Cases

131 P.3d 842 (2006) 204 Or. App. 710 STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. Cory Lynn SCHNEIDER, Appellant. C002925CR; A118922. Court of Appeals of Oregon. Petition for Reconsideration December 13, 2005. Resubmitted January 10, 2006. Decided March 22, 2006. *843 John Henry Hingso

ESCHBACH, Circuit Judge. On June 29, 1992, John Paul Miksis was changing a lightbulb in a traffic light as part of his summer job with Midwestern Electric. In order to reach the light, Miksis was suspended in the bucket of an aerial-lift truck. As he worked, a truck passing through the intersection knocked the bucket, hurling Miksis to the ground. Miksis sustained severe injurie

120 P.3d 16 (2005) 201 Or. App. 546 STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. Cory Lynn SCHNEIDER, Appellant. No. C002925CR; A118922. Court of Appeals of Oregon, En Banc. Argued and Submitted October 5, 2004. Resubmitted May 16, 2005. Decided September 21, 2005. *18 John Henry Hings

405 F.Supp.2d 1254 (2005) Susan Grace SCHNEIDER, Richard Harry Schneider, and, Robert Andries Schneider, As Trustees of the Revocable Trust of Janet S. Schneider dated October 26, 1987, as amended, Plaintiffs, and Susan Grace Schneider Richard Harry Schneider, and Robert Andries Schneider, in their capacities as Beneficiaries of the Revocable Trust of Janet S. Schneider dated October 26, 1987, as amended. Additional Plaintiffs, v. Henry H. CA

************************************************ The “officially released” date that appears near the beginning of an opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it is released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for the filing of postopin- ion motions and petitions for certification is the “offi- cially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical cor

637 N.W.2d 838 (2001) 247 Mich. App. 716 SCHNEIDER NATIONAL CARRIERS, INC., Schneider Transport, Inc., Schneider National Bulk Carriers, Inc., Schneider Tank Lines, Inc., and Schneider Specialized Carriers, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. STATE of Michigan, DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, Consumer and Industry Services Department and Michigan Public Service Commission, Defendants-Appellees. Docket No. 208346.

PER CURIAM. The Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission has charged Respondent, John D. Henry, in a complaint for disciplinary action with several violations of the Rules of Professional Conduct for Attorneys at Law and the preceding Code of Professional Responsibility. - The parties have reached an agreement and, pursuant to Admission and Discipline Rule 28, Section 11(d), have submitted for this Court's approval a Stat

190 F.Supp.2d 1082 (2002) B. Michael SCHNEIDER and Janine L. Bally, Plaintiffs, v. COUNTY OF WILL, STATE OF ILLINOIS, Will County Board Members Richard Brandolino, Richard Budde, William Bruin, W. Lee Deutsche, Mary Ann Gearhart, James Moustis, Glenn Warning, Ann Dralle, Susan Riley, Marianne Kozlik, Terri Wintermute, James Blackburn, Karen Callanan, John Gerl, James Gale, Kerry *1083 Sheridan, Stephen Wilhelm

SENTELLE, Circuit Judge. René and Raúl Schneider, surviving sons of deceased Chilean General René Schneider, together with José Pertierra, personal representative of the estate of General Schneider, brought this action in United States District Court for the District of Columbia against the United States and Henry Kissinger, who at the time of the relevant events was the Nationa

NOTICE: All slip opinions and orders are subject to formal revision and are superseded by the advance sheets and bound volumes of the Official Reports. If you find a typographical error or other formal error, please notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Judicial Court, John Adams Courthouse, 1 Pemberton Square, Suite 2500, Boston, MA, 02108-1750; (617) 557- 1030; SJCReporter@sjc.state.ma.us SJC-13609 SJC-13610 JOHN SCHNEIDER & others1 vs. ATTORNEY GENERAL & another.2 MAX

[Cite as Schneider v. Kumpf, 2016-Ohio-5161.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT MONTGOMERY COUNTY BARBARA SCHNEIDER : : Plaintiff-Appellant : Appellate Case No. 26955 : v.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ROBERT C. BRACK, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ Amended Motion for Summary Judgment filed on September B, 2015 (Doc. 30), and an affidavit from Plaintiffs counsel, which the Court construes as a motion for relief from the stay and for limited discovery (Doc. 39). Jurisdiction arises under 28 U.S.C. § 1331. Having

* Pursuant to rule 976.1 of the California Rules of Court, all portions of this opinion shall be published except parts I through VIII of the Discussion. [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 1265 OPINION Evidence Code section 892 is a part of the Uniform

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE SCHNEIDER NATIONAL CARRIERS, INC., ) ) Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. N21C-10-157-PAF ) RAYMOND J. KUNTZ, as Sellers’

ACCEPTED 13-15-00096-CV THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 10/21/2015 4:08:10 PM

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 417 OPINION Schneider was convicted of violating the Texas Securities Act by selling an unregistered security.1 The jury assessed punishment at seven years and a fine of $5,000. The complainant, William Harrell, testified that, during th

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Asotin County, No. 05-3-00141-0, John R. Henry, J. Pro Tern., entered September 8, 2009. Affirmed by unpublished opinion per Sweeney, J., concurred in by Kulik, C.J., and Brown, J.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 19, 2017 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

310 F.Supp.2d 251 (2004) Ren้ SCHNEIDER, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Henry A. KISSINGER, et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A. 01-1902(RMC). United States District Court, District of Columbia. March 30, 2004. *252 *253 Michael E. Tigar, Washington, DC, for Plaintiffs. Richard Montague, U.S. Departm

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-10-00191-CV Gary Wayne Jaster, Appellant v. Comet II Construction, Inc.; Joe H. Schneider; Laura H. Schneider; and Austin Design Group, Appellees FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF HAYS COUNTY, 274TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 08-0847, HONORABLE WILLIAM HENRY, JUD