⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “JAMES MICHAEL COX”

Indiana Court of Appeals · 2017-03-20 · Published · cited 0×
MEMORANDUM DECISION FILED Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), Mar 20 2017, 8:52 am this Memorandum Decision shall not be CLERK regarded as precedent or cited before any Indiana Supreme Court
People v. Coxpublic domain
Supreme Court of Colorado · 2017-02-06 · Published · cited 178× · 401 P.3d 509; 2017 CO 8
JUSTICE HOOD, dissenting. ¶24 In People v. Zuniga, 2016 CO 52, 372 P.3d 1052, I dissented based on my belief that the circumstances there, including Lobo’s alert, fell short of establishing probable cause to search Zuniga’s car. I respectfully dissent here, too, because I believe these circumstances fall even shorter. ¶25 The majority correctly states the Fourth Amendment’s warrant requirem
Cox v. Statepublic domain
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012-10-19 · Published · cited 0× · 99 So. 3d 609; 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 18253; 2012 WL 5036416
COHEN, J. William Cox challenges the trial court’s refusal to award credit for jail time served prior to a violation of probation. We reverse. Cox was originally charged with a home invasion robbery. After entering a plea, he was sentenced to 364 days’ incarceration followed by five years’ probation.1 Not long after his release from jail, he violated probation. Following an ad
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994-06-13 · Published · cited 0× · 25 F.3d 1042; 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 20893; 1994 WL 251189
25 F.3d 1042NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. James R. VAUGHTER, Plaintiff Appellant,v.Michael W. COX, Defendant Appellee. No. 93-7074. United States Court of Appeals
District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016-04-18 · Published · cited 16× · 180 F. Supp. 3d 556; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 51387; 2016 WL 1555718
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Virginia M. Kendall, United States District Court Judge Northern District of Illinois Plaintiff Lawrence Cox filed this five-count complaint against Calumet Public Schools District 132.and the School District’s Superintendent, Elizabeth Reynolds, for sex discrimination and retaliation in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act-of 1964 (42 U.S.C. § 2000e, et- seq.); viol
United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 2004-10-19 · Published · cited 14× · 315 B.R. 850; 65 Fed. R. Serv. 713; 52 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 1719; 2004 Bankr. LEXIS 1583; 2004 WL 2339497
315 B.R. 850 (2004) In re Donnie R. COX and Michelle M. Cox, Debtors. Donnie R. Cox and Michelle M. Cox, Debtors—Appellants, v. Habbo G. Fokkena, U.S. Trustee—Appellee. No. 04-6016SI. United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Eighth Circuit. Submitted August 26, 2004. Filed October 19, 2004. *852 Michae
Cox v. Statepublic domain
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2006-12-29 · Published · cited 52× · 2006 OK CR 51; 152 P.3d 244; 2006 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 53; 2006 WL 3861070
152 P.3d 244 (2006) 2006 OK CR 51 Kenneth James COX, Petitioner v. STATE of Oklahoma, Respondent. No. C-2005-675. Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma. December 29, 2006. *246 Greg Camp, attorney at law, Enid, OK, attorney for defendant at trial. Stephanie Hampton, Bryan Slabotsky, Michael Fields,
District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2013-08-08 · Published · cited 0× · 295 F.R.D. 207; 2013 WL 4051032; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 111762
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TANYA WALTON PRATT, District Judge. The Magistrate Judge submitted his Report and Recommendation on Plaintiffs Motion for Class Certification. The parties were afforded due opportunity pursuant to statute and the rules of this Court to file objections; none were filed. The Court, having considered the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, hereby adopts the Mag
Thornhill v. Coxpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004-10-14 · Published · cited 9× · 113 F. App'x 179
ORDER In this pro se action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, former Illinois inmate Michael T. Thornhill claims that a number of past and current prison employees at Logan Correctional Center denied him adequate medical care and housing during a brief period in December 1999, and that several defendants were motivated by a desire to retaliate for grievances and a lawsuit that he filed at the start of the episode. The district court di
District Court, N.D. Texas · 2010-11-24 · Published · cited 11× · 726 F. Supp. 2d 659; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 124605; 2010 WL 4781304
726 F.Supp.2d 659 (2010) Michael COX, Plaintiff, v. HILCO RECEIVABLES, L.L.C., and Central Credit Services, Inc., Defendants. No. 3:09-CV-897-M. United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division. November 24, 2010. *661 Bonner Walsh, James H. Owen, Jeffrey L. Weinstein, Jeffrey L. Weinstein P.C., Athens, TX, for Plaintiff
