Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “JD v. Crown Point School Corporation”
Rodgers v. Gary Community School Corp.public domain
OPINION AND ORDER JON E. DEGUILIO, Judge, United States District Court This matter is before the Court on the: (1) “Motion for Summary Judgment,” filed by Defendant, Gary Community School Corporation, on July 30, 2015 [DE 29]; and (2) “Objection and Motion to Strike Plaintiff S.J. Exhibit A & Plaintiffs S.J. Exhibit B,” filed by Defendant, Gary Community School Corporation, on September 16, 2015 [DE 3
ACCEPTED 03-14-00644-CV 4422882 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
In the Missourt Court of Appeals Eastern District SPECIAL DIVISION SHANNON DUGAN, ) No. ED111485 ) Respondent, ) Appeal from the Circuit Court of ) the City of St. Louis vs. ) 1822-CC00663 ) HYATT CORPORATION D/B/A ) Honorable Timothy J. Boyer HYATT REGENCY ST. LOUIS AT THE )} ARCH, ) ) Appellant. ) Filed: December 3, 2024 Before Thomas C. Clark, II, C.J., James M. Dowd, J., and Renée Hardin-Tammons, J. Introduction On April 19, 2016, at the Hyatt Regency hotel in downtown St. Louis, Hyatt s
the Port of Houston Authority of Harris County, Texas v. Zachry Construction Corporationpublic domain
ACCEPTED 14-10-00708-CV FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 6/12/2015 5:04:25 PM
Brueck v. John Maneely Co.public domain
OPINION AND ORDER JON E. DEGUILIO, District Judge. This action arises out of the defendant’s retraction of a job offer to the plaintiff. Plaintiff Kelly L. Brueck had already accepted an offer of employment with Defendant JMC Steel Group, Inc. and quit her existing job when JMC Steel retracted its offer, citing a background check that revealed falsehoods in Ms. Brueck’s job application. Ms. Brueck
J.M. v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)public domain
MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be FILED regarded as precedent or cited before any Oct 30 2020, 8:11 am court except for the purpose of establishing CLERK the defense of res judicata, collateral Indiana Supreme Court
Reiner v. Dandurandpublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER PAUL R. CHERRY, United States Magistrate Judge. This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ F.R.C.P. 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss [DE 6], filed on October 18, 2013. I. Procedural Background On August 29, 2013, Plaintiffs James E. Reiner and Dana Reiner filed an eleven-count Complaint against Defendants Anthony Dandurand, Travis Thomas, and th
Wilkinson v. People of the VIpublic domain
For Publication IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS LLOYD S. WILKINSON ) S.Ct. Crim. No. 2017-0018 Appellant/Defendant ) Re: Super. Ct. Crim. No. 062/2015 (STT) ) v ) ) PEOPLE OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS )
Faiella v. FNMApublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Ralph Faiella v. Civil No. 16-cv-088-JD Opinion No. 2017 DNH 250 Federal National Mortgage Association O R D E R Ralph Faiella brought a plea of title action in state court against Federal National Mortgage Association (“Fannie Mae”) and Green Tree Servicing LLC, now known as Ditec
Williams v. Central Vermont Med. Ctr., Inc.public domain
Williams v. Central Vermont Med. Ctr., Inc., No. 206-4-14 Wncv (Tomasi, J., June 10, 2016). [The text of this Vermont trial court opinion is unofficial. It has been reformatted from the original. The accuracy of the text and the accompanying data included in the Vermont trial court opinion database is not guaranteed.] VERMONT SUPERIOR COURT SUPERIOR COURT CIVIL DIVISION Wa
Viamedia, Inc. v. Comcast Corp.public domain
AMY J. ST. EVE, United States Circuit Court Judge* This antitrust suit was born when a monopolist in one market decided not to do business with a competitor from a related market. The monopolist, Comcast Corporation, denied its competitor, Viamedia, Inc., access (or access on terms Viamedia considered reasonable) to much-needed sales platforms called interconnects. Hurting as it lost revenue and customer
State v. LG Elecs., Inc.public domain
, FILE"'. IN CLERKS OFFICE IUI'REME COUR'f, STAlE OF WASIIIIIIrnlll DATE JUL 1 4 2016 ·m~'n<j. Supreme Court Cieri< IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, ) ) Respondent, ) No. 91263-7 ) v.
Perez-Crisantos v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co.public domain
This opinion was filed for record ;£:QQ Ocro onfih 2)'Dlj at ~~ SUSAN L. CARLSON SUPREME COURT CLERK IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON ISIDORO PEREZ-CRISANTOS, ) a single man, )
Perez-Crisantos v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co.public domain
NOTICE: SLIP OPINION (not the court’s final written decision) The opinion that begins on the next page is a slip opinion. Slip opinions are the written opinions that are originally filed by the court. A slip opinion is not necessarily the court’s final written decision. Slip opinions can be changed by subsequent court orders. For example, a court may issue an order making substantive changes to a slip opinion or publishing for precedential pur
Jesep v. NE Health Care Quality Foundpublic domain
Jesep v. NE Health Care Quality Found 04-CV-77-JD 04/27/05 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Peter Paul Jesep v. Civil No. 04-cv-77-JD Opinion No. 2005 DNH 073 Northeast Health Care Quality Foundation and Robert Aurilio O R D E R Peter Paul Jesep brought claims under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and New H
State v. S.J.C.public domain
This opinion was flied for record at 6:ooAyn on>lt.wtt( tL6aQlS IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON ) STATE OF WASHINGTON, ) ) No. 90355-7 Appellant, ) )
BONVILLAIN v. Louisiana Land & Exploration Co.public domain
702 F.Supp.2d 667 (2010) Gene P. BONVILLAIN, in his capacity as Assessor for the Parish of Terrebonne, State of Louisiana v. LOUISIANA LAND & EXPLORATION CO., et al. Civil Action Nos. 09-3540, 09-3541, 09-5781, 09-5782, 09-5783, 09-5784, 09-5787, 09-5789, 09-5790, 09-5793, 09-5795, 09-5802, 09-5803. United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana. March 29, 2010. <
Antolik v. Saks Inc.public domain
407 F.Supp.2d 1064 (2006) Michelle ANTOLIK, Sara Biris, Marleen Dixon, Anne Golke, Carol Jones, Jennifer Ladehoff, Susan McClellan, Darlene Owens, Linh Phantahavong, Susan Robeoltman, Dena Steinbach, Julie Vogeler, Connie Ward, Tosha Whitson, Cheryl Womack, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. SAKS INCORPORATED, d/b/a Younkers, Defendant. No. 4:03 CV 90203. United S
DBMP LLC v. Delaware Claims Processing Facility, LLCpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE DBMP LLC; JOHNSON & JOHNSON; ) PECOS RIVER TALC, LLC; RED RIVER ) TALC, LLC; J-M MANUFACTURING CO., ) INC.; THE DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY; ) ROHM AND HAAS COMPANY; and UNION ) CARBIDE CORPORATION, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v.
State of Texas v. Harris County, Texaspublic domain
ACCEPTED 15-24-00120-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 1/14/2025 6:14 PM No. 15-24-00120-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE