Cases

APPEL, Justice (concurring specially). For the reasons expressed below, I conclude the judgment of the district court must be vacated to allow for an in camera inspection of Jherica Richardson’s mental health records under Iowa Code section 622.10(4) (Supp.2011). I write separately, however, to express my views on the important issues raised in this case and in the companion case of State v. Thompson, <

Opinion IRION, J. In this appeal from an order denying a motion for an award of attorney fees, we must decide whether a defendant who defeats a claim for breach of contract but loses a related claim for promissory estoppel is entitled to recover attorney fees when the alleged contract provides the prevailing party in any dispute between the parties shall recover such fees. We hold such a defendant is entitled t

ORTRIE D. SMITH, SENIOR JUDGE *989Pending are Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. #26), Plaintiff's Motion to Stay (Doc. #28), and Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. #35). For the following reasons, Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment is denied, Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment is granted, and Plaintiff's Motion

NOTICE: The attorneys on the attached list have the opportunity to comply with outstanding requirements prior to the effective date of the Supreme Court Order and not be administratively suspended. DATE: 11/14/2023 PENNSYLVANIA CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION PAGE: 1 TIME: 14:.42:19 NON- COMPLIANT LAWYERS USER ID: jilgenfr

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX 26-JUL-2024 02:27 PM Dkt. 32 ODAC SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAII

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA January 2020 Term _______________ FILED No. 18-1034 June 15, 2020 released at 3:00 p.m. _______________ EDYTHE NASH G

*180 RULING ON MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT ALVIN W. THOMPSON, District Judge. The Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) brings this action pursuant to §§ 21(d) and 21(e) of the Exchange Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 78u(d) and (e), against Joseph F. Apuzzo (“Apuzzo”), the former chief financial officer of Terex Corporation (“Terex”), a

Pfeifer, J., dissenting. {¶ 44} I dissent. This case calls for an application, not an extension, of United States v. Spearin (1918), 248 U.S. 132, 39 S.Ct. 59, 63 L.Ed. 166. As in all Spearin Doctrine cases, the fault in this case lies with the owner’s plans. It requires no leap to find that the state implicitly warranted that its plans were buildable and that that warranty prevailed over gener

851 F.Supp. 639 (1994) UNITED STATES of America v. ATLAS MINERALS AND CHEMICALS, INC., et al. v. R. Emory MABRY, et al. Civ. A. No. 91-5118. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. March 1, 1994. *640 *641 *642

JAMES O. BROWNING, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE *1043THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Plaintiffs' Opening Merits Brief, filed April 28, 2017 (Doc. 112)("Diné Brief"). The primary issues are: (i) whether the Plaintiffs have standing to pursue their claims under the National Environmental Policy Act,

ORDER TIMOTHY C. BATTEN, SR., District Judge. This case comes before the Court on Defendant Yamaha Motor Manufacturing Corporation’s (“YMMC”) motion for leave to file a motion to determine the substantive law of this case [69]. I. Motion for Leave to File This is a products-liability action over which the Court has diversity jurisdiction pursuant to

Re Document Nos.: 3, 24, 25, 26 29, 32 MEMORANDUM OPINION Granting Plaintiff’s Motion for an Injunction; Granting Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment; and Disposing of all Other Pending Motions in this Case RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION Orp

ORDER TIMOTHY C. BATTEN, SR., District Judge. This case comes before the Court on Defendant Yamaha Motor Co., Ltd.’s (“YMC”) motion to dismiss pursuant to *1321Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2) [54], I. Background This is a products-liability action. Plaintiffs Peter and Maureen McCarthy

643 F.Supp.2d 1107 (2009) In re UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INCORPORATED PSLRA LITIGATION. No. 06-CV-1691 (JMR/FLN). United States District Court, D. Minnesota. September 4, 2009. Carolyn G. Anderson, Zimmerman Reed, PLLP, Robert C. Moilanen, Anthony Ostlund Baer & Louwagie P.A., Minneapolis, MN, Donald J. Enright, Michael G. McLellan, Finkelstein Thompson & Loughran, Washin

If this opinion indicates that it is “FOR PUBLICATION,” it is subject to revision until final publication in the Michigan Appeals Reports. STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS DAVID KRIEGER, ANDREW KRIEGER, JAMES FOR PUBLICATION SPERLING, and MARGARET SPERLING, on September 7, 2023 Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly 9:05 a.m. Si

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-12-0001024 28-JUL-2015 11:11 AM SCWC-12-0001024 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI HOVEY B. LAMBERT, TRUSTEE UNDER THAT HOVEY B. LAMBERT TRUST, an

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-12-0001024 10-JUN-2015 07:50 AM SCWC-12-0001024 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI HOVEY B. LAMBERT, TRUSTEE UNDER THAT HOVEY B. LAMBERT TRUST, an

41 So.3d 997 (2010) Marianne Magill ACUNA & Marilyn Magill, Appellants, v. Jack DRESNER, et al., Appellees. Nos. 3D09-2031, 3D09-2982. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. August 4, 2010. Pepe & Nemire and Thomas F. Pepe, Coral Gables, for appellants. Tew Cardenas and Jeffrey Tew and Andrew B. Thomson, Miami, for appellee Jack Dresner;

Dismiss and Opinion Filed June 27, 2013. In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-12-01140-CV DOUBLE DIAMOND-DELAWARE, INC., DOUBLE DIAMOND, INC., WHITE BLUFF CLUB CORP., NATIONAL RESORT MANAGEMENT CO., R. MICHAEL WARD, FRED CURRAN, GEORGE COLLINS, LARRY

DISMISS; and Opinion Filed October 7, 2013. Court of Appeals S In The Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-13-00893-CV DOUBLE DIAMOND DELAWARE, INC., DOUBLE DIAMOND, INC., WHITE BLUFF CLUB CORP., NATIONAL RESORT MANAGEMENT CO., R. MICHAEL WARD, FRED CURRAN, GEORGE COLLINS, LAR