Cases

Petition for rehearing denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

604 F.Supp.2d 84 (2009) Roger JACKMAN, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 07-691 (RWR). United States District Court, District of Columbia. March 30, 2009. *85 Roger Jackman, Seagoville, TX, pro se. Kenneth Adebonojo, U.S. Attorney's Office, Washington, DC, Scott D. Cheney, Utah Att

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ROGER JACKMAN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 07-691 (RWR) ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al., ) ) Defendants.

PER CURIAM: Appellant Richard P. Jackman contends the district court erred in limiting his access to computers as a special condition of supervised release. Because Jackman entered into a valid waiver of his appellate rights that explicitly covered supervised release, we dismiss the appeal. Jackman pleaded guilty to one count of transporting child pornography, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(a)(l)' (2000

ORDER PER CURIAM. Upon review of Donald G. Jackman, Jr.’s recently-docketed notice of appeal, we consider whether the appeal should be dismissed. On January 8, 2007, Jackman filed an appeal seeking review of the decision of the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania denying his motion to transfer his criminal case to the United States Court of

ON MOTION PER CURIAM. ORDER The United States moves to dismiss Donald G. Jackman, Jr.’s appeal for lack of jurisdiction. This is an appeal in a criminal case. Jackman was found guilty of violating federal firearms laws. The district court’s judgment was affirmed by the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. Jackman filed various motions in

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Justice ALITO took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8.Justice ALITO took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and this petition.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Former decision, 133 S.Ct. 2350.Petition for rehearing denied.

Motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8.

STAHL, Circuit Judge. In this appeal of his conviction for bank robbery, defendant-appellant Gary W. Jack-man alleges an abuse of discretion in certain of the district court’s evidentiary rulings. Finding no abuse of discretion, we affirm'. I. BACKGROUND On December 24, 1992, a m

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER GORTON, District Judge. On July 15, 1993, defendant, Gary Jack-man, filed a motion seeking the suppression of testimony resulting from a line-up conducted on January 20, 1993 in this case. As grounds for this motion, defendant submitted that the line-up was unnecessarily suggestive and unreliable, and thus, in violation of defendant’s due process rights. In furtherance of his motion, def

USCA1 Opinion United States Court of Appeals United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit For the First Circuit ____________________ No. 94-1759 UNITED STATES,

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.

JON 0. NEWMAN, Chief Judge: This appeal concerns a procedure adopted by clerical staff in the District Court for the District of Connecticut to remedy a jury selection process that had inadvertently, but systematically, excluded from petit jury veni-res all residents of Hartford and New Britain, communities with large minority populations. The adequacy of this procedure, no longer in use, is challenged by Gary W. Jackman o