⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “JASON STEELE”

Steele v. Goodmanpublic domain
District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2019-03-31 · Published · cited 11× · 382 F. Supp. 3d 403
M. Hannah Lauck, United States District Judge This matter comes before the Court on five motions: (1) Defendant Patricia A. Negron's Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim ("Negron's Motion to Dismiss"),1 (ECF No. 47); (2) Defendant Jason Goodman's "Special Motion to Dismiss the Complaint Under the VA Anti-Slapp Statute" ("Goodman's Motion to Dismiss"),2 (ECF No. 45
State v. Steelepublic domain
Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2019-03-08 · Published · cited 0× · 435 P.3d 1181
Affirmed.
District Court, N.D. Texas · 2015-01-12 · Published · cited 0× · 82 F. Supp. 3d 699; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3850; 2015 WL 170411
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER JOHN McBRYDE, District Judge. Before the court for consideration and decision is the motion of plaintiff, Larry D. Steele, to remand the above-captioned action to the state court from which it was removed on the ground that the court lacks subject matter jurisdiction. After having considered such motion and its supporting brief and appendix, the response of defe
Elias v. Steelepublic domain
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002-10-02 · Published · cited 0× · 831 So. 2d 211; 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 14231; 2002 WL 31174905
PER CURIAM. Samir Geryes Elias appeals from an injunction prohibiting any contact with Dr. Lisa Steele. At the time of the events which formed the predicate for the injunction, Dr. Steele was a pathologist at the Miami-Dade County Medical Examiner’s Office. The appellant’s father had died as a result of advanced cancer of the bladder which had spread to other regions and portions of his body. Dr. Steele performed the autopsy
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007-01-11 · Published · cited 0× · 946 So. 2d 122; 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 244; 2007 WL 63371
PER CURIAM. DISMISSED. Mintz v. Broward Corr. Inst., 800 So.2d 343 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001). BROWNING, C.J., WOLF, and KAHN, JJ., concur.
District Court, D. Minnesota · 2003-01-02 · Published · cited 0× · 242 F. Supp. 2d 624; 31 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1381; 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1537; 2003 WL 215381
242 F.Supp.2d 624 (2003) Adam STEELE et al. v. CITY OF BEMIDJI et al. No. 99-CV-1862(JMR/RLE). United States District Court, D. Minnesota. January 2, 2003. *625 Adam Steele, Bemidji, MN, pro se. Jon K. Iverson, Paul D. Reuvers, Jason J. Kuboushek, Iverson Reuvers, Bloomington, MN, for defendant. ORDER
Ohio Supreme Court · 2004-09-23 · Published · cited 129× · 103 Ohio St. 3d 355; 815 N.E.2d 1107
Per Curiam. {¶ 1} Relators, Steve Steele, Mark Gray, and Joseph Minney, are electors of the city of Chillicothe, Ohio, who are members of a committee filing a petition proposing an ordinance establishing minimum staffing levels in the Chillicothe Fire Department. On July 20, 2004, relators filed a precirculation copy of the initiative petition with respondent Chillicothe Auditor William D. Morrissey. The petition was present
District Court, D. Maryland · 2006-10-03 · Published · cited 6× · 237 F.R.D. 561; 2006 WL 2833182
MEMORANDUM OPINION GRIMM, United States Magistrate Judge. This case has been referred to me to preside over garnishment proceedings, Paper No. 60, which arise from the efforts of Data-Quick Information Systems, Inc. (“Data-Quick”) to collect on a judgment issued in its favor against Steele Software Systems Corp. (“Steele Software”) and its successor corporation, Three S Delaware, Inc. (“Three S”).
