Cases

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent Westchester Medical Center dated September 7, 2010, which adopted so much of the decision of a hearing officer, made after a hearing pursuant to Civil Service Law § 75, as found the petitioner guilty of insubordination and misconduct, and terminated her employment as a nursing aide. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, the petition is denied, and

GLICKMAN, Associate Judge: Appellants Azariah Israel and Emanuel Jenkins were tried together before a jury for murders and other serious crimes committed in 2005 and 2006. The jury found Israel guilty on two counts of armed first-degree murder, three counts of armed assault with intent to kill, and related firearms charges, all in connection with a shooting of several individu

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

67 So.3d 707 (2011) Janice JENKINS, Robert Jenkins, Michael Kiper, James Chapel Baptist Church, Inc., Claude Spruel, Curtis W. Mimms and David Johnson v. The GRAY INSURANCE COMPANY and Wallace C. Drennan, Inc. No. 2011-CA-0035. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit. July 6, 2011. Rehearing Denied July 22, 2011. *

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND NON-TAXABLE EXPENSES DONALD M. MIDDLEBROOKS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS CAUSE is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Attorneys’ Fees and *1348Non-Taxable Expenses for the work performed by the ACLU’s National Prison Project (“NPP”) and by the ACLU of Florida (collectively, “ACLU

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determi*740nation of the respondent Michael D. Israel dated October 13, 2011, which adopted in part and rejected in part the recommendation of a hearing officer, made after a hearing pursuant to Civil Service Law § 75, finding the petitioner guilty of misconduct and/or incompetence, and terminated his employment as a Senior Psychiatric Aid.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent Westchester Medical Center, dated January 12, 2012, which adopted in part and rejected in part the recommendation of a hearing officer, made after a hearing pursuant to Civil Service Law § 75, finding the petitioner guilty of misconduct and/or incompetence, and terminated her employment as a Senior Nursing Aide. Adjudged that the determination is confirme

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determi*740nation of the respondent Michael D. Israel dated October 13, 2011, which adopted in part and rejected in part the recommendation of a hearing officer, made after a hearing pursuant to Civil Service Law § 75, finding the petitioner guilty of misconduct and/or incompetence, and terminated his employment as a Senior Psychiatric Aid.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent Westchester Medical Center, dated January 12, 2012, which adopted in part and rejected in part the recommendation of a hearing officer, made after a hearing pursuant to Civil Service Law § 75, finding the petitioner guilty of misconduct and/or incompetence, and terminated her employment as a Senior Nursing Aide. Adjudged that the determination is confirme

In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo No. 07-23-00132-CR THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLANT V. ISRAEL NAVARETTE, APPELLEE On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1 Lubbock County, Texas Tri

Jenkins v Alston (2018 NY Slip Op 04238) Jenkins v Alston 2018 NY Slip Op 04238 Decided on June 8, 2018 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law §

The review of administrative determinations in employee disciplinary cases made after a hearing under Civil Service Law § 75 is limited to a consideration of whether the determination was supported by substantial evidence (see CPLR 7803 [4]; 300 Gramatan Ave. Assoc. v State Div. of Human Rights, 45 NY2d 176 [1978]; Matter of Smith v Carter, 61 AD3d 982 [2009]). Here, there is substantial evidence in the record to support the determinatio

[Cite as Jenkins v. Jenkins, 2014-Ohio-4407.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT GREENE COUNTY HOFIT JENKINS : : Appellate Case No. 2014-CA-18 Plaintiff-Appellee : : Trial Court Case No. 2013-

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of Westchester County Health Care Corporation dated July 21, 2010, which adopted the recommendation of a hearing officer, made after a hearing pursuant to Civil Service Law § 75, finding the petitioner guilty of certain charges of misconduct and insubordination, and terminated her employment as a certified nursing assistant. Adjudged that the petition is granted, on the

Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed July 27, 2023 In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-22-00275-CR ISRAEL TORRES, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 230th District Court Harris County, Texas

KENNEDY, Circuit Judge, dissenting. The Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction1 (“Hague Convention”) exists to ensure the prompt return of children wrongfully retained to the state of the child’s habitual residence. Hague Convention, Preamble. According to the Convention, a retention is “wrongful” where: a) it is in breach of r

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 20-1602 Filed September 1, 2021 STATE OF IOWA, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. BRIANA NICOLE JENKINS, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, Brendan E. Greiner, District Associate Judge. Briana Jenkins appeals the revocation of her deferred judgment. AFFIR

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 File Name: 09a0225p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ X Petitioner-Appellant/Cross-Appellee, - HOFIT JENKINS,

72 P.3d 864 (2003) 139 Idaho 24 Joseph F. ISRAEL and Regina M. Israel, husband and wife, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Robert B. LEACHMAN and Lenore J. Leachman, husband and wife, and Leachman Family Trust with Robert B. Leachman and Lenore J. Leachman as Trustees, Defendants-Respondents. No. 28005. Supreme Court of Idaho, Boise, April 2003 Term. June 18, 20

912 A.2d 951 (2006) 2006 VT 78 Lisa MILLER-JENKINS v. Janet MILLER-JENKINS. Nos. 04-443, 05-030. Supreme Court of Vermont. August 4, 2006. Motion for Reargument Denied November 9, 2006. *955 Judy G. Barone of Readnour & Barone, Rutland, and Mathew D. Staver and Rena M. Lindevaldsen, Li