Cases

NUMBERS 13-19-00626-CR COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG JOSE LUIS GARCIA JR., Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee. On appeal from the 398th District Court of Hidalgo

606 F.3d 1317 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Luis PALOMINO GARCIA, a.k.a. Ramon Lopez-Garcia, a.k.a. Jose Luis Palomino Garcia, a.k.a. Luis Garcia Palomino, a.k.a. Jose Luis Palomino, Defendant-Appellant. No. 09-10534. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. May 21, 2010. *1319 George Allen Cout

PER CURIAM: Jose Yeyille, a lawyer proceeding pro se, appeals the district court’s dismissal with prejudice of his third amended complaint, as well as its denial of his motion for relief from that judgment. Yeyille argues on appeal that the district court abused its discretion by dismissing his complaint with prejudice, because his 148-page, 30-count complaint was not a “shotgun pleading.” He also argues that the di

NUMBER 13-10-00047-CR COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG JOSE LUIS CANTU, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee. On appeal from the 92nd District Court of Hida

BACHARACH, Circuit Judge. A group of employees filed class and collective actions against Tyson Foods, Inc., seeking unpaid wages for time spent on pre- and post-shift activities. After the employees obtained a sizeable verdict and fee award, 1 Tyson unsuccessfully moved for judgment as a matter of law. On appeal, Tys

[PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED ________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT MAY 21, 2010 No. 09-10534

Gray H. Miller, United States District Judge *871Pending before the court is a motion to dismiss for improper venue, lack of personal jurisdiction, and failure to state a claim filed by defendants MidCap Financial Trust, f/k/a MidCap Financial, LLC ("MidCap Trust"), and MidCap Funding X Trust ("MidCap Funding") (collectively, "MidCap"). Dkt. 41, 42. This motion was orig

MURPHY, Circuit Judge. Defendants-appellants Tyson Foods, Inc. and Tyson Fresh Meats, Inc. (collectively, “Tyson”) appeal from the district court’s interlocutory order denying their motion for partial summary judgment. We ordered the parties to submit briefs addressing whether this appeal should be dismissed on the ground that the order appealed from was not final. Tyson argues that we have jurisdiction over the appeal under

NUMBER 13-03-350-CR COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 15-30309 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 3:98-cr-00572- MO-8 JOSE LUIS HERNANDEZ-MARTINEZ, AKA Efigenio Aispuro-Aispuro, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 15-30310

Case: 12-15738 Date Filed: 11/17/2014 Page: 1 of 26 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 12-15738 ________________________ D.C.

CALLAHAN, Circuit Judge, with whom IKUTA, Circuit Judge, joins, dissenting: The question in this habeas case is straight-forward: Under the federal extradition statute, 18 U.S.C. §§ 3181-3195, and the terms of the extradition treaty between the United States (“Government”) and Mexico, did the extradition judge err in excluding evidence that contradicts the Mexican government’s evidence of probable cause to be

Case: 12-15738 Date Filed: 04/01/2014 Page: 1 of 31 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 12-15738 ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 1:12-cv-22

517 F.3d 904 (2008) Francisco RAMIREZ-CANALES (05-4504); Jose Luis Garcia Correa (06-3990), Petitioners, v. Michael MUKASEY, Respondent. Nos. 05-4504, 06-3990. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Argued: October 23, 2007. Decided and Filed: February 27, 2008. *905 *906

SUMMARY ORDER ON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the *19judgment of the district court be and hereby is AFFIRMED. Defendants-appellants Fatima Solano and Jose Luis Garcia appeal their convictions pursuant to 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 841(b)(1)(A), and 846 for conspiring to distribute cocaine, arguing that the evidence was ins

256 F.Supp.2d 1345 (2003) SINALTRAINAL, the Estate of Isidro Segundo Gil, Plaintiffs, v. THE COCA-COLA COMPANY, et al., Defendants. Sinaltrainal, Jorge Humberto Leal Plaintiffs, v. The Coca-Cola Company, et al., Defendants. Sinaltrainal, Juan Carlos Galvis, Plaintiffs, v. The Coca-Cola Company, et al., Defendants. Sinaltrainal, Luis Eduardo Garcia, Alvaro Gonzalez, and Jose Domingo Flores, Plaintiffs, v. The Co

*1237 Opinion BOREN, P. J. The individual respondents are truck drivers who entered into “Independent Contractor Agreements” with appellant. After the individual respondents filed wage claims against appellant, appellant petitioned to compel arbitration based on arbitration provisi

STEWART, J. At issue in this case is a dispute between the public and property owners over the use of a road, parking area and the inland dry sand of a popular beach. There is no disagreement about defendants' ownership of these areas or the property of which they are a part. Rather, the public rights claimed by plaintiff are predicated on two theories. The first is that a provision of the California Constitution confers on the pu

*534 [As amended by order of the Court of Appeals December 9, 2015.] Schindler, J. ¶1 — Following a six-week trial, the jury convicted Jorge Luis Lizarraga of murder in the second degree of 18-year-old Devin Topps, two counts of unlawful possession of a firearm, residential burglary,

RAWLINSON, Circuit Judge, dissenting: I respectfully dissent. Martin Alcan-tara-Castillo (Alcantara) challenges his conviction for being a deported alien found in the United States in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Alcantara contends that a new trial is warranted because the government improperly compelled Alcantara to challenge the veracity of a government witness during the government’s cross-examination and