Cases

NUMBER 13-19-00507-CR COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG JOAQUIN MORALES, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee. On appeal from the 111th District Court

WILLIAM A. FLETCHER, Circuit Judge. Petitioner Jose Joaquin Sinotes-Cruz petitions for review from an order of removal. We hold that the government has introduced sufficient evidence to carry its burden of proof that Sinotes-Cruz is removable. We also hold, based on INS v. St. Cyr, 533 U.S. 289, 121 S.Ct. 2271, 150 L.Ed.2d 347 (2001), that the permanent sto

USCA1 Opinion March 12, 1993 [NOT FOR PUBLICATION] [NOT FOR PUBLICATION] UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT No. 92-2284 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee,

363 F.Supp.2d 30 (2005) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff(s) v. Johnny LAZU-RIVERA, et al., Defendant(s) United States of America, Plaintiff(s) v. Felix Carlos Egipciaco Figueroa, et al., Defendant(s) United States of America, Plaintiff(s) v. Felix Rafael Egipciaco Figueroa, et al., Defendant(s) United States of America, Plaintiff(s) v. Anibal Fernandez-Tavarez, et al., Defendant(s). Cri

175 F.Supp.2d 129 (2001) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff v. [05] Martires Paulino CASTRO, [08] Esteban Martinez García, [23] Carlos Valdes, Defendants Criminal No. 00-0693(PG). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. November 14, 2001. *130 Miriam R. Ramos-Grateroles, San Juan, for Rafael Reynoso-De-La-Cruz. Marl

GARWOOD, Circuit Judge: This is a petition for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“the Board”) denying petitioners’ application for suspension of deportation under section 244(a)(1) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1254(a)(1). The primary questions are whether the Board failed to consider the non

MOORE, Circuit Judge: After a jury trial, defendants Herminio Cortes Rivera (Cortes) and Orlando M. Cepeda Penes (Cepeda), were convicted of possessing with intent to distribute about 170 pounds of marijuana. Cepeda was also convicted of importation of the drug; Cortes was acquitted on that count. Both defendants have filed separate appeals from the judgments of conviction entered against them; Cortes also appeals from an or

Leval, Circuit Judge: Defendants Joaquin Alarcon Prado, Hector Valencia Bautista, and Luis Armando Valencia Bautista appeal from the judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Jed S. Rakoff, J. ), convicting them, on their pleas of guilty, of conspiracy to

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ADREE EDMO, AKA Mason Edmo, No. 22-35876 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 1:17-cv-00151- v. BLW CORIZON, INC.; SCOTT ELIASON; IDAHO DEPARTMENT OF OPINION CORRECTION; HENRY ATENCIO; JEFF ZUMDA; HOWARD KEITH YORDY; RICHARD CRAIG; RONA SIEGERT,

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

MEMORANDUM OPINION BERYL A. HOWELL, United States District Judge Defendants Alfredo Mosquera-Murillo, Joaquin Chang-Rendon, and Antonio Moreno-Membache (collectively, the “defendants”) are charged in a one-count indictment of conspiring to distribute, and possess with intent to distribute, at least five kilograms of cocaine and 100 kilograms of marijuana, on board a vessel subject to the jurisd

OPINION AND ORDER JUAN M. PEREZ-GIMENEZ, District Judge. Plaintiff Lourdes del Rosario Fontanillas Lopez (hereinafter “Plaintiff’ or “Fontanillas”), along with her parents Mildred Milagros Lopez and Luis Alfredo Fontanillas,1 filed this action pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C.A. § 2000e et seq. (“Title VII”), against Plaintiffs fo

ACCEPTED 15-25-00140-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 9/10/2025 9:12 AM

* Pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 8.1110, this opinion is certified for publication with the exception of part III of the Discussion. [EDITORS' NOTE: TEXT NOT CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION APPEARS WITH GRAY BACKGROUND BELOW.] [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 950

STAHL, Senior Circuit Judge. Appellee Maria de los Angeles Rivera Rangel (“Rivera”) used her position as an executive assistant to the Governor of Puerto Rico to help four contractors — Jose Ventura Asilis (“Ventura”), Angel Ocasio Ramos (“Ocasio”), Joaquin Arbona (“Arbo-na”), and Edwin Loubriel (“Loubriel”)— gain access to government officials and obtain expedited treatment of th

JOSÉ A. CABRANES, Circuit Judge, concurring: I concur fully in Chief Judge Walker’s opinion, in which Judge Calabresi also joins, and write briefly to address further Zhang’s jurisdictional arguments and the analysis of Judge Calabresi in his separate opinion.1 To qualify for a waiver of inadmissibility under 8 U.S.C. § 1182(i)(l), a petitioner is required to d

* Pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 8.1110, this opinion is certified for publication with the exception of parts II through IV of the Discussion. [EDITORS' NOTE: TEXT NOT CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION APPEARS WITH GRAY BACKGROUND BELOW.] [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Pa

459 F.3d 1121 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Ruben CAMPA, a.k.a. John Doe 3, a.k.a. Vicky, a.k.a. Camilo, a.k.a. Oscar, Rene Gonzalez, a.k.a. Iselin, a.k.a. Castor, Gerardo Hernandez, a.k.a. Giro, a.k.a. Manuel Viramontez, a.k.a. John Doe 1, a.k.a. Manuel Viramontes, Luis Medina, a.k.a. Oso, a.k.a. Johnny, a.k.a. Allan, a.k.a. John Doe 2, Antonio Guerrero, a.k.a. Rolando Gonzalez-Diaz, a.k.a. Lorient, Defendants-Appellants.<

935 F.Supp. 393 (1996) UNITED STATES of America, v. Joseph DEVERY and Joaquin Rivera, Defendants. No. 93 Crim. 273 (LAP). United States District Court, S.D. New York. July 29, 1996. *394 *395 *396 *397 Tai H. Park, Assis

128 Cal.Rptr.2d 794 (2002) 104 Cal.App.4th 915 The PEOPLE, Petitioner, v. The SUPERIOR COURT of Imperial County, Respondent; Manuel G., Real Party in Interest. No. D038525. Court of Appeal, Fourth District, Division One. November 26, 2002. Review Denied February 25, 2003. *796 Bill Loc