Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “JAMES CARL WILCOX”
Northern California River Watch v. Wilcoxpublic domain
ORDER The unopposed motion of the United States, as amicus curiae, to clarify the court’s Opinion is granted as follows: The Opinion, filed on August 25, 2010, and reported at 620 F.3d 1075 (9th Cir.2010), is amended as follows: At Slip Op. 12801, [620 F.3d at 1089-90], the first full paragraph beginning with and ending with is del
Northern California River Watch v. Wilcoxpublic domain
620 F.3d 1075 (2010) NORTHERN CALIFORNIA RIVER WATCH, a non-profit corporation; Robert G. Evans, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Carl WILCOX; Gene Cooley; Robert Floerke; William R. Schellinger; Frank H. Schellinger, individually and doing business as Schellinger Brothers; Scott Schellinger, Defendants-Appellees. No. 08-15780. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and
State v. James P.public domain
281 Wis.2d 685 (2005) 2005 WI 80 698 N.W.2d 95 IN RE the TERMINATION OF PARENTAL RIGHTS TO CHEZRON M., a Person Under the Age of 18: STATE of Wisconsin, Petitioner-Respondent, v. JAMES P., Respondent-Appellant-Petitioner. No. 2004AP723. Supreme Court of Wisconsin. Oral argument March 2, 2005. Decided June 17,
Carl J. Battaglia, M.D., P.A. v. Alexanderpublic domain
177 S.W.3d 893 (2005) CARL J. BATTAGLIA, M.D., P.A., and Tommy A. Polk, M.D., P.A., Petitioners, v. Lisa Jones ALEXANDER, Individually and as Natural Representative of the Estate of Mark G. Alexander, Deceased, James Alexander, Individually, and Ruby Alexander, Individually, Respondents. No. 02-0701. Supreme Court of Texas. Argued October 15, 2003. Decided May
Donald Parkell v. Carl Danbergpublic domain
OPINION CHAGARES, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff Donald Parkell is a Delaware state prisoner who claims that state officials deprived him of his rights under the Fourth, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendments by subjecting him to unreasonable thrice-daily visual body-cavity searches *320
Anderson v. Wilcoxpublic domain
189 N.W.2d 541 (1971) Carl Raymond ANDERSON and Mary Ann Anderson, Appellants, v. James WILCOX, Appellee. No. 54549. Supreme Court of Iowa. September 9, 1971. *542 Thoma, Schoenthal, Davis, Hockenberg & Wine, Des Moines, for appellants. Hopkins, Bump & Huebner, Des Moines, for appellee. BECKER, Justice.
Northern Cal. River Watch v. Wilcoxpublic domain
633 F.3d 766 (2010) NORTHERN CALIFORNIA RIVER WATCH, a non-profit corporation; Robert G. Evans, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Carl WILCOX; Gene Cooley; Robert Floerke; William R. Schellinger; Frank H. Schellinger, individually and doing business as Schellinger Brothers; Scott Schellinger, Defendants-Appellees. No. 08-15780. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and
Babcock & Wilcox Co. v. Marshallpublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT ADAMS, Circuit Judge. In Marshall v. Barlow’s, Inc., 436 U.S. 307, 98 S.Ct. 1816, 56 L.Ed.2d 305 (1978), the Supreme Court declared that the Fourth Amendment stands between an employer and the use of compliance inspections by the agency charged with enforcing the Occupational Safety and Health Act (the Act).1 From the time of that decision, num
House v. Jamespublic domain
Jordan, Justice. The appellants here, plaintiffs below, brought an action on October 31, 1973, in Bibb Superior Court seeking a temporary and permanent injunction against the appellees’ proposed use of a house at 2034 Vineville Avenue in the City of Macon as a law office contrary to a restrictive covenant limiting the use for residential purposes only, said restrictions being first recorded in a declaration by the Beverly Plac
William Garey v. James S. Farrin, P.C.public domain
USCA4 Appeal: 21-1478 Doc: 140 Filed: 06/03/2022 Pg: 1 of 23 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 21-1478 WILLIAM PARKER GAREY; AARON KENT CRUTHIS; JUSTIN BRENT BLAKESLEE; ADILAH HANEEFAH-KHADI MCNEIL; CHARLOTTE MOFFAT CLEVENGER; BELINDA LEE STEINMETZ, on behalf o
