Cases

PER CURIAM: This is an appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Joseph C. Zavatt, J.) entered June 25, 1971 after a jury trial, which judgment convicted appellant of two counts of bank robbery. We affirm. Appellant does not challenge the sufficiency

788 F.Supp.2d 50 (2011) Rosa ABBATE, Plaintiff, v. NORTHLAND AEG, LLC, Timothy Formanski, Peter Riccitelli, and Theodore Puzycki, Defendants. No. 3:09-cv-1607 (CSH). United States District Court, D. Connecticut. May 31, 2011. *51 A. Alan Sheffy, Kelly J. Saucier, Sheffy Mazzaccaro DePaolo & Dunham, Southington, CT, for Plaint

MaddeN, Judge, delivered the opinion of the court: The plaintiffs were civilian employees of the New York Naval Shipyard at Brooklyn, New York. They were per diem employees who occupied supervisory positions. They were entitled to the benefits of the Veterans’ Preference Act of 1944, 58 Stat. 387, as amended; 61 Stat. 501; 62 Stat. 1233; 63 Stat. 666; 5 U. S. C. 851. At various dates in 1946 or 1947 the severa

DANIEL KELLY, J. *712¶ 1 Marquette University suspended a tenured faculty member because of a blog post criticizing an encounter between an instructor and a student. Dr. John McAdams took exception to his suspension, and brought a claim against the University for breach of contract. He asserts that the contract guarantees to him the right to

Appellant John Turner asks us to overrule nearly four decades of circuit precedent holding that the Sixth Amendment right to counsel does not extend to preindictment plea negotiations. See United States v. Moody , 206 F.3d 609 , 614-15 (6th Cir. 2000) (citing Un

Per Curiam. Action to recover damages for the death of plaintiff’s intestate, in which there was a verdict of the jury for respondents. By questions to plaintiff’s witnesses on cross-examination, and by reference to plaintiff’s counsel and his associate, counsel for respondents clearly intended to discredit plaintiff and her witnesses with the jury because of their nationality. Even if done in good faith, it

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA Present: Judges O’Brien, Ortiz and Raphael PUBLISHED Argued at Richmond, Virginia JOHN E. NESTLER, M.D. AND STEPHANIE CALL, M.D. v. Record No. 0497-22-2 TIZIANO SCARABELLI, M.D., HARRIS D. BUTLER, III AND BUTLER CURWOOD, PLC OPINION BY

2018 WI 88 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2017AP1240 COMPLETE TITLE: John McAdams, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Marquette University, Defendant-Respondent. ON BYPASS FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OPINION FILED: July 6, 2018

Opinion for the Court filed by Senior Circuit Judge EDWARDS. *568 HARRY T. EDWARDS, Senior Circuit Judge. Plaintiffs-appellees (“plaintiffs”) represent a class of individuals arrested by the District of Columbia’s Metropolitan Police Department (“MPD”) during the morning of a larg

994 F.2d 333 125 Lab.Cas. P 35,808, 1 Wage & Hour Cas.2d(BNA) 657 Julie ALEXANDER, Carmel G. Abbate, Bozeman Anderson, et al.,Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.CITY OF CHICAGO, a municipal corporation, Defendant-Appellee. Nos. 92-1441, 92-1442 and 92-1448. United States Court of Appeals,Seventh Circuit. Argued Nov. 9, 1992.Deci

American Empire Surplus Lines Ins. Co. v Commerce & Indus. Ins. Co. (2023 NY Slip Op 06197) American Empire Surplus Lines Ins. Co. v Commerce & Indus. Ins. Co. 2023 NY Slip Op 06197 Decided on November 30, 2023 Appellate Division, First Department

Great Neck Lib. v Kaeyer, Garment & Davidson Architects, P.C. (2025 NY Slip Op 01613) Great Neck Lib. v Kaeyer, Garment & Davidson Architects, P.C. 2025 NY Slip Op 01613 Decided on March 19, 2025 Appellate Division, Second Department

Davis v Farrell Fritz, P.C. (2022 NY Slip Op 00399) Davis v Farrell Fritz, P.C. 2022 NY Slip Op 00399 Decided on January 26, 2022 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pu

PICKETT, Circuit Judge. Tyler appeals from a conviction on an indictment charging him with the interstate transportation of Velma Marie Powell for prostitution, debauchery and other immoral purposes in violation of the Mann Act, 18 U.S.C. § 2421. The principal questions presented on appeal are the denial of a motion for a continuanc

HALL, Circuit Judge: I. BACKGROUND This case is a part of a longstanding conflict within the East Ramapo School District (the “District”) in Rockland County, New York. The Plaintiffs-Appellees (“Student-Plaintiffs”) are students who are currently enrolled in the District’s public school system. They allege that a majority of the East Ramapo School District Board (“School Board”) are of the Orthodox/Ha-sidic Jew

338 F.Supp.2d 48 (2004) Jeffrey BARHAM, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Charles H. RAMSEY, et al., Defendants. Julie Abbate, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Charles H. Ramsey, et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A. 02-2283(EGS), No. CIV.A. 03-767(EGS). United States District Court, District of Columbia. September 24, 2004. *49

949 F.2d 1465 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Brian BAFIA, Michael Kerridan, John Cappas and PhilipLaPorta, Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 89-2167, 89-2168, 89-2322, 89-2414 and 89-2561. United States Court of Appeals,Seventh Circuit. Argued April 5, 1991.Decided Dec. 10, 1991.Rehearing Denied Dec. 27, 1991 in No. 89-2167.Rehearing Den

721 F.Supp.2d 307 (2010) SYNDICATE 1245 AT LLOYD'S, Plaintiff, v. WALNUT ADVISORY CORPORATION, et al., Defendants. Civil No. 09-1697 (FLW). United States District Court, D. New Jersey. June 24, 2010. *309 Robert F. Priestley, Timothy Michael Jabbour, Mendes & Mount, LLP, Newark, NJ, for Plaintiff. Gretchen Beth Connard

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER SULLIVAN, District Judge. This Memorandum Opinion and Order resolves pending motions for consolidation and class certification. These four cases concern the events of September 27, 2002, when approximately 3000 to 5000 people joined in demonstrations in the District of Columbia protesting the policies of the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund, and the

703 F.Supp.2d 313 (2010) John DOE, American Civil Liberties Union, and American Civil Liberties Union Foundation, Plaintiffs, v. Eric HOLDER, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the United States et al., Defendants. No. 04 Civ. 2614 (VM). United States District Court, S.D. New York. March 18, 2010. *314 Ann Beeson, Ar