Cases

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 19-2075 Filed December 16, 2020 STATE OF IOWA, Plaintiff-Appellant, vs. MARK BERNARD RETTERATH, Defendant-Appellee. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Mitchell County, James M. Drew, Judge. The State appeals an order granting the defendant a new trial on his conviction for sol

POWERS, Justice. Appellee, Continental Constructors, Inc., sued, in Travis County, Texas, the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department and appellant Bernard Johnson, Inc. The suit arose out of appellee’s construction of a bulkhead at Lake Livingston, Texas under a contract between appellee and the Department. The contract called for construction of the bulkhead to plans and specifications prepared by appellant and contained other

GARWOOD, Circuit Judge: Defendant-appellant James Harvey “Jim” Brown (Brown), a prominent Louisiana political figure, is currently under indictment in the Middle District of Louisiana on various charges relating to the brokering of an alleged “sham” settlement of a threatened lawsuit by the State of Louisiana against the president of a failed automobile insurance company. The di

BARKSDALE, Circuit Judge: James C. Thomas appeals the summary judgment awarded N.A. Chase Manhattan Bank in his action for fraud, arising from Chase’s referral of an investment partner. Addressing only the standing issue for the present, we AFFIRM in part, REMAND for further findings, and defer ruling on the remaining issues pending remand.- I.

805 A.2d 514 (2002) COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellant v. Joseph P. KIRKNER, IV, Appellee, Kellie Kirkner, Intervenor. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Submitted April 2, 2002. Decided August 27, 2002. Nicholas J. Casenta, Anthony Sarcione, West Chester, for the Com., appellant James T. Marsh, Kenneth Square, for Joseph P. Kirkner, IV, appellee.

Both Sanders and Tanner were put to trial upon identical Complaints of the District Attorney in the Circuit Court of the Eighteenth Judicial Circuit, sitting without a jury, which read as follows: "DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S COMPLAINT "THE STATE OF ALABAMA, } THE CIRCUIT COURT OF "SHELBY COUNTY. } THE EIGHTEENTH } JUDICIAL CIRCUIT Fall Term, 1973 On Appeal from Inferior Court. Shelby County, Alabama "The State of A

MATHESON, Circuit Judge. In August 2000, an Oklahoma state court jury convicted Clayton Lockett of 19 counts, including burglary, assault, rape, and first degree murder. He was sentenced to 2,285 years and 90 days of imprisonment for his non-capital crimes and sentenced to death for his murder conviction. The Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals (“OCCA”) affirmed Mr. Lockett’s con

157 F.3d 1162 98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7191, 98 Cal. DailyOp. Serv. 7195,98 Daily Journal D.A.R. 9933LOS ANGELES ALLIANCE FOR SURVIVAL; Los Angeles Coalition toEnd Hunger and Homelessness; Jerry Rubin,Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.CITY OF LOS ANGELES; Richard J. Riordan, Mayor of the Cityof Los Angeles, in his official capacity; Bernard Parks,Chief of Police for the City of Los Angeles, in his officialcapacity, D

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 23a0080p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ IN RE: FORD MOTOR COMPANY F-150 AND RANGER TRUCK FUEL ECONOMY │ MARKETING AND SALES PRACTIC

KRAVITCH, Senior Circuit Judge, specially concurring: I concur in the majority’s resolution of appellants’ federal-law claims based on the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 201-209 (the “FLSA”), and appellants’ state-law claim based on the Mobile County Personnel Board’s Rule 3.1(c) (“Rule 3.1(c)”). I also join in the majority’s decision to certify to the Alabama Supreme Court the issue of whether Rule 3.1(c) repealed 1969 Ala. Acts 856 (“Act 856”), a general law of local ap

ORDER & REASONS ELDON E. FALLON, District Judge. Before the Court are a Motion for Declaratory Relief (Rec. Doc. No. 18), filed by Defendant City of New Orleans, and Motions for Preliminary Injunction (Rec. Doc. No. 31) filed by Plaintiffs. The Court, having reviewed the submitted memoranda and the applicable law and having heard testimony from a number of witnesses, is ready to rule. For t

KRAVITCH, Senior Circuit Judge, specially concurring: I concur in the majority’s resolution of appellants’ federal-law claims based on the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 201-209 (the “FLSA”), and appellants’ state-law claim based on the Mobile County Personnel Board’s Rule 3.1(c) (“Rule 3.1(c)”). I also join in the majority’s decision to certify to the Alabama Supreme Court the issue of whether

522 F.Supp.2d 12 (2007) Valda T. JOHNSON, et al., Plaintiffs, v. David HOLWAY, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 03-2513 (ESH). United States District Court, District of Columbia. October 31, 2007. *13 *14 *15 David W. Sanford, Stefanie Roemer, Laura C.

496 F.3d 95 (2007) UNITED STATES of America, Appellee/Cross-Appellant, v. Michael J. D'AMICO, Defendant, Appellant/Cross-Appellee. Nos. 05-1468, 05-1573. United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit. Heard December 6, 2006. Decided August 7, 2007. *97 *96

JAMES C. HILL, Circuit Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part: I concur in both the result and rationale of Part II of the majority’s opinion, vacating moot claims, and Part VIII of the majority’s opinion, reversing the ruling on disqualification of attorney Richard M. Lang-way. I dissent from the majority’s affirmance of sanctions against attorney Richard M.

810 F.Supp. 874 (1993) Charles MIDDLETON, W. Osmund Kelly, III, Brian Sepanak, Bruce Sepanak, Stephen Hill, Gregory Doerr, Barry Saunders, Robert Lorey, Maynard Newman, James McClellan, Mark Campbell, and Thomas Hilgendorf, Plaintiffs, v. The CITY OF FLINT, a municipal corporation, and The Flint Police Officers Association, Defendants. Civ. A. No. 90-CV-40148-FL. United States District Court, E.D. Mich

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER LYNN, District Judge. Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification, filed August 16, 1999, the Response of Grant Thornton and Plaintiffs’ Reply, along with briefs and appendices submitted by the parties. Having considered that material and the applicable authorities, as well as the arguments of counsel at a hearing held on October 11, 2000, and the

DOWD, District Judge, delivered the opinion of the court. I. The appellants, James Ricky Jones (hereafter “Mr. Jones”) and his wife Vera Jones (hereafter collectively “the Joneses”) challenge the district court’s dismissal of their action brought against the City of Carlisle, Kentucky (hereafter “the City”) under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The Joneses also challenge the district court’s remand to state court of th

ORDER We certify the following question to the California Supreme Court all as set forth in the attached request: Is an ordinance1 that seeks to regulate the time, place and manner of solicitation of *1163money or other thing of value or the sale of goods or services content based under the Liberty of Speech Clause o

BARKSDALE, Circuit Judge: In issue is the summary judgment awarded N.A. Chase Manhattan Bank in this action by James C. Thomas, individually and as trustee of the SLT Trust # 1 (SLT), arising out of Chase’s referral of an investment partner, E. Lawrence Price. Previously, we held that Thomas lacked standing on certain claims, and as a result, affirmed the judgment as to them; re