. STATE of Maryland. No. 1477 September Term, 2008. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. February 1, 2010. *547 David P. Kennedy (Elizabeth L. Julian, Acting Public Defender, on the brief), Baltimore, MD, for Appellant. Jessica V. Carter

MEMORANDUM OPINION GEORGE L. RUSSELL, III, District Judge. This employment discrimination action is before the Court on Defendants State of Maryland (“State”), Sergeant Bruce Sutton, Captain Robert MacKenzie, Margaret Chippendale, and William Filbert’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff Laurie Davenport’s Amended Complaint. (ECF No. 37). Also before the Court is Defendant William Blackiston’s Motion t

932 A.2d 1225 (2007) 176 Md. App. 231 Alen J. SALERIAN v. MARYLAND STATE BOARD OF PHYSICIANS. No. 624 September Term 2006. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. September 26, 2007. *1228 Alen J. Salerian, pro se, Washington, DC (Paul T. Stein, Sperling, Bennett, DeJong, Driscoll & Greenfeig, PC, on the

932 A.2d 783 (2007) 176 Md. App. 82 MARYLAND STATE BOARD OF PHYSICIANS v. Harold I. EIST, M.D. No. 329, Sept. Term, 2006. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. September 13, 2007. *786 Thomas W. Keech (J. Joseph Curran, Jr. on the brief), Baltimore, for appellant. Alfred F. Belcuore (on the brief),

930 A.2d 304 (2007) 401 Md. 1 Linda SCHADE, et al. v. MARYLAND STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS, et al. No. 64, September Term, 2004. Court of Appeals of Maryland. August 24, 2007. *305 Ryan P. Phair (Laura A. Thomas, Kathryn R. DeBord and John P. Gonsoulin of Kirkland & Ellis L.L.P. of Washington, D.C.; John

MEMORANDUM OPINION WILLIAM D. QUARLES, JR., District Judge. Joseph Weigel sued the State of Maryland and Armistead Homes Corporation (“Armistead”) for declaratory and injunctive relief. ECF No. 1. On September 12, 2012, Weigel moved for a temporary restraining order (“TRO”) and preliminary injunction. ECF Nos. 2, 3. On October 15, 2012, Weigel and others1 (collectively, the “P

In 2005, Congress passed the Energy Policy Act ("EPACT"), which phased out the RFG oxygenate requirement and established the Renewable Fuel Program in its place. See Energy Policy Act of 2005, Pub. L. No. 109-58, §§ 1501, 1504, 119 Stat. 594 (2005). The new program requires gasoline suppliers to blend their product with renewable fuels, suc