Cases

*175 OPINION YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice. Olivia Vargas alleged in the trial court that she was injured after automatic doors at Appellant’s hospital malfunctioned and closed on her prematurely. In what would otherwise be a “garden variety” slip-and-fall case, we must

661 A.2d 48 (1995) VARGAS MANUFACTURING CO. v. Jay FRIEDMAN et al. No. 93-229-A. Supreme Court of Rhode Island. June 21, 1995. Robert Fine, Licht & Semonoff, Providence, for plaintiff. Christopher Fay, Fay & Fay, Cranston Kara Fay, Fay & Fay, Providence, for defendant. OPINION WEISBERGER, Chief Justice. This case com

Vargas v Akbar (2014 NY Slip Op 08985) Vargas v Akbar 2014 NY Slip Op 08985 Decided on December 24, 2014 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law §

JULIE J. VARGAS, Judge MEGAN P. DUFFY, Judge

699 F.Supp.2d 397 (2010) Marisela RODRIGUEZ-RIVAS, et al., Plaintiff(s) v. POLICE DEPT. OF PUERTO RICO, Defendant(s). Civil No. 06-1197 (JAG). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. March 12, 2010. *399 Raul S. Mariani-Franco, Mariani Franco Law Office, San Juan, PR, for Plaintiffs. Harold A. Frye-Maldonado, Wandyma

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 18-1990 ANTONIO SANTANA-VARGAS, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. BANCO SANTANDER PUERTO RICO; SANTANDER FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC., Defendants, Appellees. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO [Hon. Jay A. García-Gregory, U.S. District Judge]

536 F.Supp.2d 135 (2008) Lorenzo E. PEREZ MONTERO, et al., Plaintiff(s) v. CPC LOGISTICS, INC., Defendant(s). Civil No. 05-1903 (JAG). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. February 20, 2008. As Amended March 3, 2008. *136 Carlos M. Vergne-Vargas, Jose A. Rios-Rosa, Carlos M. Vergne Law Office, San Juan,

PD-0229-15 No. __________________ __________________________________________ In the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals _______________________________________ Victor James Vargas Appellant, v. March 2, 2015 The State of Texas

OPINION AND ORDER GUSTAVO A. GELPI, United States District Judge In what appears to be a concerted tautological strategy,to resuscitate claims in light of a medical malpractice settlement’s interruption by a bankruptcy proceeding, Lizbeth Vargas Colón (“Vargas Colón”), in representation of her minor daughter L.C.V. (“Minor L.C.V.”), and her sons Jaime Manuel Cedeño Vargas and Jaime Alexander Cedeño Vargas (“

ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR REMAND URSULA UNGARO, District Judge. THIS CAUSE is before the Court on Defendant, Advance Auto Part’s Notice of Removal (D.E. 1), Plaintiffs Motion for Remand and for Attorney’s Fees and Costs (D.E. 4), and Defendant’s Response to Plaintiffs Motion. (D.E. 6.) THIS Court has considered Plaintiffs Motion1 (D.E.

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO MODIFY THE PRE-TRIAL SCHEDULE URSULA UNGARO, District Judge. THIS CAUSE is before the Court on Plaintiff Niurka De Varona’s (“Varona”) Motion to Extend the Deadline to Add Parties and Amend the Pleadings. (D.E. 36.) Defendant Discount Auto Parts, LLC d/b/a Advance Auto Parts (“Advance Auto”) answered in opposition to the instant Motion. (D.E. 42.) The Court has considere

750 F.Supp. 677 (1990) Josephine VARGAS, Martin Ellerbee, Marion Gargiulo, Joann Wheeler, Janice Sellers, Maria Rivera, Margarita Gonzalez, Plaintiffs, v. Christine CALABRESE, individually and in her capacity as former Chairperson of Hudson County Board of Elections, Frank Caleca, Lee S. Lichtenberger, the Hudson County Superintendent of Elections, Harvey L. Birne, as Hudson County Superintendent of Elections, Gerald McCann, individually and in h

Volume 1 of 2 FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  Plaintiff-Appellee, No. 02-50663 v.  D.C. No. STEVE NAVARRO-VARGAS, CR-02-01706-MLH Defendant-Appellant.  Appeal from the United States District Court f

714 F.Supp. 714 (1989) Josephine VARGAS, Martin Ellerbee, Marion Gargiulo, Joann Wheeler, Janice Sellers, Maria Rivera, Margarita Gonzalez, Plaintiffs, v. Christine CALABRESE, individually and in her official capacity as former Chairperson of the Hudson County Board of Elections, Frank Caleca, Lee S. Lichtenberger, the Hudson County Superintendent of Elections, Harvey L. Birne, as Hudson County Superintendent of Elections, Gerald McCann, individu

ORDER EDWIN G. TORRES, United States Magistrate Judge. This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs Motion to Compel Depositions [D.E. 36], to which Defendants responded in opposition, and Plaintiff replied. Upon review of the record and supporting materials on the motion, the motion is Denied without prejudice. 1. Plaintiffs motion seeks to depose two corporate officers wh

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-99-00259-CR Bernard Rene Vargas, Appellant v.

THOMAS, Circuit Judge. This case involves a dispute over a Bureau of Reclamation project to build a concrete-lined canal to replace an unlined portion of the All-American Canal. The district court denied declaratory and in-junctive relief. A motions panel of our Court granted a temporary injunction halting work on the project pending appeal. After the initial oral argument and

56 F.3d 61NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. ORLANDO OSPINA-VARGAS, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.UNITED STATES of America; Gianvittore Fabbri, Chief Judge,Tribunale di Roma Terza Sezione Penale; Stefano Palla,Judge,

652 F.3d 1249 (2011) Scott GARRETT and Pamela Jane Garrett, Trustees of the Scott Garrett and Pamela Garrett Family Trust dated June 14, 1999; Scott Garrett, individually; Pamela Garrett, individually, Plaintiffs-Appellees, Wheeler Peak Consulting, Inc., Plaintiff, and Wells Fargo Bank New Mexico, N.A., successor to Wells Fargo Bank New Mexico; Wells Fargo & Company, a Delaware corporation; Garrett Capital, LLC, a New Mexico Limited Liability

OPINION Opinion by: Karen Angelini, Justice Emma1 appeals the trial court’s order terminating her parental rights to her son, D.M. In three issues, Emma contends the evidence was legally and factually insufficient to support the trial court’s statutory endangerment and best interest findings. Because we conclude the evidence was legally and factually sufficient