⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “J.U. v. Salt Lake County”

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005-10-03 · Published · cited 123× · 425 F.3d 1249; 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 21396; 2005 WL 2421618
KELLY, Circuit Judge. Plaintiffs-Appellants Utah Gospel Mission, First Unitarian Church of Salt Lake City, Utah National Organization for Women, and Lee J. Seigel appeal the district court’s denial of a preliminary injunction and grant of the motion for dismissal for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) ma
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2025-08-05 · Published · cited 0×
Appellate Case: 23-4059 Document: 91 Date Filed: 08/05/2025 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS August 5, 2025
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014-06-13 · Published · cited 22× · 754 F.3d 864; 2014 WL 2619799; 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 11021; 123 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 510
GORSUCH, Circuit Judge. The trouble began when Michael Barrett, a Salt Lake County employee, helped a colleague pursue a sexual harassment complaint against her boss. The complaint was entirely warranted but some in management apparently didn’t like the publicity. According to Mr. Barrett, his superiors thought him a noisy troublemaker and began a campaign to have him discharged
Court of Appeals of Utah · 1990-06-07 · Published · cited 10× · 794 P.2d 482; 136 Utah Adv. Rep. 38; 1990 Utah App. LEXIS 101; 1990 WL 75602
794 P.2d 482 (1990) SANDY CITY, a municipal corporation, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. SALT LAKE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Utah; Salt Lake County Planning Commission; K. Delyn Yeates; R. Scott Priest; W. Scott Kjar; Steven E. Smoot; Postero-Blecker, Inc.; and Chevron U.S.A., Inc., Defendants and Appellees. No. 880429-CA. Court of Appeals of Utah. June 7, 199
Utah Supreme Court · 2021-01-28 · Published · cited 9× · 484 P.3d 1134; 2021 UT 4
This opinion is subject to revision before final publication in the Pacific Reporter 2021 UT 4 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF UTAH LEONID FELDMAN, personally and as personal representative of the estate of LIUDMILA FELDMAN; MARINA DONNELLY; and ANTON KHOKHLOV Appellants, v.
Court of Appeals of Utah · 2020-10-16 · Published · cited 5× · 476 P.3d 989; 2020 UT App 139
2020 UT App 139 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION, SALT LAKE CITY DEPARTMENT OF AIRPORTS, AND TOOELE VALLEY AIRPORT, Appellants and Cross-appellees, v. DICK D. KUNZ, DICK DARWIN KUNZ, BARBARA JEAN KUNZ, AND NEIL NORRIS KUNZ, Appellees and Cross-appellants. Opinion No. 20190010-CA
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2022-12-05 · Published · cited 7× · 54 F.4th 1232
Appellate Case: 21-4102 Document: 010110777520 Date Filed: 12/05/2022 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS December 5, 2022
Utah Supreme Court · 2019-01-23 · Published · cited 23× · 2019 UT 4; 435 P.3d 248
Justice Pearce, opinion of the Court: INTRODUCTION ¶1 Salt Lake City requires that any individual employed by an escort service agency, or any other sexually oriented business, obtain a license from the City before providing services. When Karlie Kidd met an undercover Salt Lake City police officer at the Grand America Hotel and asked him for a
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009-10-27 · Published · cited 340× · 584 F.3d 1304; 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 23677; 2009 WL 3430758
HOLMES, Circuit Judge. Plaintiffs-Appellants Amy Thomson, individually and as guardian ad litem for her two children, and the estate of Chad Thomson, through Ms. Thomson as its personal representative, challenge the district court’s grant of summary judgment for Defendants-Appellees Salt Lake County and Deputy Alan Morrieal. First, Plaintiffs argue that it was error to grant summary judgment to Deputy Morrieal on the basis
Utah Supreme Court · 2020-05-18 · Published · cited 5× · 466 P.3d 178; 2020 UT 29
This opinion is subject to revision before final publication in the Pacific Reporter 2020 UT 29 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF UTAH SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION and METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT OF SALT LAKE & SANDY, Respondents, v. MARK C. HAIK and PEARL RATY, as Trustee of the Pearl Raty Trust,
Utah Supreme Court · 2020-05-18 · Published · cited 11× · 466 P.3d 158; 2020 UT 27
This opinion is subject to revision before final publication in the Pacific Reporter 2020 UT 27 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF UTAH SALT LAKE COUNTY, DUCHESNE COUNTY, UINTAH COUNTY, WASHINGTON COUNTY, and WEBER COUNTY, political subdivisions of the State of Utah, Appellants, v. STATE OF UT
Utah Supreme Court · 2017-09-26 · Published · cited 4× · 2017 UT 67; 416 P.3d 338; 848 Utah Adv. Rep. 50; 2017 WL 4276112; 2017 Utah LEXIS 159
Justice Himonas, opinion of the Court: INTRODUCTION ¶ 1 About six years ago, the tech revolution reached Salt Lake City's parking meter infrastructure. In response, the City switched from Industrial-era, coin-operated, single-space parking meters (where each parking space had its own meter) to a postindustrial system of multi-space, credit-card
Utah Supreme Court · 2015-08-14 · Published · cited 36× · 2015 UT 73; 358 P.3d 1067; 793 Utah Adv. Rep. 28; 2015 Utah LEXIS 219; 2015 WL 4878274
This opinion is subject to revision before final publication in the Pacific Reporter 2015 UT 73 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF UTAH SALT LAKE CITY, Respondent, v. RICARDO ENRIQUE CARRERA, Petitioner.
