Cases

ACCEPTED 06-15-00061-cv SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS TEXARKANA, TEXAS 10/26/2015 9:54:40 PM

Chief Justice HECHT delivered the opinion of the Court. In actions for unintentional torts, the common law has long restricted recovery of purely economic damages unaccompanied by injury to the plaintiff or his property 1 — a doctrine we have referred to as the economic loss rule.

ACCEPTED 03-15-00280-CV 6142048 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

ACCEPTED 03-15-00007-CV 7091545 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUST

ACCEPTED 03-15-00007-CV 7091444 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

[Cite as Shephard v. CrossCountry Mtge., Inc., 2025-Ohio-1929.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA CHERYL SHEPHARD, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 114149 v. : CROSSCOUNTRY MORTGAGE, IN

829 F.Supp. 782 (1993) Robert D. SCHULMAN t/a Maxi's Express, v. J.P. MORGAN INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT, INC. and Widener Funding Corp., Inc. Civ. A. No. 92-2853. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. August 10, 1993. *783 Daniel J. Dugan, Philadelphia, PA, for plaintiff. Leonard S. Baum, New York City, M. Melvin Shr

PAUL A. BONIN, Judge. I,At the prompting of its local counsel, Brennan’s Inc. engaged the services of Maryland attorney, Edward Tuck Colbert, because of his specialized expertise in trademark-infringement law an^ litigation. At the time, Brennan’s owned the world-famous New Orleans restaurant of the same name, along with registered trademarks and trade names.1 Younger rela

796 F.Supp.2d 520 (2011) STORED VALUE SOLUTIONS, INC., ("n/k/a") Ceridian Stored Value Solutions, Inc., Plaintiff, v. CARD ACTIVATION TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Defendant. C.A. No. 09-495-KAJ. United States District Court, D. Delaware. July 1, 2011. *523 Richard L. Horwitz, Esq. and David E. Moore, Esq., Potter Anderson & Corroon LL

7/29/2022 10:37:59 AM Compare Results Old File: New File: 20-843.pdf 20-843_new.pdf versus 135 pages (609 KB) 135 pages

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2021 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit

FILED IN st 1 COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TX 12/07/2015 CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE, NO. CLERK IN THE FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF TE

709 F.Supp.2d 1037 (2010) Elaine L. CHAO, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor, Plaintiff, v. WESTSIDE DRYWALL, INC., a corporation; and Mohsen Salem, and Shirine Salem, Defendants. Civ. No. 08-6302-AC. United States District Court, D. Oregon, Portland Division. April 28, 2010. As Amended May 13, 2010.

ACCEPTED 15-25-00109-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 6/23/2025 5:08 PM NO. __-__-______-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

STUART, Justice. White-Spunner Construction, Inc., and Hartford Fire Insurance Company (“Hartford”) appeal the summary judgment and the award of attorney fees in favor of Construction Completion Company, LLC (“CCC”), in CCC’s action alleging that White-Spunner failed to pay it for labor and materials it provided as a subcontractor to White-Spunner in the fall of 2008 in conjunction with White-Spunner’s work as the general cont

626 S.E.2d 861 (2006) Theresa D. HALL, Administratrix of the Estate of Michael H. Hall, and Theresa D. Hall, Individually, Plaintiffs, v. TOREROS, II, INC., Defendant. No. COA05-199. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. March 7, 2006. Thomas, Ferguson & Mullins, L.L.P., by Jay H. Ferguson, Durham, for plaintiffs. Patterson, Dilthey, Clay, Bryson & Ande

GARY M. GAERTNER, Sr., Presiding Judge. Appellant, Déjá Vu of Missouri, Inc., (“appellant”), appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis granting a motion for summary judgment in favor of the respondents, Ta-layna’s Laclede’s Landing, Inc. and Michael P. Faille, (collectively, “respondents”). We affirm. Appellant operated numerous nightclubs around the nation exhibiting nude and s

449 F.Supp.2d 992 (2006) Barbara SCHWAB et al., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC., R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., Lorillard Tobacco Co., Ligget Group, Inc., American Tobacco Co., Altria Group, Inc., British American Tobacco (Investments) Ltd., Defendants. No. 04-CV-1945(JBW). United States District Court

670 F.Supp.2d 705 (2009) Rita THAKORE, Plaintiff, v. UNIVERSAL MACHINE CO. OF POTTSTOWN, INC., Defendant. No. 05 C 5262. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. September 25, 2009. *708 David E. Rapoport, Joshua Lawrence Weisberg, Paul David Richter, Rapoport Law Offices, P.C., Chicago, II, Steven Michael S

236 F.Supp.2d 637 (2001) TOP RANK, INC. et alia., Plaintiffs and Counterclaim Defendants, v. Armando GUTIERREZ, Individually and d/b/a Armando's Bar-B-Q Inn,[1] et alia., Defendants, Counterclaim Plaintiffs, and Third-Party Plaintiffs v. Paragon Communications, Inc. d/b/a Time Warner Cable and f/k/a Paragon Cable, Third-Party Defendant. No. SA-99-CA-880-FB. No. SA-99-CA-881. No. SA-99-CA-987.