Cases

(2008) J & J SPORTS PRODUCTIONS, INC., as Broadcast Licensee of the May 6, 2006 DeLaHoya/Mayorga Program, Plaintiff, v. Martha GUZMAN,[1] et al., Defendants. No. 06-CV-6840 (NGG)(RML). United States District Court, E.D. New York. April 4, 2008. MEMORANDUM & ORDER NICHOLAS G. GARAUFIS, District Judge. On May 8, 2007, this co

ORDER RE MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DAMAGES CHARLES R. BREYER, District Judge. This case arises out of the display of a pay-per-view program at a commercial es*911tablishment. J & J Sports Productions (“J & J”), the commercial distributor of certain programs, sued Joseph Coyne, Rafael Hernandez, and 2X Play LLC (collectively “Double P

Filed 9/8/21 Certified for Publication 9/10/21 (order attached) IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FIVE B312605 DR. V PRODUCTIONS, INC., (Los Angeles County Plaintiff and Respondent, Super. Ct. No.

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE PARAGON TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2023-1013-LWW ) TERENCE J. CRYAN, PHILIPP ) STRATMANN, PETER E. SLAIBY, ) CLYDE W. HEWLETT, NATALIE ) LORENZ-ANDERSON, DIANA G.

The absence of available documentation describing the relationship between the Plaintiffs and the Technology Defendants and their owners does not overcome the compelling circumstantial evidence that the Plaintiffs have alleged suggesting the existence of an employer-employee relationship. Because the Plaintiffs adequately allege that Synergy, Rivero, ECO IQ, Neilitz, Migo IQ, Kotthoff, and Leese employed them pursuant to the FLSA, this Court denied all moti

*210OPINION AND ORDER1 BESOSA, District Judge. Before the Court is the motion for reconsideration filed by defendants Mass Productions, Inc., Emanuel Logroo (“Logroo”), and Gilda Santini (collectively, “defendants”) (Docket No. 487), the plaintiffs opposition (Docket No. 492), and defendants’ reply to plaintiffs opposition

[Cite as State v. J.E., 2024-Ohio-4461.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT State of Ohio, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 22AP-623 (C.P.C. No. 20CR-5271) v. :

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER MARTHA VÁZQUEZ, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Plaintiff s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support [Doc. 49], APS’ [Albuquerque Public Schools]- Motion for Summary Judgment and Memorandum Brief in Support Thereof [Doc. 51], and Defendant’s two Motions in Limine [Docs. 50, 52], The Court, having considered the

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA J.G.G., et al., Plaintiffs, LIYANARA SANCHEZ, as next friend on behalf of FRENGEL REYES MOTA, et al., Civil Action No. 25-766 (JEB) Petitioners-Plaintiffs, v. DONALD J. TRUMP, et al., Respondents-Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION

Opinion issued November 7, 2023 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-23-00358-CV ——————————— IN THE MATTER OF J.J.T., A Juvenile On Appeal from the 313th District Court

598 F.Supp.2d 245 (2009) Jose Antonio CASIANO TORRES, Plaintiff v. DON KING PRODUCTIONS, INC., et al., Defendants. Civil No. 07-1714(SEC). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. February 25, 2009. Mauricio Hernandez-Arroyo, Mauricio Hernandez Arroyo Law Office, Ponce, PR, for Plaintiff. *246 Edna Hernandez-Arroyo, A

141 Nev., Advance Opinion Q3 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA OSCAR HERNANDEZ, No. 87794 Appellant, vs. THE HOME DEPOT, INC.: AND RIDGE FILED TOOL COMPANY, Respondents.

Filed 6/11/19; Certified for Publication 7/9/19 (order attached) IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION EIGHT KAREN HERNANDEZ et al., B281161 Plaintiffs and Appellants, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. Nos. BC513802, v.

STRATTON, J. *273This appeal arises from a wrongful death action brought by Karen Hernandez and Sergio Saravia (appellants), the parents of 13-year-old Jonathan Hernandez, after Jonathan was struck and killed by a school bus while riding his bicycle in Glendale. The school bus was owned by defendant and respondent First Student, Inc., and drive

ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO STRIKE AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES Anthony W. Ishii, SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE I. Introduction Plaintiff Marisol Gomez (“Plaintiff”) has filed separate motions, under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(f),1 to strike select affirmative defenses alleged by Defendant Bedrosian Farms, LLC (“Bedrosian”) (Doc. 11), and Defendant J. Jacobo Farm

CHIN, J. *108 **283 *263 Under Code of Civil Procedure

Case Number: 04-87-00122-CV 12/11/1990 Record returned to Court of Appeals 11/14/1990 Application for Writ of Error - Disposed proceeding denied 10/25/1990 Case forwarded to Court 10/25/1990 No description available. 10/18/1990 Reply filed 10/03/1990 Application for Writ of Error - Filed Defendant, EDCO Productions, Inc., appeals from a judgment, based on jury findings, awarding $67,815.00 to plaintiffs, Veronica Hernandez, widow of Johnny Hernandez, and the four children of Johnny and

MEMORANDUM OPINION 2 JAMES 0. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Deputy Sharkey’s Motion to Dismiss No. II: Dismissal of Fourteenth Amendment Substantive Due Process Claim, filed January 16, 2013 (Doc. 53)(“MTD”). The Court held a hearing on April 25, 2013. The primary issues are: (i) whether Plaintiff J.H., on behalf of her d

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT J. GUADALUPE MARQUEZ-REYES, No. 17-71367 Petitioner, Agency No. v. A205-490-228 MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, OPINION Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Orde

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT FINAL JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION JOSE E. MARTINEZ, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER came before the Court upon Plaintiff TracFone Wireless, Inc.’s (“TracFone”) Motion for Entry of an Order Entering Default Final Judgment and a Permanent Injunction (the “Motion”) (D.E. 22) pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(b) and 65 against Defendant Juan Hernandez