Cases

People v Caulfield (2025 NY Slip Op 01676) People v Caulfield 2025 NY Slip Op 01676 Decided on March 20, 2025 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

269 N.W.2d 350 (1978) STATE of Minnesota, Respondent, v. John Charles CAULFIELD, Appellant. No. 46813. Supreme Court of Minnesota. July 21, 1978. C. Paul Jones, Public Defender, Minneapolis, for appellant. Warren Spannaus, Atty. Gen., William Randall, County Atty., Steven C. DeCoster, Asst. County Atty., St. Paul, for respondent. Heard before KELLY, YE

OAKES, Circuit Judge. This appeal, yet another chapter in the litigation concerning hiring, assignment and promotion practices in the New York City school system,1 is from a final judgment *1002entered on July 17, 1979, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, Jack B. Weinstein, Judge, dismissin

LOWENSTEIN, Judge. The plaintiff Calvin Caulfield appeals from an adverse judgment in a court-tried case on his petition to recover funds in his profit sharing account, withheld by his former employer George K. Baum & Company (Company) and the trustee First National Bank. The trial court judgment is affirmed. The case was submitted on a stipulation of facts plus the testimony of Caulfield. The Company

PER CURIAM. This appeal comes here by virtue of a decree of the Circuit Court holding certain acts valid and constitutional. The Circuit Judge held the Statute valid and otherwise resolved the equities against plaintiff. Thereupon the two defendants took this appeal, complaining that the Court should have gone further and enjoined plaintiff from filing another suit. We find no merit in

RANDALL, Circuit Judge: Plaintiff Wayne Michael Caulfield was employed by AC & D Marine, Inc. as a pilot and relief captain aboard the M/V MAE-RINE D. On December 21, 1978, plaintiff was aboard the M/V MAERINE D and suffered injuries when he fell over an anchor. Immediately after the accident, plaintiff received emergency medi

TERRY, Senior Judge: Appellant Elvita Jones filed a two-count civil complaint against appellees, Dr. Thomas E. Clinch and his employer, Eye Doctors of Washington, P.C. (“Eye Doctors”).1 The first count asserted a medical malpractice claim, in which appellant alleged that Dr. Clinch had failed to obtain her informed consent before he performed an intraocular lens replacement surgery known as the “Cr

*1203ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS PER CURIAM. 11 This disciplinary matter arises from formal charges filed by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) against respondent, Charles D. Jones, an attorney licensed to practice law in Louisiana but currently on interim suspension based upon his conviction of a serious crime. In re: Jones,

PER CURIAM. |, This disciplinary matter arises from formal charges filed by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) against respondent, Johnnie Jones, Sr., an attorney licensed to practice law in Louisiana. PRIOR DISCIPLINARY HISTORY Before we address the current charges, we find it helpful to review respondent’s prior disciplinary history. Respondent was admitted to the practice of law in

700 F.Supp. 965 (1988) Cathy JONES, Individually and as Wife and Administrator of the Estate of Earl R. Jones, Deceased, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF DuPAGE, A Local Public Entity; Richard P. Doria, Individually and in his Official Capacity as Sheriff of DuPage County; Joseph Caulfield, Individually and in his Official Capacity as Deputy in Charge of Corrections for DuPage County Jail; Louis Cook, Individually and in his Official Capacity as Deputy Ja

This is an action in equity brought by respondents, who were plaintiffs below, to set aside a decree of the Juvenile Court of the City of St. Louis, Missouri, approving the adoption of appellant (defendant) by Nettie R. Francis, now deceased. A trial resulted in a finding and decree for defendant. Plaintiffs filed a motion for a new trial, which was sustained by the court. From the order granting a new trial defendant appeals. The petition of plaintiffs alleged that they are the sister

OPINION By JONES, J. As the term of the present incumbent of the bench is rapidly drawing to a close and a number of cases have been submitted for determination which it is desirable to have closed up before the expiration of such term, the court, while appreciating the careful presentation which many of these cases have had, will be as brief as possible in announcing the decision arrived at without takin

GORMAN, J. [¶ 1] Macie N. Jones appeals from a judgment of conviction for unlawful trafficking of a schedule W drug (Class B), 17-A M.R.S. §§ 1102(1)(A), 1103(1-A)(A) (2017), entered by the trial court (Aroos-took County, Stewart, J.) after a jury trial. Jones argues that 17-A M.R.S. § 1112 (2017) is facially unconstitutional and that the cour

952 So.2d 673 (2007) In re Hersy JONES, Jr. No. 2006-B-2702. Supreme Court of Louisiana. March 30, 2007. *674 ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS PER CURIAM. This disciplinary matter arises from formal charges filed by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel ("ODC") against respondent, Hersy Jones, Jr., an attorney lice

OAKES, Circuit Judge: On this consolidated appeal, the parties challenge two separate orders of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, Jack B. Weinstein, Judge. The first is an order of February 24, 1978, denying the motion of plaintiffs-appellants (appellants) who are New York City teachers, princip

859 So.2d 666 (2003) In re Johnnie A. JONES, Jr. No. 2002-B-3131. Supreme Court of Louisiana. October 21, 2003. *667 Charles B. Plattsmier, G. Fred Ours, Baton Rouge, Counsel for Applicant. Johnnie A. Jones, Jr., Lon E. Roberson, Baton Rouge, Counsel for Respondent. ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS PER CUR

*507ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS |,PER CURIAM. This disciplinary matter arises from formal charges filed by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) against respondent, Henry B. Jones, Jr., an attorney licensed to practice law in Louisiana but currently on interim suspension. UNDERLYING FACTS Counts I

OPINION MATTHEWS, District Judge. A suit for damages for the wrongful death1 of their minor child, Denise Wharton, has been filed by plaintiffs. They allege that while playing in the front yard of her home the child was injured due to the negligent operation of two automobiles, and that such injury resulted in the child’s death. The injury and death occurred on May 23,1964. Am

BURGER, Circuit Judge: This is an appeal from an order of the District Court dismissing an action instituted in the District Court for the reason that an action based on the same cause had been commenced and was pending in the District of Columbia Court of. General Sessions. Plaintiff first brought an action

293 F.2d 217 Siegent CAULFIELD, Appellant,v.U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, Agricultural Stabilization & Conservation Committee, Louisiana State Office and Executors of the Succession of W. T. Coats, Deceased, formerly d/b/a Wildwood Plantation, Appellees. No. 18429. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit. July 31, 1961. Rehearing D