Cases

ACCEPTED 15-24-00077-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

PER CURIAM [¶1] Scott L. appeals from a judgment of the District Court (Waterville, Montgomery, J. ) terminating his parental rights to his child pursuant to 22 M.R.S. § 4055(1)(B)(2)(a), (b)(ii) (2018). 1 He challenges the court's determination that termination of his parental rights is in the child's best

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan May 9, 2018 Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice 157589-640 & (17) Brian K. Zahra

ACCEPTED 15-24-00077-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 2/10/2025 3:56 PM No. 15-24-00077-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE _________________________________________________

WOLLMAN, Circuit Judge. The Minnesota Department of Public Safety (DPS) maintains a database of driver’s license data (DPS database). It is the alleged misuse of that database information which is the subject of these appeals. A number of Minnesota driver’s license holders (plaintiffs) brought suit against numerous cities, counties, and other government entities (local entities); numerous unknown law enfo

HENRY COKE MORGAN, JR., SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This matter is before the Court pursuant to six (6) Motions: • Peninsula Airport Commission ("PAC") Defendants'1 Motion to take Judicial Notice, Doc. 9; • PAC Defendants' Second Motion to Take Judicial Notice, Doc. 14; • PAC Defendants' Motions to Dis

Chief Judge Rubén Castillo *1070Daniel L. Ayotte ("Plaintiff") filed this action in the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois, alleging claims against a host of defendants, including The Boeing Company ("Boeing"), arising from his exposure to asbestos. (R. 1-1, Compl.) Boeing removed the action to this Court. (R. 1, Notice of Removal.) Before the Court is Plaintiff'

*287 MEMORANDUM OPINION BERYL A. HOWELL, District Judge. The plaintiff, Greg Muttitt, brings this action against the U.S. Department of State (the “State Department”) pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”), 5 U.S.C. § 552. The plaintiff is an author who sough

27 Cal.App.4th 276 (1994) 32 Cal. Rptr.2d 494 THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. TRACY ARTHUR STONE, Defendant and Appellant. Docket No. A061456. Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Three. August 3, 1994. *279 COUNSEL Kyle Gee, under appointment by Court of Appeal, for Def

21-2019 Bartlett v. Baasiri In the United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit August Term, 2022 No. 21-2019 ROBERT BARTLETT, TERREL CHARLES BARTLETT, LINDA JONES, SHAWN BARTLETT, MAXINE E. CROCKETT, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF THE ESTATE OF RICKY LEON CROCKETT, MARVISE L. CROCKETT, TRACIE ARSIAGA, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF THE ESTATE OF ROBERT R. ARSIAG

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the April 17, 2018 orders of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should now be reviewed by this Court.

Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a (2021 NY Slip Op 05388) BODY { font-family : "Times New Roman", Times, serif; font-size : larger; } P { line-height: 150%; text-indent: 2em } Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law  468-a

Appendix A Department of Justice Chart Documenting Sentences in Capitol Breach Cases Monday, January 6, 2025 SENTENCES IMPOSED IN CASES ARISING OUT OF THE EVENTS OF JANUARY 6, 2021 Disclaimer: Those relying on information contained in this document should verify all information for accuracy Table 1: Cases in which the government recommended a probation sentence without home detention 1 0F Defendant Ca

Matter of Attorneys Inviolation of Judiciary Law § 468-a (2024 NY Slip Op 04648) Matter of Attorneys Inviolation of Judiciary Law § 468-a 2024 NY Slip Op 04648 Decided on September 26, 2024 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by

NOTICE: The attorneys on the attached list have the opportunity to comply with outstanding requirements prior to the effective date of the Supreme Court Order and not be administratively suspended. The current license status of a Pennsylvania attorney can be found on the Disciplinary Board’s website. https://www.padisciplinaryboard.org/for-the- public/find-attorney Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Attorneys Certified for Administrative Suspensi

17-2208, 18-359 Scott v. Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term 2018 (Argued: February 13, 2019 Decided: April 1, 2020) Nos. 17-2208-cv, 18-359-cv MAXCIMO SCOTT, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated, JAY FRANCIS ENSOR, CHRISTIN

HALL, Circuit Judge: I. BACKGROUND This case is a part of a longstanding conflict within the East Ramapo School District (the “District”) in Rockland County, New York. The Plaintiffs-Appellees (“Student-Plaintiffs”) are students who are currently enrolled in the District’s public school system. They allege that a majority of the East Ramapo School District Board (“School Board”) are of the Orthodox/Ha-sidic Jew

909 N.E.2d 415 (2009) In the Matter of FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS and/or NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES. No. 94S00-0905-MS-210. Supreme Court of Indiana. May 5, 2009. ORDER OF SUSPENSION OF CERTAIN ATTORNEYS FOR FAILURE TO PAY ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES and/or FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIRE

ORDER OF SUSPENSION OF CERTAIN ATTORNEYS FOR FAILURE TO PAY ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES and/or FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS RANDALL T. SHEPARD, Chief Justice. The Clerk of the Court has notified this Court that certain attorneys have failed either to pay the annual registration fee required for them to be lieensed to practice law in Indiana, or to file an exemption affidavit as contem

[Cite as 07/01/2002 Case Announcements, 2002-Ohio-3343.] The Supreme Court of Ohio CASE ANNOUNCEMENTS AND ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS July 1, 2002 DISCIPLINARY CASES 2001-0412. Cleveland Bar Assn. v. Cleary. Patricia A. Cleary is reinstated to the practice of law. MISCELLANEOUS DISMISSALS 2002-0902. Butcher v. Lewis. Stark App. No. 2001CA00219, 2002-Ohi