Cases

SYLLABUS This syllabus is not part of the Court’s opinion. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Court and may not summarize all portions of the opinion. Alejandra Padilla v. Young Il An (A-43-22) (087862) Argued November 8, 2023 -- Decided June 13, 2024 PIERRE-LOUIS, J., writing for the Court. In this appeal, the Court considers whether o

785 So.2d 1041 (2001) Ednay Mae GRANT, Janie Brezine Myles, Thelonious Dilbert Grant, Diedre Heloise Grant and Satandra Grant Babineaux v. BOH BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., Buddy Thomas, Jr., Charles A. Favalora, and their Insurers. No. 2000-CA-1227. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit. April 25, 2001. *1042 Mack

STATE OF LOUISIANA * NO. 2020-KA-0450 VERSUS * COURT OF APPEAL KENDALL BARNES * DERRICK GROVES FOURTH CIRCUIT * STATE OF LOUISIANA ******* APPEAL FROM C

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER SUSAN RICHARD NELSON, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s Partial Motion to Dismiss Counts Two Through Seven [Doc. No. 16]. For the reasons set forth herein, Defendant’s Motion is granted, and portions of Counts Two through Five are dismissed, and Counts Six and Seven are dismissed in their entirety. I. BACKGROUND

Opinion of the Court COX, Judge: Despite his pleas, a general court-martial convicted- the accused of larceny of $1,000.00 from the Zaragoza Officers’ Open Mess (Officers’ Club), in violation of Article 121, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 921. The approved sentence extends to a bad-conduct discharge, confinement at hard labor for 8 months and reduction to the grade of E-3. The Co

DISCOVERY ORDER PAUL TREVOR SHARP, United States Magistrate. This matter is before the Court for a ruling on the motion of defendant Purcell Company, Inc. (Purcell) for a protective order, filed October 9, 1984. Counsel appeared at a hearing on the motion on December 14, 1984, at the United States Courthouse in Greensboro. *643Pu

ANDERSON, Judge: This is a takings and inverse condemnation case. Sea Cabins on the Ocean IV Homeowners’ Association, Inc. and numerous owners of units in the homeowners’ association (Sea Cabins) filed this action against the City of North Myrtle Beach alleging a taking and condemnation of their private pier. The Master-in-Equity found a taking had occurred and awarded Sea Cabins $900,000.00 in compensation. The City appeals.

BURNETT, Justice: Petitioners Sea Cabins on the Ocean TV Homeowners Association, Inc., et al., (Sea Cabins) brought this inverse condemnation action against Respondent City of North Myrtle Beach (City) alleging certain “affirmative and aggressive actions” by City constituted an unconstitutional temporary taking of their private pier for public use without compensation in violation of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Co

ACCEPTED 03-15-00348-CV 6616789 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS