Cases

2023 IL App (3d) 210606 Opinion filed February 23, 2023 ____________________________________________________________________________ IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS THIRD DISTRICT

ACCEPTED 01-14-00104-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS

Crothers, Justice. [¶ 1] Statoil Oil & Gas LP appeals from judgments dismissing without prejudice its actions against numerous defendants, seeking a determination of the proper distribution of oil and gas revenues from Williams and McKenzie County wells on land adjacent to the Missouri River and under Lake Sakakawea. We affirm, concluding the district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing the actions because Stato

Filed 6/16/17 by Clerk of Supreme Court IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2017 ND 148 Statoil Oil & Gas LP, Plaintiff and Appellant v. Abaco Energy, LLC; American H

ACCEPTED 15-25-00016-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

ACCEPTED 15-25-00016-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 2/13/2025 11:51 AM No. 15-25-00016-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE CL

ORDER GRANTING REVISED MOTION TO DISMISS Susan Oki Mollway, Chief United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION. This case arises out of a decision by Defendant State of Hawaii Land Use Commission (the “Commission”) to reclassify a parcel of land from urban use to agricul*1055tura! use. Plaintiff Bridge Aina Le’a, LLC (“Bridge”),

ACCEPTED 01-15-00390-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 6/12/2015 9:25:40 PM

ACCEPTED 14-14-00706-cv FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 4/6/2015 11:22:02 PM C

INTHECOURTOF APPEALS Fl:LED J:N FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS Court of Appeals Jt;N 0 7 2018 Lis2 Matz Clerk 1 5th District CAUSE NO. 05-16-00784-CV TONY A PARKS & PARKS REALTY FIRM, LLC

ACCEPTED 03-14-00738-CV 5659032 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

ACCEPTED 03-14-00738-CV SEE AMENDED BRF 5648230 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS FILED ON 6/15/15 AUSTIN, TEXAS

ACCEPTED 03-14-00738-CV 5659167 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

ACCEPTED 01-15-00867-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Derick Ortiz, v. Civil No. 19-cv-1025-JL Opinion No. 2023 DNH 015 Sig Sauer, Inc. MEMORANDUM ORDER The class action “predominance” requirement in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(b)(3), as applied to fraudulent concealment

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS IN PART ALLISON D. BURROUGHS, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE f Plaintiff Damian Medici filed his complaint on February 17, 2016, alleging that Defendants violated contractual obligations and federal regulations while investigating him for research misconduct, resulting in the loss of his employment and research grants. [ECF No',1' lj. On Ap

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Kevin Brown, et al. v. Civil No. 16-cv-242-JL Opinion No. 2017 DNH 246 Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corp., et al. MEMORANDUM ORDER Resolution of the defendants’ motions to dismiss this environmental trespass action turns on whether the plaintiffs have pleaded injuries recognized by New Hamp

Hon. Janis L. Sammartino, United States District Judge Presently before the Court are three motions to dismiss. First, Defendants Lion Capital LLP, Big Catch Cayman LP, and Lion Capital (Americas), Inc. (the "Lion Defendants," "Lion Entities," or "Defendants") filed a Motion to Dismiss the Cherokee Nation's Complaint, (ECF No. 997). Plaintiff the Cherokee Nation's filed an Opposition to, ("Nation Opp'n," ECF No. 1233), the Motion.</

ORDER AND OPINION J. MICHELLE CHILDS, United States District Court Judge The State of South Carolina (“the State”) filed a Complaint (ECF No. 1) alleging that Defendants United States, the United States Department of Energy (“DOE”), Dr. Ernest Moniz, the National Nuclear Security Administration (“NNSA”), and Lieutenant General Frank G. Klotz (collectively “Defendants”) failed to adhere to statutory obliga

*1053ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ REMAINING MOTIONS TO DISMISS Hon. Janis L. Sammartino, United States District Judge Presently before the Court are: (1) Defendant Thai Union Group PCL’s Motion to Dismiss (“TUG MTD”) (ECF No. 205) all claims asserted against Thai Union in the: (a) Consolid