Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “JACOBS v. GARLAND”
Jacobs v. Garlandpublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JOHNNIE L. JACOBS, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 22-cv-654-MJS PAMELA BONDI, 1 Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Between 2011 and 2015, Plaintiff Johnnie Jacobs worked in the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s (“FBI”) Office of Equal Employment Opportunity Affairs as
Strickland v. Jacobspublic domain
WALLACE, Judge. Hank Strickland appeals a final summary judgment entered in favor of James M. Moyles, III, and Lenore Jacobs, as Trustee of Coastal Land Trust (Coastal). We affirm the final summary judgment in favor of Mr. Moyles, but we reverse the final summary judgment in favor of Coastal. I. THE FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND On August 80, 2007, Mr. Strickland filed a one-count
Smith v. City of Garlandpublic domain
OPINION Opinion by Justice Boatright This is a dispute about promotions in the City of Garland (“City”) fire department. The City sued appellant Randy E. Smith and many other City fire fighters, including the people who are now appellees in this case. The City voluntarily; dismissed Smith from the suit, but-he later intervened, suing the City and the fire fighters who the City had not dismis
Singh v. Garlandpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JASWINDER SINGH, No. 23-95 Agency No. Petitioner, A216-276-233 v. OPINION MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Arg
Singh v. Garlandpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JASWINDER SINGH, No. 23-95 Agency No. Petitioner, A216-276-233 v. OPINION MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Arg
Chen v. Garlandpublic domain
19-715-ag Chen v. Garland 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 2 FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT 3 4 August Term, 2022 5 6 (Submitted: November 18, 2022 Decided: July 25, 2023) 7 8 Docket No. 19-715-ag 9 10 _____________________________________ 11 12 ZHI BO CHEN, AKA ZHIBO CHEN, AKA CHEN ZHIBO, AKA BO LIN, 13 14
TikTok Inc. v. Garlandpublic domain
PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 604 U. S. Part 1 Pages 56–85 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT January 17, 2025 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are
Sarr v. Garlandpublic domain
20-3836 Sarr v. Garland UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term 2021 (Submitted: April 19, 2022 Decided: October 12, 2022) No. 20-3836 –––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– MAMADOU AMADOU SARR Petitioner,
Bertrand v. Garlandpublic domain
Case: 19-60620 Document: 00516343740 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/03/2022 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 19-60620 June 3, 2022
Chen v. Garlandpublic domain
19-4162 Chen v. Garland In the United States Court of Appeals FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT AUGUST TERM 2021 No. 19-4162 LI CHEN, Petitioner, v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an
Adeeko v. Garlandpublic domain
Case: 19-60703 Document: 00515923333 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/01/2021 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED July 1, 2021
Garcia-Gonzalez v. Garlandpublic domain
Case: 22-60501 Document: 00516848039 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/07/2023 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________
Singh v. Garlandpublic domain
19-704-ag Singh v. Garland In the United States Court of Appeals FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT AUGUST TERM 2020 No. 19-704-ag JAGDEEP SINGH, Petitioner, v. MERRICK GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL, Respondent. *
Peguero Vasquez v. Garlandpublic domain
21-6380 Peguero Vasquez v. Garland IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT ____________________ August Term, 2022 Argued: September 28, 2022 Decided: September 13, 2023 No. 21-6380 ____________________ JO
Castillo-Gutierrez v. Garlandpublic domain
Case: 20-60492 Document: 00516422007 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/05/2022 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED August 5, 2022
Pinel-Gomez v. Garlandpublic domain
19-3124-ag Pinel-Gomez v. Garland In the United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit August Term, 2021 No. 19-3124-ag MAURICIO DAGOBERTO PINEL-GOMEZ, J. L. P-E., Petitioners, v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL, Respondent.
Jacobs v. Statepublic domain
OPINION ON APPELLANT'S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW Appellant was convicted by a jury of involuntary manslaughter. TEX.PENAL CODE ANN. § 19.05. The jury assessed his punishment at confinement for four years in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division. On direct appeal, the Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction in an unpublished opinion, Jacobs v. State, No. 01-89-00195, 1990 WL 144041 (Tex.App. — Houston [1st]
John E. Garland v. Sharon L. Garland (mem. dec.)public domain
MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be FILED regarded as precedent or cited before any Mar 01 2019, 8:44 am court except for the purpose of establishing CLERK Indiana Supreme Court the defense of res judicata, collateral
Francisco Reyes-Corado v. Merrick Garlandpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT FRANCISCO JAVIER REYES- No. 18-70225 CORADO, Agency No. Petitioner, A098-799-409 v. OPINION MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Garland v. Shapiropublic domain
579 F.Supp. 858 (1984) Richard D. GARLAND, Plaintiff, v. Harold T. SHAPIRO, Henry Johnson, Thomas A. Moorehead, Donald Deskins, Deliah Jacobs, Kathleen Dannemiller, Aubrey Pruitt, George R. Carter, Bruce Pringle, Armando Lopez, John Powell, and the Board of Regents of the University of Michigan, Defendants. Civ. A. No. 83-CV-6255-AA. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, S.D.