Cases

700 S.E.2d 71 (2010) Raymond L. McGUIRE and wife, Roberta M. McGuire, Plaintiffs, v. David R. DIXON, and wife, Jean-Louise Dixon, Defendants. No. COA09-1536. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. October 5, 2010. *72 White & Allen, P.A., Kinston, by John P. Marshall, for plaintiff appellees. Dixon & Dixon Law Offices

G.B. Smith, J. (dissenting). The issue here is whether a subscribing witness to a nominating petition may be denied his First Amendment rights because he struck an unconstitutional provision from the subscribing portion of the petition before he signed it. Because the deletion was consistent with and even compelled by decisions of this Court and a federal appellate court, I dissent. This is a proceeding by Susan

Gorton, United States District Judge A group of relators in this matter ask the Court to order the United States Department of Justice and the Attorney General for the State of New York to deposit funds they hold designated as the relator's fee in the settlement agreement into the Court Registry Investment System. The Court will deny that request. In stipulating to the dismissal of the qui tam act

KANNE, Circuit Judge. David McGuire served in the United States Army during Operation Joint Endeavor in Bosnia. When he returned from active duty, he wanted to resume his former employment at United Parcel Service. After a series of communications with United Parcel Service, McGuire brought this suit under the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act of 1994. Th

Pfeifer, J., dissenting. {¶ 30} I do not quarrel with the majority’s technical analysis of the great writs, but that legal analysis resolves nothing. The citizens of Fostoria appear to have already addressed the merits of the issue by adopting a city charter that allows the selection of a police chief without a civil service exam. This litigation has gone on far too long; it’s time to stop the music and the le

McGuire v McGuire (2021 NY Slip Op 04817) McGuire v McGuire 2021 NY Slip Op 04817 Decided on August 26, 2021 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary L

McGuire v McGuire (2021 NY Slip Op 04816) McGuire v McGuire 2021 NY Slip Op 04816 Decided on August 26, 2021 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary L

*1195 OPINION GOULD, Circuit Judge. Defendants-Appellants John P. McGuire and Cherlyn Petersen were members of a group known as the Montana Freemen. They were convicted of bank fraud for participating in a scheme that involved printing bogus checks on a home computer and trying

946 S.W.2d 717 (1997) 58 Ark.App. 68 Lavenia McGUIRE and Roderick McGuire, Appellants, v. Edith SMITH, Personal Representative of the Estate of George McGuire, Appellee. No. CA 96-340. Court of Appeals of Arkansas, Divisions I, II. June 11, 1997. *718 John David Myers, Little Rock, for Appellants. R

GREENE, Judge. David C. Van Every (plaintiff) appeals an order awarding Kelly McGuire’s (defendant) counsel $55,688.35 in attorney’s fees, $3,163.50 to the guardian ad litem, and $390.00 for expert witness fees. The undisputed facts are that plaintiff and defendant were married in 1988 and divorced in 1992. One child was born to the marriage in 1989. A dispute arose with regard to the custody of the child a

[Cite as McGuire v. Mansfield, 2025-Ohio-1961.] COURT OF APPEALS RICHLAND COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT ROBERT MCGUIRE, ET AL. : JUDGES: : Hon. Andrew J. King, P.J. Plaintiffs-Appellees : Hon. Kevin W. Popham, J. : Ho

SUMMARY ORDER UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the judgment of the district court entered on February 18, 2004, is hereby AFFIRMED. Plaintiffs, each of whom was arrested in New York City for the unlicensed operation of a motor vehicle in the third degree pursuant to N.Y. Vehicle & Traffic Law § 511(1),2 appeal from an award of summary judgment dis

If this opinion indicates that it is “FOR PUBLICATION,” it is subject to revision until final publication in the Michigan Appeals Reports. STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, FOR PUBLICATION October 28, 2024 Plaintiff-Appellee, 1

253 F.Supp.2d 988 (2003) Raymond McGUIRE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. AMERITECH SERVICES, INC., et al., Defendants. No. C-3-99-661. United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division. January 15, 2003. *991 Jon Paul Rion, John ถ Rion and Associates, David Michael Deutsch, David M Deutsch Co., LPA, Dayton, OH, for Plaintiffs.

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-1005 VIRGINIA URANIUM, INC.; COLES HILL, LLC; BOWEN MINERALS, LLC; VIRGINIA ENERGY RESOURCES, INC., Plaintiffs – Appellants, v. JOHN WARREN, in his official capacity as Director of the Virginia Department of Mines, Minerals and Energy; BRA

847 S.W.2d 684 (1993) Susie McGowan McGUIRE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee. No. 01-91-01455-CR. Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (1st Dist.). February 18, 1993. *685 Larry Preston Walton, Houston, for appellant. John B. Holmes, Jr., Dist. Atty., Karen A. Clark, David Wade, Asst. Dist. Attys., Houston, for ap

159 F.3d 460 4 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 1736,98 Daily Journal D.A.R. 11,183,98 Daily Journal D.A.R. 8052 Michael T. McGUIRE; James P. Klum; Grant Coffey; PatrickA. Dooney; Jerry L. Ivie; Robert L. Voris; Delmar S.Stevens; Ronald C. Harris; Darryl F. Cornelius; Terry M.Kandle; Howard W. Boyte, Jr.; George R. Jacobsen; DavidM. Disciascio; John S. Bisenius; Robert L. Eurick,Pla

GOODWIN, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff-Appellants, past and present battalion chiefs in the City of Portland’s Fire Bureau, sued the city for overtime pay under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 201-19 (1994) (“FLSA”). Earlier proceedings resulted in a remand for reconsideration in light of Auer v. Robbins, 519 U.S. 452, 117 S.Ct. 905, 137 L.Ed.2d 79 (1997). The district court granted the City’s motion for summa

[Cite as State v. McGuire, 2018-Ohio-1390.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 105732 STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs.

[Cite as McGuire v. Newark, 2020-Ohio-4226.] COURT OF APPEALS LICKING COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT KAYLA MCGUIRE : JUDGES: : : Hon. W. Scott Gwin, P.J. Plaintiff-Appellant : Hon. John W. Wise, J.