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2024-01-18 · Published · cited 0×
01/18/2024 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs January 3, 2023 JASON BRITT v. RICHARD JASON USERY ET AL. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Henderson County No. 17112-2 Judge Donald H. Allen ___________________________________
Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2024-09-17 · Published · cited 0×
FOURTH DIVISION DILLARD, P. J., BROWN and PADGETT, JJ. NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. https://www.gaappeals.us/rules September 17, 2024
Taylor v. Steelepublic domain
District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2019-03-31 · Published · cited 0× · 372 F. Supp. 3d 800
RODNEY W. SIPPEL, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This matter is before me upon the petition of Missouri state prisoner Leonard Taylor for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (Doc. 19). After carefully considering Taylor's petition, Respondent's brief (Doc. 29), the underlying record (Doc. 29, Ex. A-
State v. Steelepublic domain
Connecticut Appellate Court · 2017-08-29 · Published · cited 10× · 169 A.3d 797; 176 Conn. App. 1; 2017 WL 3700789; 2017 Conn. App. LEXIS 350
ALVORD, J. The defendant, Thomas Steele, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of robbery in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-134 (a) (4), conspiracy to commit robbery in the first degree in violation of General Statutes §§ 53a-48 (a) and 53a-134 (a) (4), and conspiracy to commit larceny in the third degree in violation of General S
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2025-06-12 · Published · cited 0×
STATE OF LOUISIANA * NO. 2024-KA-0452 VERSUS * COURT OF APPEAL TYRONE STEELE * FOURTH CIRCUIT * STATE OF LOUISIANA ******* APPEAL FROM CRIMI
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1993-04-20 · Published · cited 2× · 500 N.W.2d 384; 176 Wis. 2d 400; 1993 Wisc. App. LEXIS 458
176 Wis.2d 400 (1993) 500 N.W.2d 384 IN the INTEREST OF JASON B., a Child Under the Age of Eighteen Years: JASON B., Appellant,[†] v. STATE of Wisconsin, Respondent. No. 92-2634-FT. Court of Appeals of Wisconsin. Submitted on briefs February 16, 1993. Decided April 20, 1993. *402</
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025-01-15 · Published · cited 5× · 125 F.4th 1230
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JASON WOLFORD; ALISON No. 23-16164 WOLFORD; ATOM KASPRZYCKI; HAWAII FIREARMS COALITION, D.C. No. 1:23-cv-00265- Plaintiffs-Appellees, LEK-WRP v. ORDER ANNE E. LOPEZ, in her official capacity as the Attorney General of the State of Hawaii,
Texas Supreme Court · 2020-06-12 · Published · cited 0×
FILED 18-0159 6/12/2020 3:13 PM tex-43709833 SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2025-08-06 · Published · cited 0×
USCA4 Appeal: 22-6189 Doc: 58 Filed: 08/06/2025 Pg: 1 of 43 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 22-6189 JASON TYANN BELL, Petitioner – Appellant, v. J.C. STREEVAL, Warden of USP Lee, R
Court of Appeals of Texas · 2018-01-11 · Published · cited 13× · 549 S.W.3d 768
Bob Pemberton, Justice This appeal requires us to ascertain the nature and parameters of "derivative" sovereign immunity for government contractors as recognized under current Texas law-a matter going to the trial court's jurisdiction to adjudicate a lawsuit and not necessarily the merits of the lawsuit itself. Our conclusions and their application to the record in this case require us to affirm in part and reverse in part.
Heddings v. Steelepublic domain
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987-05-29 · Published · cited 39× · 526 A.2d 349; 514 Pa. 569; 1987 Pa. LEXIS 700
opinion of the court HUTCHINSON, Justice. Appellants, John and Edith Steele, appeal by allowance a Superior Court order which affirmed the Court of Common *571Pleas of Lycoming County. Appellants claim that the trial judge abused his discretion by allowing hearsay testimony into evidence in a custody matter pursuant to a previously unrecognized sta
Heddings v. Steelepublic domain
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985-08-02 · Published · cited 3× · 496 A.2d 1166; 344 Pa. Super. 399; 1985 Pa. Super. LEXIS 8195
WICKERSHAM, Judge: John and Edith Steele appeal from the orders of the Court of Common Pleas of Lycoming County denying them primary custody of their grandchildren, Heidi and Jason Gatz, presently ages ten and five, respectively. Once again, this court is called upon to assume the unenviable role of King Solomon and render judgment as to the proper custodians of two small children. We must choose from among