Schwab v. Timmonspublic domain
224 Wis.2d 27 (1999) 589 N.W.2d 1 James G. SCHWAB and Katherine Schwab, Plaintiffs-Co-Appellants-Petitioners, Dorice McCoRMICK, Plaintiff-Appellant-Petitioner, v. Helen TIMMONS, Carl D. Lenz Trust, Robert B. Bruce, Henry & Phyllis Pelletier, Robert W. Beart, Helen E. Beart, Robert W. Beart, Jr., Beth A. Drost, Stanford & Susan Sholem, Oscar C. & Patricia F. Boldt, John Zimdars, Jr., John C. Zimdars Jr. Trus
Sanders v. Kohler Co.public domain
641 F.3d 290 (2011) Leroy SANDERS; Stacy Ashcraft; Julee Pratt; Dorothy Bailey; John Banks; James Bennett; Jason Bottoms; Barbara Bottoms; Randal Brannum; Treva Brannum; Jack Bratton; Marlene Burks; Lisa Burton; William Chaney; Billy Chasteen; Sherry Chasteen; Kenneth Cooperwood; Garrett W. Davis; Lakesha Decker; David Degrandchamp; Debra Ann Dozier; Lenora Driver; Meshell Duffy; Randall Eligh; Marlena R. English; Martez Freeman; Randal Frolos; Twyla Gla
PER CURIAM. -In this diversity action the plaintiff, Carl C. Bain, was awarded a jury verdict on which judgment was entered for $100,000. The New York Central Railroad has appealed on the ground that Bain, as a trespasser, failed to prove actual knowledge of his presence and perilous position, by the crew of the train which caused his
People v. Desirpublic domain
People v Desir (2024 NY Slip Op 00641) People v Desir 2024 NY Slip Op 00641 Decided on February 7, 2024 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
Jackson v. Bensonpublic domain
*27PER CURIAM. ¶ 1. Respondents, Carl Gobel, Warner Jackson, Father Thomas Mueller, and Wendell Harris, and Attorney Ed Garvey and the law firm of Garvey, Stoddard, S.C. move the court for reconsideration of Part II of its opinion in Jackson v. Benson, 2002 WI 14, 249 Wis. 2d 681, 639 N.W.2d 545,1 finding the motion to vacate the court's
Alnutt v. Clearypublic domain
913 F.Supp. 160 (1996) Jeffrey ALNUTT, Plaintiff, v. William CLEARY, James Kenner, Keith White, Robert Gruver, Joseph Bates, Richard Koslowski, Thomas Lamb, Carl Anderson, Mary Guenther, Defendants. No. 90-CV-804L. United States District Court, W.D. New York. January 8, 1996. *161 *162
James v. Arms Technology, Inc.public domain
820 A.2d 27 (2003) 359 N.J. Super. 291 Mayor Sharpe JAMES and The City of Newark, New Jersey, Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. ARMS TECHNOLOGY, INCORPORATED; B.L. Jennings, Inc.; Beretta U.S.A.; Browning Arms Co.; Bryco Arms; Colt's Manufacturing Co.; Glock, Inc.; H & R; Heckler & Koch, Inc.; International Armament Corp. (d/b/a "Interarms Industries, Inc."); MKS Supply, Inc. (d/b/a "Hi-Point Firearms"); Phoenix Arms; Sig
228 Wis.2d 44 (1999) 596 N.W.2d 456 ANTWAUN A., a minor, by his Guardian ad Litem, Emmanuel L. Muwonge, Plaintiffs-Appellants, STATE of Wisconsin DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & SOCIAL SERVICES and Racine County Department of Human Services, Plaintiffs, v. HERITAGE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Respondent, Ernestine HONEYCUTT, Truck Insurance Company, Cigna Insurance Company, Commercial Union Insurance Company, an
Jackson v. Bensonpublic domain
249 Wis.2d 681 (2002) 2002 WI 14 639 N.W.2d 545 Warner JACKSON, Jennifer Evans, Wendell Harris, The Reverend Andrew Kennedy, Rabbi Isaac Serotta, Ceil Ann Libber, Father Thomas J. Mueller, Reverend John N. Gregg, Diane Brewer, Colleen Beaman, Mary Morris, Penny Morse, Kathleen Jones and Philip Jones, Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. John T. BENSON, Superintendent of Public Instruction, Department of Publi
Alnutt v. Clearypublic domain
27 F.Supp.2d 395 (1998) Jeffrey ALNUTT, Plaintiff, v. William CLEARY, James Kenner, Keith White, Robert Gruver, Joseph Bates, Richard Kozlowski, Thomas Lamb, Carl Anderson, Mary Guenther, Defendants. No. 90-CV-804L. United States District Court, W.D. New York. November 24, 1998. *396 *397 Marg