Cases

(2008) J & J SPORTS PRODUCTIONS, INC., as Broadcast Licensee of the May 6, 2006 DeLaHoya/Mayorga Program, Plaintiff, v. Martha GUZMAN,[1] et al., Defendants. No. 06-CV-6840 (NGG)(RML). United States District Court, E.D. New York. April 4, 2008. MEMORANDUM & ORDER NICHOLAS G. GARAUFIS, District Judge. On May 8, 2007, this co

MEMORANDUM EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, J. Plaintiff J & J Sports Productions, Inc. (“Plaintiff’ or “J & J”) brings this action against Defendants All Star Sports Bar & Grille, Inc. (“All Star Sports Bar”) and individual Charles A. Hackett (“Hackett”), alleging commercial piracy of a certain boxing match between Miguel Cotto and Sergio Martinez, in violation of the Communications Act of 1934.

ORDER RE MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DAMAGES CHARLES R. BREYER, District Judge. This case arises out of the display of a pay-per-view program at a commercial es*911tablishment. J & J Sports Productions (“J & J”), the commercial distributor of certain programs, sued Joseph Coyne, Rafael Hernandez, and 2X Play LLC (collectively “Double P

ACCEPTED 03-15-00293-CV 8312780 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

463 F.Supp.2d 949 (2006) PROBATTER SPORTS, LLC, Plaintiff/Counterclaim-Defendant, v. JOYNER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Defendant/Counterclaim-Plaintiff. No. 05-CV-2045-LRR. United States District Court, N.D. Iowa, Eastern Division. November 3, 2006. *950 Stephen J. Holtman, Simmons Perrine Albright Ellwood, Cedar Rapids, IA, Susan M. Sc

JUSTICE WILLETT delivered the opinion of the Court, in which CHIEF JUSTICE HECHT, JUSTICE GREEN, JUSTICE GUZMAN, JUSTICE LEHRMÁNN, JUSTICE BOYD, JUSTICE DEVINE, and JUSTICE BROWN joined, and in Parts I, II.B, III.C, and IV of which JUSTICE JOHNSON joined. Nearly a century ago,'a Texas attorney argued that the rule at issue hi this case made it “cheaper to kill a mare in Texas than it

ACCEPTED 03-15-00085-CV 5176028 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER1 BESOSA, District Judge. Before the Court is the motion to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 12(b)(1) (“Rule 12(b)(1)”) filed by defendant Candido Gutierrez-Guzman d/b/a General Distribution. For the reasons discussed below, the Court GRANTS defendant’s motion and dismisses this case, without prejudice. I. BACKGRO

871 F.2d 270 1989 A.M.C. 1232, 8 UCC Rep.Serv.2d 1 Thomas J. MATTHEWS and Kathleen Matthews,Plaintiffs-Appellees-Appellants,v.CTI CONTAINER TRANSPORT INTERNATIONAL INC., et al.,Defendants-Appellants-Appellees. Nos. 460-464, Docket 88-7571, 88-7573, 88-7659, 88-7667, 88-7689. United States Court of Appeals,Second Circuit. Argue

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ADIDAS AMERICA, INC., a Delaware No. 16-35204 corporation; ADIDAS AG; ADIDAS INTERNATIONAL MARKETING B.V., a D.C. No. foreign entity, 3:15-cv-01741- Plaintiffs-Appellees, HZ v. OPINION SKECHERS USA, INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 20-1936 DR. JUAN M. RODRIGUEZ-RIVERA, d/b/a "Centro Reumatologico Dr. Juan Rodriguez", Plaintiff, Appellant, v. ALLSCRIPTS HEALTHCARE SOLUTIONS, INC.; ALLSCRIPTS HEALTHCARE, LLC, Defendants, Appellees, HEALTHCARE DATA SOLUTIONS, LLC, a/k/a HDSOSF, LLC; INSURANCE

USCA4 Appeal: 20-1001 Doc: 134 Filed: 06/14/2022 Pg: 1 of 103 ON REHEARING EN BANC PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 20-1001 BONNIE PELTIER, as Guardian of A.P., a minor child; ERIKA BOOTH, as Guardian of I.

USCA4 Appeal: 20-1023 Doc: 128 Filed: 06/14/2022 Pg: 1 of 103 ON REHEARING EN BANC PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 20-1001 BONNIE PELTIER, as Guardian of A.P., a minor child; ERIKA BOOTH, as Guardian of I.

ACCEPTED 03-14-00510-CV 3762693 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 1/14/201

ACCEPTED 03-14-00510-CV 4243321 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION ON DEFENDANTS PITNEY BOWES, INC. AND ICSN, INC.’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Docket No. 54) HILLMAN, District Judge. Introduction Plaintiff Genesis Strategies (“Genesis” or “Plaintiff’) filed a complaint against Pit-ney Bowes, Inc. (“Pitney Bowes”) and ICSN, Inc. (“ICSN”) (collectively “Defen*62</

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 23-1922 CLEMENTE PROPERTIES, INC.; 21 IN RIGHT, INC.; ROBERTO CLEMENTE, JR.; LUIS ROBERTO CLEMENTE; ROBERTO ENRIQUE CLEMENTE, Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. HON. PEDRO R. PIERLUISI-URRUTIA, Governor of Puerto Rico, in his official and individual capacity and as representative of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico; EILEEN M. VÉLEZ-VEGA, Secretary of

ACCEPTED 01-14-00880-cv FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 9/25/2015 3:28:27 PM

ORDER GARY R. BROWN, United State Magistrate Judge: Plaintiff Angel Dilonez, along with opt-in plaintiffs Aura Bueno, Carlos Dilone, and Norberto Bueno (collectively, “plaintiffs”), bring this action against their former employer, Fox Linen Service, Inc. (“Fox Linen”) and owner George Sundel (collectively, “defendants”). Plaintiffs, who were employed by defendants, allege that defendants violated

ORDER ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Re: Dkt. Nos. 37, 40 WILLIAM H. ORRICK, United States District Judge This case arises from the showing of a pay-per-view program at a commercial establishment. Plaintiff Joe Hand Promotions sues four defendants for displaying a program at a commercial establishment without proper licensing, alleging causes of action for: violation of 47 U.S.C.