Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “J & J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Lagunas”
In re Circuit City Stores, Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION KEVIN R. HUENNEKENS, Bankruptcy Judge. The debtors, Circuit City Stores, Inc., et al, (the “Debtors,” or “Circuit City”) filed these bankruptcy cases under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code on November 10, 2008 (the “Petition Date”).1 The Debtors’ bankruptcy cases were consolidated for joint administration pursuant to Rule 1015(b) of the Fed
Mvl USA, Inc. v. United Statespublic domain
In the United States Court of Federal Claims Nos. 24-1057, 24-1077, 24-1144, 24-1219, 24-1398, 24-1433, 24-1461 (Filed: 21 January 2025) * *************************************** MVL USA, Inc., et al., * * Plaintiffs, * * Nos. 24-1057, v. *
Slaven v. BP America, Inc.public domain
786 F.Supp. 853 (1992) Donald SLAVEN; Salvatore Russo; Carl Gassaway; Yeriko Nitta, d/b/a the Seacliff Motel; Salvatore Manzella; Steven Panto and Donna Panto; Heinz Pet Products Company, A Division of Star-Kist Foods, Inc., a California Corporation; Gregory Kuglis; and Jack Morici, On Behalf of Themselves and All Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs, v. BP AMERICA, INC.; BP Oil Shipping Co., U.S.A.; BP Oil Supply Company; American Trading Transportati
Holifield v. BP America, Inc.public domain
786 F.Supp. 840 (1991) Chet HOLIFIELD, an Individual, Don Slaven, an Individual, Yeriko Nitta, d/b/a the Seacliff Motel on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs, v. BP AMERICA, INC.; BP Oil Shipping Co., USA; American Trading Transportation, Co. Inc.; American Trading and Production Corp.; and the Trans-Alaska Pipeline Liability Fund; Golden West Refining Company and Brandenburger Marine, Inc., Defendants. Branko
Vici Racing, LLC v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.public domain
OPINION SUE L. ROBINSON, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff VICI Racing, LLC (“VICI” or “plaintiff’), a Florida corporation with its principal place of business in Miami, Florida, filed this suit against defendant T-Mobile USA, Inc. (“T-Mobile” or “defendant”), a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in Bellevue, Washington, on September 30, 2010. (D.I. 1) Plaint
Independent Ink, Inc. v. Illinois Tool Works, Inc.public domain
DYK, Circuit Judge. Independent Ink, Inc. (“Independent”) appeals from the judgment of the United States District Court for the Central District of California in this patent tying antitrust action. The district court granted summary judgment on plaintiff Independent’s Sherman Act section 1 claim because Independent had failed to produce any evidence of market power over the ty
Miller v. COLLECTORS UNIVERSE, INC.public domain
65 Cal.Rptr.3d 351 (2007) 154 Cal.App.4th 1047 William W. MILLER, Plaintiff, Cross-defendant and Appellant, v. COLLECTORS UNIVERSE, INC., Defendant, Cross-complainant and Appellant. No. G036432. Court of Appeal of California, Fourth District, Division Three. August 30, 2007. *352 Boudreau, Albert & Woh
In Re Circuit City Stores, Inc.public domain
447 B.R. 475 (2009) In re CIRCUIT CITY STORES, INC., et al., Debtors. No. 08-35653. United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia, Richmond Division. February 12, 2009. Robin S. Abramowitz, Lazer, Aptheker, Rosella & Yedid, P.C., Melville, NY, for *476 Bond Circuit VIII Delaware Business Trust. Angela Sheffler Abreu, McCarter
Bunch v. Hoffinger Industries, Inc.public domain
20 Cal.Rptr.3d 780 (2004) 123 Cal.App.4th 1278 Leesa BUNCH, a Minor, etc., Plaintiff and Respondent, v. HOFFINGER INDUSTRIES, INC., et al., Defendants, Cross-Defendants and Appellants; McMasker Enterprises, Inc., Cross-Complainant and Respondent. No. C040177. Court of Appeal, Third District. November 8, 2004. Rehearing Denied Decembe
No Fear, Inc. v. Imagine Films, Inc.public domain
930 F.Supp. 1381 (1995) NO FEAR, INC., Plaintiff, v. IMAGINE FILMS, INC., et al., Defendants. No. CV 94-6414 RG (Ex). United States District Court, C.D. California. July 5, 1995. Kit M. Stetina, William J. Brucker, Stetina Brunda & Buyan, Laguna Hills, CA, for No Fear, Inc. Maren Christensen, Gail Migdal Title, Jeffrey Ian Abrams, Rosenfeld Meyer & Su
634 F.Supp.2d 1045 (2007) NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, INC.; Sierra Club; and Central Sierra Environmental Resource Center, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE; and Jack Troyer, in his official capacity as Regional Forester, Intermountain Region, Defendants. No. S-05-02590WBS GGH. United States District Court, E.D. California. September 5, 2007.
