⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “JOAN M ROMERO”

Romero v. Patakipublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007-09-19 · Published · cited 5× · 241 F. App'x 764
SUMMARY ORDER Plaintiff-Appellant Jose Antonio Romero appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Pauley, J.) granting Defendants-Appellees’ motion to dismiss. The district court dismissed the complaint, in which Romero challenged the constitutionality of New York Executive Law Section 682-a (McKinney 2007) (the “Son of Sam” law) and raised claims of conspiracy and deliberate indi
Tribunal De Apelaciones De Puerto Rico/Court of Appeals of Puerto Rico · 2024-05-24 · Published · cited 0×
Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL I JOAN M. MORALES Revisión COSME procedente de la Oficina de Recurrente KLRA202400107 Apelaciones del Sistema de v. Educación DEPARTAMENTO DE
District Court, D. New Mexico · 2011-08-08 · Published · cited 0× · 805 F. Supp. 2d 1145; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 95203; 2011 WL 3702413
805 F.Supp.2d 1145 (2011) Victoria STARK-ROMERO, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Fred P. Stark, Plaintiff, and Emilio J. Esquibel and Helen G. Esquibel, Individually and as Co-Personal Representatives of the Estate of Michael S. Esquibel, deceased, Plaintiff-Intervenors, v. The NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER COMPANY (AMTRAK), Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Company (BNSF), City of Las Vegas, San Miguel County an
District Court, D. New Mexico · 2011-01-12 · Published · cited 10× · 763 F. Supp. 2d 1231; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11613; 2011 WL 395442
763 F.Supp.2d 1231 (2011) Victoria STARK-ROMERO, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Fred P. Stark, Plaintiff, and Emilio J. Esquibel and Helen G. Esquibel, Individually and as Co-Personal Representatives of the Estate of Michael S. Esquibel, deceased, Plaintiff-Intervenors, v. The NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER COMPANY (Amtrak), Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Company (BNSF), City of Las Vegas, San Miguel County an
District Court, D. New Mexico · 2011-07-14 · Published · cited 11× · 275 F.R.D. 551; 80 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 309; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 80322; 2011 WL 2944760
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES O. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Defendant BNSF Railway Company’s Motion to Compel Answers to Requests for Admission, filed May 25, 2011 (Doc. 88). The Court held a hearing on July 6, 2011. The primary issues are: (i) whether the Court should deem admitted certain requests for admission (“RFA”) that Defendant BNSF Railway Co
District Court, D. New Mexico · 2011-07-14 · Published · cited 26× · 275 F.R.D. 544; 2011 WL 2944134
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES O. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Plaintiffs’ Motion to Extend Deadlines and Request for Expedited Briefing, filed June 9, 2011 (Doe. 90). The Court held a hearing on July 6, 2011. The primary issues are: (i) whether the Court should order expedited briefing on Plaintiff Emilio J. Esqui-bel’s and Helen G. Esquibel’s motion; an
District Court, D. New Mexico · 2011-08-18 · Published · cited 0× · 276 F.R.D. 531; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 95409; 2011 WL 3702441
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES 0. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Plaintiffs-Intervenors’ Motion to Compel the National Railroad Passenger Company a/k/a Amtrak and BNSF Railway Company to Fully Respond to Discovery, filed June 23, 2011 (Doc. 98). The Court held a hearing on July 14, 2011. The primary issue is whether the Court should compel Defendants The
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2024-12-04 · Published · cited 0× · 2024 NY Slip Op 06041
Matter of Euceda v Romero (2024 NY Slip Op 06041) Matter of Euceda v Romero 2024 NY Slip Op 06041 Decided on December 4, 2024 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law §
People v. Romeropublic domain
California Supreme Court · 1994-11-10 · Published · cited 233× · 883 P.2d 388; 8 Cal. 4th 728; 35 Cal. Rptr. 2d 270; 94 Daily Journal DAR 15948; 94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8601; 1994 Cal. LEXIS 6028
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 730 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 731 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAY
Washington Supreme Court · 2019-05-16 · Published · cited 43× · 440 P.3d 994; 193 Wash. 2d 341