Utah Supreme Court · 2010-06-11 · Published · cited 44× · 2010 UT 45; 234 P.3d 1105; 658 Utah Adv. Rep. 25; 2010 Utah LEXIS 98; 2010 WL 2332985
234 P.3d 1105 (2010) 2010 UT 45 SALT LAKE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Utah, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. HOLLIDAY WATER COMPANY, a Utah corporation, Defendant and Appellant. No. 20080522. Supreme Court of Utah. June 11, 2010. *1107 Lohra L. Miller, T.J. Tsakalos, Craig W. Anderson, Salt L
Utah Supreme Court · 2004-11-23 · Published · cited 37× · 2004 UT 98; 104 P.3d 1208; 513 Utah Adv. Rep. 23; 2004 Utah LEXIS 219; 2004 WL 2659178
2004 UT 98 David Carrier and Save Our Canyons and its members, Plaintiffs and Appellees, v. Salt Lake County, Salt Lake County Planning Commission and Salt Lake County Board of Adjustment, Defendants and Appellants. No. 20020946. Supreme Court of Utah. FILED November 23, 2004. This opinion is subject to revision before final publication in the Pacific Reporter.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2025-10-09 · Published · cited 0×
Appellate Case: 23-4058 Document: 74-1 Date Filed: 10/09/2025 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS October 9, 2025
Utah Supreme Court · 2017-03-13 · Published · cited 5× · 2017 UT 14
This opinion is subject to revision before final publication in the Pacific Reporter 2017 UT 14 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF UTAH MARK C. HAIK, Appellant, v. SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION, Appellee
Utah Supreme Court · 2017-03-10 · Published · cited 14× · 2017 UT 14; 393 P.3d 285; 2017 WL 986202
On Direct Appeal Justice Himonas, opinion of the Court: INTRODUCTION ¶ 1 In 1997, Mark Haik litigated a lawsuit in federal court based on strikingly similar facts to the one that he now seeks to pursue in the third distinct, and he lost on the merits. See Haik v. Town of Alta, No. 974202,
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991-02-22 · Published · cited 0× · 926 F.2d 974; 1991 WL 19474
LOGAN, Circuit Judge. Plaintiffs, Utah Power & Light (UP & L) and more than one hundred of its subscriber cities, towns and counties in Utah and Wyoming, appeal the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of defendants, the Western Area Power Administration (WAPA), the Department of Energy (DOE), and various officials of these agencies. The district court found that WAPA’s interpretation of federal law go
Utah Supreme Court · 2013-12-17 · Published · cited 16× · 322 P.3d 669; 750 Utah Adv. Rep. 31; 2013 UT 75; 2013 WL 6623551; 2013 Utah LEXIS 198
Justice DURHAM, opinion of the Court: INTRODUCTION ¶ 1 Alexander Kerr injured himself when he tripped on a sidewalk defect in Salt Lake City. He sued the city and obtained a judgment in his favor. Salt Lake City now appeals, alleging: (1) the city is entitled to discretionary function immunity, (2) Mr. Kerr did not present evidence that the city had adequate notice of the sidewalk defect duri