Cases

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA TIMOTHY L. JENKINS, et al. : : Plaintiffs, : Civil Action No.: 22-0874 (RC) : v. : Re Document Nos.: 7, 18 : HOWARD UNIVE

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued September 19, 2024 Decided December 20, 2024 No. 23-7093 TIMOTHY L. JENKINS, ET AL., APPELLANTS v. HOWARD UNIVERSITY AND HOWARD UNIVERSITY BOARD OF TRUSTEES, APPELLEES Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columb

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER RANDOLPH D. MOSS, United States District Judge This case is before the Court on Defendant Howard University Hospital’s (“Howard”) motion for summary judgment. See Dkt. 12. Plaintiff Fannie Brown was 60 years old when she began working for Howard as the Director of Graduate Medical Education (“GME”) in Janu

JUDGMENT PER CURIAM. This cause was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, and was briefed and argued by counsel. It is Ordered and Adjudged that the judgment of the District Court be affirmed for the reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum. Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this dispositi

601 F.Supp.2d 1 (2009) Vijayakumar MOSES, Plaintiff, v. HOWARD UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL, Defendant. Civil Action No. 01-2528 (PLF). United States District Court, District of Columbia. February 19, 2009. *2 Vijayakumar Moses, Riverdale, MD, pro se. Heidi L. Gunst, Mary A. House, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, LLP, Janet M.

598 F.Supp.2d 36 (2009) Rossi M. POTTS, Plaintiff, v. HOWARD UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL and Howard University, Defendants. Civil Action No. 08-0706 (RMU). United States District Court, District of Columbia. February 20, 2009. *37 Rossi M. Potts, Upper Marlboro, MD, pro se. Elbert Lindsey Maxwell, Intersect Law Group PLLC, Was

567 F.Supp.2d 62 (2008) Vijayakumar MOSES, Plaintiff, v. HOWARD UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL, Defendant. Civil Action No. 01-2528 (PLF). United States District Court, District of Columbia. July 1, 2008. *63 Vijayakumar Moses, Riverdale, MD, pro se. Heidi L. Gunst, Mary A. House, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, Washington, D

900 A.2d 166 (2006) Dennis O. BOBB, Petitioner, v. HOWARD UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL, Respondent. No. 05-AA-768. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Submitted May 25, 2006. Decided June 8, 2006. *167 Dennis O. Bobb filed a brief pro se. Leroy T. Jenkins was on the brief for appellee. Before GLICKMAN and

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER FACCIOLA, United States Magistrate Judge. Initially, by my order of April 11, 2001, I refused to relieve plaintiff of her obligation to pay witness fees to the persons she sought to depose. Memorandum Order of April 11, 2001. She has asked me to reconsider that determination. I will do so now. The controlling statute, 28 U.S.C.A. § 1821(b)(1994), indicates tha

127 F.Supp.2d 27 (2000) Frank SUMMERS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. HOWARD UNIVERSITY, Defendant. No. CIV. A. 98-2692 SSH. United States District Court, District of Columbia. December 22, 2000. *28 John Fitzgerald Kennedy, Kennedy & Dolan, Silver Spring, MD, for Plaintiffs. Leroy T. Jenkins, Jr., Howard University, Office of

941 F.Supp. 206 (1996) Dr. Ann Knight RANDALL, Plaintiff, v. HOWARD UNIVERSITY, Defendant. Civ. A. No. 96-1293 (CRR). United States District Court, District of Columbia. October 21, 1996. *207 *208 Ann Knight Randall, Brooklyn, NY, pro se. Leroy T. Jenkins, Jr., Senior Associate General

Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS Nos. 19-CV-1250 & 20-CV-0122 DEON D. COLVIN, APPELLANT, V. HOWARD UNIVERSI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Vanessa Holloway, ) ) Pl ' t'ff, am ‘ § case; 1 ;17-cv-00013 V ) Assign'ed To : Unassigned ` ) Assign. Date: 1/4/2017 Howard University et al_, ) Description: Pro Se Gen. Civi| (F Deck) ) Defendants. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, has submitted a complaint and an application to proceed in forma pauperis The application Will be granted, and the complaint Will be dismissed. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) (requ

MEMORANDUM OPINION SETTING FORTH FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW BERYL A. HOWELL, Chief Judge The plaintiff Howard Town Center Developer, LLC, (the “Developer”) instituted this lawsuit against the defendant, Howard University (the “University”), over four years ago, on July 15, 2013. The parties’ dispute, over which this Court possesses diversity j

MEMORANDUM OPINION JAMES E. BOASBERG, United States District Judge Plaintiff Tyrone Pitts worked at Howard • University for fifteen years in a variety of finance-related roles. In suing Howard, he alleges that it discriminated against him based on his race (black) and created a hostile work environment. He also contends that, after he raised conce

Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS No. 21-PR-0900 IN RE ESTATE OF ROSETTA JENKINS; EDWARD JENKINS, APPELLANT. Appeal from

692 F.Supp.2d 65 (2010) Samuel H. MWABIRA-SIMERA, Plaintiff, v. HOWARD UNIVERSITY et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 05-441 (RWR). United States District Court, District of Columbia. March 10, 2010. *67 Samuel H. Mwabira-Simera, Washington, DC, pro se. Daniel I. Prywes, Stacey Terry Ormsby, William Edward Olson, Bryan Ca

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA SAMUEL H. MWABIRA-SIMERA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 05-441 (RWR) ) HOWARD UNIVERSITY et al., )

Filed 9/1/23 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THE PEOPLE, D081246 Plaintiff and Respondent, v. (Super. Ct. No. SCE202417) RHONDA LYNN JENKINS, Defendant and Appellant. APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of San Dieg

Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to Illinois Official Reports the accuracy and