⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Ivan A Barrera”

Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2007-10-31 · Published · cited 0× · 215 Or. App. 701; 170 P.3d 1136; 2007 Ore. App. LEXIS 1538
PER CURIAM Conviction for possession of a controlled substance reversed and remanded. State v. Birchfield, 342 Or 624, 157 P3d 216 (2007); State v. Miller, 208 Or App 424, 144 P3d 1052, adh’d to on recons, 210 Or App 176, 149 P3d 1251 (2006). Remaining convictions affirmed and remanded for resentencing.
Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2007-05-23 · Published · cited 3× · 159 P.3d 1201; 213 Or. App. 56; 2007 Ore. App. LEXIS 736
159 P.3d 1201 (2007) 213 Or. App. 56 STATE of Oregon, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Carlos Ivan RODRIGUEZ-BARRERA, Defendant-Appellant. 04C44188, A125926. Court of Appeals of Oregon. Argued and Submitted February 28, 2007. Decided May 23, 2007. Brandon G. Williams, Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for appellant. With him o
People v. Barrerapublic domain
California Supreme Court · 2026-06-01 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. MARCOS ESQUIVEL BARRERA, Defendant and Appellant. S103358 Los Angeles County Superior Court PA029724 June 1, 2026 Justice Kruger authored the opinion of the Court, in which Chief Justice Guerrero an
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002-10-18 · Published · cited 0× · 51 F. App'x 812
ORDER AND JUDGMENT* HARTZ, Circuit Judge. *813After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. RApp. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without o
Colorado Court of Appeals · 2001-09-13 · Published · cited 7× · 39 P.3d 1205; 2001 Colo. J. C.A.R. 4592; 2001 Colo. App. LEXIS 1515; 2001 WL 1045621
39 P.3d 1205 (2001) D.C. CONCRETE MANAGEMENT, INC., and Rafael Sanchez, Plaintiffs-Appellants and Cross-Appellees, v. MID-CENTURY INSURANCE COMPANY, a California entity, Defendant-Appellee and Cross-Appellant. No. 99CA1424. Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. IV. September 13, 2001. Rehearing Denied December 6, 2001. *1206<
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2016-07-21 · Published · cited 15× · 830 F.3d 49; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 13328; 2016 WL 3923837
SELYA, Circuit Judge. The petitioner, Omar Ivan Alvizures-Gomes, seeks judicial review of a final order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the United Nations Convention Against Torture (CAT). Detecting no error, we deny the petition. The relevant facts are uncomplicated. The petit
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007-12-19 · Published · cited 14× · 511 F.3d 232; 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 29299; 2007 WL 4415463
511 F.3d 232 (2007) Dr. Daniel AYALA-RODRÍGUEZ; Priscilla Carrasquillo; Danellis Ayala-Carrasquillo; Dannis Ayala-Carrasquillo; Dennis Ayala-Carrasquillo, Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. Dr. Johnny RULLÁN, Secretary of the Health Department of Puerto Rico (HDPR); Dr. Heriberto Pagán-Sáez, Executive Director of the Medical Services Administration (ASEM); Dr. Edwin Miranda, Director of the Emergency Room of the San Juan Medical Center; Dr. Victor Medina
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014-05-09 · Published · cited 14× · 752 F.3d 412; 88 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 860; 2014 WL 1876519; 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 8792
CARL E. STEWART, Chief Judge: Defendant-Appellant Ted Brennan appeals the district court’s judgment in favor of Plaintiffs-Appellees Edward Colbert and Kenyon & Kenyon, L.L.P. on their oblique action. Because we conclude that we lack jurisdiction to consider his appeal, we DISMISS. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS There
District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1991-02-04 · Published · cited 10× · 756 F. Supp. 661; 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1668; 1991 WL 13540
756 F.Supp. 661 (1991) GEOFFREY, INC., Plaintiff, v. TOYS 'R US (NOSOTROS SOMOS LOS JUGUETES), INC., Robert Santiago, John Santiago and Angie Santiago, Defendants. Civ. No. 90-2406 (JP). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. February 4, 1991. *662 Iván Reichard, Reichard & Calaf, San Juan, P.R., for plaintiff.