STEPHENS, J. *343 ¶1 A jury convicted Leonel Romero-Ochoa of burglary, unlawful imprisonment, assault, and multiple *344 counts of rape, arising from an incident in which he broke into a wo
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994-10-19 · Published · cited 49× · 38 F.3d 1204; 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 29132; 1994 WL 570581
ARCHER, Chief Judge. Pedro Romero et al. (Romero), the American Federation of Government Employees, AFL-CIO, et al. (AFGE), and the American Postal Workers Union, AFL-CIO, et al. (APWU), appeal from the summary judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Puerto Rico, Civil Nos. 89-0412(JAF), 90-1117(JAF) and 90-1173(JAF) (May 28, 1991). The district court upheld the validity of
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014-03-11 · Published · cited 0× · 115 A.D.3d 496; 981 N.Y.S.2d 696
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Joan M. Kenney, J.), entered April 25, 2013, which granted defendant 2024 Second Avenue LLC’s motion to vacate the default judgment entered against it, unanimously affirmed, without costs. The motion court exercised its discretion in a provident manner in granting defendant’s motion. The unexplained delay of defendant’s insurance broker in forwarding the summons and complaint to defendant’s insuran
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014-03-11 · Published · cited 5× · 115 A.D.3d 496; 981 N.Y.S.2d 696
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Joan M. Kenney, J.), entered April 25, 2013, which granted defendant 2024 Second Avenue LLC’s motion to vacate the default judgment entered against it, unanimously affirmed, without costs. The motion court exercised its discretion in a provident manner in granting defendant’s motion. The unexplained delay of defendant’s insurance broker in forwarding the summons and complaint to defendant’s insuran
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004-01-23 · Published · cited 238× · 356 F.3d 688; 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 982; 2004 WL 103013
OPINION GIBSON, Circuit Judge. The district court 1 granted Paula McFarland a conditional writ of habeas *692 corpus on the ground that the attorney-defending McFarland against drug charges labored under a conflict
R.F.M. v. Nielsenpublic domain
District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019-03-15 · Published · cited 23× · 365 F. Supp. 3d 350
JOHN G. KOELTL, District Judge: The plaintiffs, R.F.M., T.D., S.W., D.A.F.A., and O.M.S., are young immigrants who have been determined by the New York State Family Court ("New York Family Court" or "Family Court") to have been abused, abandoned, or neglected by one or both of their parents. Each plaintiff has sought Special Immigrant Juvenile ("SIJ") status -- a form of immigration relief that provides a path to lawful permanent re
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2025-12-24 · Published · cited 0× · 2025 NY Slip Op 07308
Matter of Saul E. M. L. v Edmundo M. M. (2025 NY Slip Op 07308) Matter of Saul E. M. L. v Edmundo M. M. 2025 NY Slip Op 07308 Decided on December 24, 2025 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso) · 2025-12-19 · Published · cited 0×
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS ———————————— No. 08-24-00015-CR ———————————— EX PARTE JOAN SEBASTIAN PENA CORTES On Appeal from the County Court Kinney County, Texas
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2026-05-13 · Published · cited 0× · 2026 NY Slip Op 02983
Matter of Jefferson D.O.M. (Maria T.M.S.) 2026 NY Slip Op 02983 May 13, 2026 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This decision is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. In the Matter of Jefferson D. O. M. (Anonymous), also known as Jefferson J. A. M. (Anonymous), appellant. M
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015-04-17 · Published · cited 0× · 783 F.3d 441; 2015 WL 1741451
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ________ No. 12-4574 _________ ROY LANGBORD; DAVID LANGBORD; JOAN LANGBORD v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY; UNITED STATES BUREAU OF THE MINT; SECRETARY OF THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY; ACTING GENERAL COUNSEL OF THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE T
New Mexico Supreme Court · 1988-09-08 · Published · cited 3× · 760 P.2d 1282; 107 N.M. 516
760 P.2d 1282 (1988) 107 N.M. 516 Arlene ROMERO, as Mother and Next Friend of Gilbert Troy Romero, a Minor, Petitioner, v. NEW MEXICO HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT DEPARTMENT, and Health and Social Services Department, both formerly New Mexico Health and Social Services Department, Respondents. No. 17527. Supreme Court of New Mexico. September 8, 1988.