People v. Coxpublic domain
Appellate Court of Illinois · 2007-11-21 · Published · cited 22× · 879 N.E.2d 459; 377 Ill. App. 3d 690; 316 Ill. Dec. 392; 2007 Ill. App. LEXIS 1210
879 N.E.2d 459 (2007) The PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Quentin COX, Defendant-Appellant. No. 1-05-3436. Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, Fourth Division. November 21, 2007. Rehearing Denied December 20, 2007. *463 Michael J. Pelletier, Deputy Defender, Ann B. McLennan, Assis
District Court, S.D. California · 2013-04-29 · Published · cited 2× · 291 F.R.D. 473; 2013 WL 1797028; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 60941
ORDER: 1. Certifying a Class and Subclass for Purposes of Settlement; 2. Granting Final Approval of the Proposed Settlement; 3. Approving the Requested Award of Attorneys’ Fees and Costs; and 4. Approving the Requested Incentive Awards for Plaintiffs Cox, Hall, and Lynch. MARILYN L. HUFF, District Judge. On Nov
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015-07-22 · Published · cited 41× · 794 F.3d 1259; 2015 WL 4461615
HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judge: This litigation has a long history in the Eleventh Circuit. In, this latest chapter Cox Enterprises and Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC) do battle for what remains of the now-defunct newspaper publisher News-Journal Corporation (NJC). This case arises at the intersection of Florida’s election-to-purchase statute
District Court, D. Delaware · 2017-11-09 · Published · cited 0× · 302 F. Supp. 3d 597
BATAILLON, Senior District Judge I. INTRODUCTION In this patent case involving Plaintiff Sprint Communications Company, L.P. ("Plaintiff" or "Sprint") against Defendant *602Cox Communications, Inc. ("Defendant" or "Cox"), Sprint alleges that Cox infringes certain of Sprint's telecommunications and data networki
James v. Yarbroughpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007-05-21 · Published · cited 0× · 232 F. App'x 714
MEMORANDUM ** Charles C. James (“James”) appeals the denial of his petition for habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. He argues that the California trial court violated his Sixth Amendment right to confrontation by allowing the transcript of the preliminary hearing testimony of a key witness—Yolanda Smith—to be read into the record because she was “unavailable” for live questioning. We have jurisdiction purs
Coffey v. Coxpublic domain
District Court, C.D. Illinois · 2002-12-06 · Published · cited 0× · 234 F. Supp. 2d 884; 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24063; 2002 WL 31803365
234 F.Supp.2d 884 (2002) Charles G. COFFEY, Plaintiff, v. James C. COX, Joseph Galassi, James Simmons, and Michael Stang, Defendants. No. 01-3077. United States District Court, C.D. Illinois, Springfield Division. December 6, 2002. *885 *886 Mary Lee Leahy, Leahy Law Offices, Springfield, IL,
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2016-03-17 · Published · cited 331× · 817 F.3d 123; 2016 WL 1056091; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 4877
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-7746 JAMES HERMAN RAYNOR, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. G. PUGH, Housing Unit #1 Manager, Defendant - Appellee, and HAROLD W. CLARK, Director of Department of Corrections; MARIE VARGO, Ms., Defendants. Appeal from the United St
Coffey v. Coxpublic domain
District Court, C.D. Illinois · 2002-08-20 · Published · cited 2× · 218 F. Supp. 2d 997; 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15284; 2002 WL 1902608
218 F.Supp.2d 997 (2002) Charles G. COFFEY, Plaintiff, v. James C. COX, Joseph Galassi, James Simmons, and Michael Stang, Defendants. No. 01-3077. United States District Court, C.D. Illinois, Springfield Division. August 20, 2002. *998 Mary Lee Leahy Leahy, Law Offices, Springfield, IL, for Plaintiff. Jeffrey D. Colman, Da
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015-03-20 · Published · cited 9× · 781 F.3d 396
MELLOY, Circuit Judge. In September 2011, the Department of Labor (DOL) began investigating a complaint that ActionLink, LLC, a marketing company, had misclassified some of its em *399 ployees as exempt under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) and failed to pay overtime compensation. During the sub
Cox v. Russellpublic domain
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2004-02-23 · Published · cited 0× · 367 N.J. Super. 121; 842 A.2d 243; 2004 N.J. Super. LEXIS 82
The opinion of the court was delivered by LINTNER, J.A.D. Daniel Cox appeals from two Law Division orders for summary judgment. The first, entered on May 29, 2002, dismissed Cox’s personal injury complaint against his grandfather Daniel Garcia, the owner of the vehicle that struck Cox. The second, entered on April 14, 2003, in favor of New Jersey Manufacturers Insurance Company (NJM), found that Garcia’s veh