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) · 2008-03-06 · Published · cited 0×
Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed March 6, 2008 Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed March 6, 2008. In The
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008-01-28 · Published · cited 88× · 514 F.3d 1224; 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 1799; 2008 WL 217364
514 F.3d 1224 (2008) Salome Melseio MONTANO CISNEROS, Divina Ramos Martinez, Petitioners, v. U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, Respondent. No. 07-11063. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. January 28, 2008. Leslie A. Diaz, H. Glenn Fogle, Jr., The Fogle Law Firm, LLC, Atlanta, GA, for Petitioners. Jesse M. Bless, David V. Bernal, Russell J.E. Verby, Anthon
Cruz v. Molinapublic domain
District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1992-07-29 · Published · cited 0× · 794 F. Supp. 465; 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11487; 1992 WL 186277
GENE CARTER, Chief Judge.1 ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO ALTER OR AMEND JUDGMENT Plaintiff in this action filed a timely motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e) to alter or amend judgment. In his motion, he urges the Court to reconsider its findings that he is not entitled to damages for mental anguish or for the expenses he alleged for repairs of Defendant’s house an
District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1999-07-31 · Published · cited 1× · 62 F. Supp. 2d 396; 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12898; 1999 WL 640101
62 F.Supp.2d 396 (1999) WILSHIRE CREDIT CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. G & C PLAZA INC., et al., Defendants. No. CIV. 98-2135(DRD). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. July 31, 1999. *397 Mildred Caban-Flores, Goldman Antonetti & Cordova, San Juan, PR, Ivan R. Fernandez-Vallejo, Rodriguez & Fernandez, San Juan,
Tribunal De Apelaciones De Puerto Rico/Court of Appeals of Puerto Rico · 2002-08-26 · Published · cited 0× · 8 T.C.A. 461; 2002 DTA 131
Arbona Lago, Juez Ponente *462TEXTO COMPLETO DE LA SENTENCIA Hechos La presente causa de acción trata sobre una reclamación de daños y perjuicios a raíz de un accidente automovilístico ocurrido el 7 de marzo de 1999 en el Expreso José de Diego (Dorado/Bayamón). Estuvieron envueltos dos autos, uno de ellos conducido por el codemanda
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007-07-17 · Published · cited 129× · 494 F.3d 213; 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 16940; 2007 WL 2042442
494 F.3d 213 (2007) Maria Aracelly LOPEZ DE HINCAPIE, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent. No. 06-2259. United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit. Submitted June 5, 2007. Decided July 17, 2007. *214 *215 L. Manuel Macias and Ilana Greenstein on
District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1986-04-02 · Published · cited 3× · 633 F. Supp. 24; 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27323
633 F.Supp. 24 (1986) FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. NORBERTO MEDINA REALTY CORP., et al., Defendants. Civ. No. 82-2985 (JAF). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. April 2, 1986. *25 Ivan Cintrón Campos, San Juan, P.R., for plaintiff. José L. Gandara, Bausa & Dávila, San Juan, P.R., for P
State v. Stokleypublic domain
Arizona Supreme Court · 1995-06-27 · Published · cited 83× · 898 P.2d 454; 182 Ariz. 505; 193 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 23; 1995 Ariz. LEXIS 63
182 Ariz. 505 (1995) 898 P.2d 454 STATE of Arizona, Appellee, v. Richard Dale STOKLEY, Appellant. No. CR-92-0278-AP. Supreme Court of Arizona, En Banc. June 27, 1995. *511 Grant Woods, Atty. Gen. by Paul J. McMurdie, Chief Counsel, Crim. Appeals Section, Phoenix, Eric J. Olsson, Tucson, for appellee. <
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005-03-30 · Published · cited 311× · 402 F.3d 398; 2005 WL 712367
BARRY, Circuit Judge. A motion to reopen a removal order issued in absentia must be filed within 180 days of the order. The primary issue before us, an issue of first impression, is whether the 180-day time limitation is mandatory and jurisdictional, or whether it is analogous to a statute of limitations and therefore can be equitably tolled. If it is the lat
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008-07-28 · Published · cited 7× · 534 F.3d 1320; 2008 WL 2880345
534 F.3d 1320 (2008) Adelina GARCIA; Antonio Garcia; Jeronimo Vargas-Vera; Efrain Aguilar; Paulina Aguilar; Adelaida Aguirre; Jose R. Aguirre; Salvador Almanza; Miguel Amaya; Rogelio Andrade; Jesus Anguiano; Efigenia Arana; Jose R. Arana; Ramon Arana; Alma Armendariz; Jorge L. Banda Valadez; Delfino Barragan; Lucia Barragan; Ramon P. Barragan; Holga Benitez; Baltazar Bonilla; Maria Guadalupe Bonilla; Catalina Bustillos; Bernardo Calderon; Etelvina Calder