Idaho Sporting Congress Inc. v. Alexanderpublic domain
HUG, Chief Judge. Idaho Sporting Congress and the Ecology Center (collectively, “ISC”) appeal the district court’s denial of their motion for a preliminary injunction to prevent the United States Forest Service (“Forest Service”) from proceeding with certain timber sales in the Payette National Forest (“PNF”). ISC claims that the Environmental Assessments and Environmental Impact Statements prepared by the Forest Service in
Idaho Sporting Congress Inc. v. David Alexanderpublic domain
222 F.3d 562 (9th Cir. 2000) IDAHO SPORTING CONGRESS INC.; THE ECOLOGY CENTER, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.DAVID ALEXANDER, Supervisor, Payette National Forest; UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, an agency of the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Defendants-Appellees,INTERMOUNTAIN FOREST INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION; BOISE CASCADE CORPORATION; EVERGREEN FOREST PRODUCTS, INC., Intervenors-Appellees. No. 99-35847
Idaho Sporting Congress, Inc. v. U.S. Forest Servicepublic domain
31 F.Supp.2d 1236 (1996) IDAHO SPORTING CONGRESS, INC., Plaintiff, v. U.S. FOREST SERVICE, Defendant, and Intermountain Forest Industry Assn., Intervenor. Civ. No. 96-0025-S-BLW. United States District Court, D. Idaho. September 25, 1996. *1237 D. Bernard Zaleha, Boise, ID, Thomas J. Woodbury, Marc D. Fink, Idaho Sporting
ACCEPTED 03-14-00706-CV 5038192 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
Buchan v. United States Cycling Federation, Inc.public domain
JOHNSON, J.. I respectfully dissent. If the facts in this case were as stated by the majority I would join in voting to reverse the judgment. The majority opinion leads one to believe this is a case about a bicycle racer, with “dreams” of going to the Olympics, who fell off her bicycle and was injured in the course of a race. The majority opinion misstates the facts in this case by omitting any mention of the c
This Opinion Is a Precedent of the TTAB Hearing: July 26, 2022 Mailed: November 30, 2022 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _____ Trademark Trial and Appeal Board _____ Mystery Ranch, Ltd.
Henry Hope X-Ray Products, Inc. v. Marron Carrel, Inc., an Arizona Corporation and Karl Ungarpublic domain
SKOPIL, Circuit Judge: STATEMENT OF THE CASE Henry Hope X-Ray Products, Inc. (“Hope”) designs, manufactures, and sells film processing equipment, including roller transport processors. Hope’s film processors process thin-base roll film without the attachment of a leader to the film. Only Hope makes machines
Perez v. Oakdale Irrigation Dist.public domain
Filed 12/20/23; Certified for Publication 1/8/24 (order attached) IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT MARIA RUIZ PEREZ et al., F084621 Plaintiffs and Appellants, (Stanislaus Super. Ct. v.
Friends of the Inyo v. Usfspublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT FRIENDS OF THE INYO; No. 23-15492 WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT; CENTER FOR D.C. No. BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY; 2:21-cv-01955- SIERRA CLUB, KJM-KJN Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. OPINION UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE; LEEANN MURPHY, Defendants-Appellees, KORE MINING, LTD