Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Ivan A Barrera”
State v. Rodriguez-Barrerapublic domain
PER CURIAM Conviction for possession of a controlled substance reversed and remanded. State v. Birchfield, 342 Or 624, 157 P3d 216 (2007); State v. Miller, 208 Or App 424, 144 P3d 1052, adh’d to on recons, 210 Or App 176, 149 P3d 1251 (2006). Remaining convictions affirmed and remanded for resentencing.
State v. Rodriguez-Barrerapublic domain
159 P.3d 1201 (2007) 213 Or. App. 56 STATE of Oregon, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Carlos Ivan RODRIGUEZ-BARRERA, Defendant-Appellant. 04C44188, A125926. Court of Appeals of Oregon. Argued and Submitted February 28, 2007. Decided May 23, 2007. Brandon G. Williams, Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for appellant. With him o
People v. Barrerapublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. MARCOS ESQUIVEL BARRERA, Defendant and Appellant. S103358 Los Angeles County Superior Court PA029724 June 1, 2026 Justice Kruger authored the opinion of the Court, in which Chief Justice Guerrero an
United States v. Barrerapublic domain
ORDER AND JUDGMENT* HARTZ, Circuit Judge. *813After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. RApp. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without o
39 P.3d 1205 (2001) D.C. CONCRETE MANAGEMENT, INC., and Rafael Sanchez, Plaintiffs-Appellants and Cross-Appellees, v. MID-CENTURY INSURANCE COMPANY, a California entity, Defendant-Appellee and Cross-Appellant. No. 99CA1424. Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. IV. September 13, 2001. Rehearing Denied December 6, 2001. *1206<
Alvizures-Gomes v. Lynchpublic domain
SELYA, Circuit Judge. The petitioner, Omar Ivan Alvizures-Gomes, seeks judicial review of a final order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the United Nations Convention Against Torture (CAT). Detecting no error, we deny the petition. The relevant facts are uncomplicated. The petit
Ayala-Rodriguez v. Rullanpublic domain
511 F.3d 232 (2007) Dr. Daniel AYALA-RODRÍGUEZ; Priscilla Carrasquillo; Danellis Ayala-Carrasquillo; Dannis Ayala-Carrasquillo; Dennis Ayala-Carrasquillo, Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. Dr. Johnny RULLÁN, Secretary of the Health Department of Puerto Rico (HDPR); Dr. Heriberto Pagán-Sáez, Executive Director of the Medical Services Administration (ASEM); Dr. Edwin Miranda, Director of the Emergency Room of the San Juan Medical Center; Dr. Victor Medina
Edward Colbert v. Theodore Brennanpublic domain
CARL E. STEWART, Chief Judge: Defendant-Appellant Ted Brennan appeals the district court’s judgment in favor of Plaintiffs-Appellees Edward Colbert and Kenyon & Kenyon, L.L.P. on their oblique action. Because we conclude that we lack jurisdiction to consider his appeal, we DISMISS. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS There
756 F.Supp. 661 (1991) GEOFFREY, INC., Plaintiff, v. TOYS 'R US (NOSOTROS SOMOS LOS JUGUETES), INC., Robert Santiago, John Santiago and Angie Santiago, Defendants. Civ. No. 90-2406 (JP). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. February 4, 1991. *662 Iván Reichard, Reichard & Calaf, San Juan, P.R., for plaintiff.
Raymond Ladaniel James v. Statepublic domain
Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed March 6, 2008 Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed March 6, 2008. In The
Montano Cisneros v. US Atty. Gen.public domain
514 F.3d 1224 (2008) Salome Melseio MONTANO CISNEROS, Divina Ramos Martinez, Petitioners, v. U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, Respondent. No. 07-11063. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. January 28, 2008. Leslie A. Diaz, H. Glenn Fogle, Jr., The Fogle Law Firm, LLC, Atlanta, GA, for Petitioners. Jesse M. Bless, David V. Bernal, Russell J.E. Verby, Anthon
Cruz v. Molinapublic domain
GENE CARTER, Chief Judge.1 ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO ALTER OR AMEND JUDGMENT Plaintiff in this action filed a timely motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e) to alter or amend judgment. In his motion, he urges the Court to reconsider its findings that he is not entitled to damages for mental anguish or for the expenses he alleged for repairs of Defendant’s house an
Wilshire Credit Corp. v. G & C PLAZA INC.public domain
62 F.Supp.2d 396 (1999) WILSHIRE CREDIT CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. G & C PLAZA INC., et al., Defendants. No. CIV. 98-2135(DRD). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. July 31, 1999. *397 Mildred Caban-Flores, Goldman Antonetti & Cordova, San Juan, PR, Ivan R. Fernandez-Vallejo, Rodriguez & Fernandez, San Juan,
Vega Vega v. Cerezo de la Rosapublic domain
Arbona Lago, Juez Ponente *462TEXTO COMPLETO DE LA SENTENCIA Hechos La presente causa de acción trata sobre una reclamación de daños y perjuicios a raíz de un accidente automovilístico ocurrido el 7 de marzo de 1999 en el Expreso José de Diego (Dorado/Bayamón). Estuvieron envueltos dos autos, uno de ellos conducido por el codemanda
Lopez De Hincapie v. Gonzalespublic domain
494 F.3d 213 (2007) Maria Aracelly LOPEZ DE HINCAPIE, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent. No. 06-2259. United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit. Submitted June 5, 2007. Decided July 17, 2007. *214 *215 L. Manuel Macias and Ilana Greenstein on
ACCEPTED 15-25-00013-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 12:26 PM No. 15-25-00013-CV
633 F.Supp. 24 (1986) FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. NORBERTO MEDINA REALTY CORP., et al., Defendants. Civ. No. 82-2985 (JAF). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. April 2, 1986. *25 Ivan Cintrón Campos, San Juan, P.R., for plaintiff. José L. Gandara, Bausa & Dávila, San Juan, P.R., for P
State v. Stokleypublic domain
182 Ariz. 505 (1995) 898 P.2d 454 STATE of Arizona, Appellee, v. Richard Dale STOKLEY, Appellant. No. CR-92-0278-AP. Supreme Court of Arizona, En Banc. June 27, 1995. *511 Grant Woods, Atty. Gen. by Paul J. McMurdie, Chief Counsel, Crim. Appeals Section, Phoenix, Eric J. Olsson, Tucson, for appellee. <
BARRY, Circuit Judge. A motion to reopen a removal order issued in absentia must be filed within 180 days of the order. The primary issue before us, an issue of first impression, is whether the 180-day time limitation is mandatory and jurisdictional, or whether it is analogous to a statute of limitations and therefore can be equitably tolled. If it is the lat
Garcia v. Tyson Foods, Inc.public domain
534 F.3d 1320 (2008) Adelina GARCIA; Antonio Garcia; Jeronimo Vargas-Vera; Efrain Aguilar; Paulina Aguilar; Adelaida Aguirre; Jose R. Aguirre; Salvador Almanza; Miguel Amaya; Rogelio Andrade; Jesus Anguiano; Efigenia Arana; Jose R. Arana; Ramon Arana; Alma Armendariz; Jorge L. Banda Valadez; Delfino Barragan; Lucia Barragan; Ramon P. Barragan; Holga Benitez; Baltazar Bonilla; Maria Guadalupe Bonilla; Catalina Bustillos; Bernardo Calderon; Etelvina Calder