Cases

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-16-00020-CR Israel Gomez, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 299TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. D-1-DC-08-205656, HONORABLE KAREN SAGE, JUDGE PRESIDING ORDER

ACCEPTED 03-16-00020-CR 12540005 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT ISRAEL J. GOMEZ CRUZ, as Personal Representative of the ESTATE OF ISRAEL Z. GOMEZ-RODRIGUEZ, and MARGARITA CRUZ de GOMEZ, decedent’s widow, Appellants, v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP, Appellee. No. 4D18-178 [Ma

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

ORDER Israel Gomez-Astorga, a federal prisoner proceeding pro se, seeks a certificate of appealability (COA) to appeal the district court’s dismissal of his Writ of Habeas Corpus petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. He has also filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). We deny the application for COA, deny the motion to proceed IFP, and dismiss the matter.

MEMORANDUM ** The parties agree that the crime of false imprisonment under Cal.Penal Code § 236 is not a categorical crime of violence under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(l)(A)(ii). See United States v. Hernandez-Hernandez, 431 F.3d 1212, 1217 n. 5 (9th Cir.2005). Therefore, the district court plainly erred in relying solely on the facts recited in the presentence report to determine that Gomez-Alvarez’s co

91 F.Supp.2d 477 (2000) UNITED STATES of America, v. Israel GOMEZ-BORGES, Defendants. No. CR. 99-100(DRD). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. March 29, 2000. Antonio R. Bazan-Gonzalez, U.S. Attorney's Office District of P.R., Criminal Division, Hato Rey, PR, for plaintiff. Joseph C. Laws, Federal Public Defender Office, San Juan, PR, for defendant.

PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Israel Olascoaga-Gomez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Olascoaga-Gomez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relev

LUMBARD, Circuit Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part: I concur in the affirmance of Perrone’s convictions and in the remand to the district court for resentencing. I dissent from the reversal of Gomez’s convictions. Based on the proof before the jury, as is fully set forth in the majority opinion, I believe there was sufficient evidence to sup

LASKER, District Judge. Following our June 13, 1991 decision in this case, United States v. Perrone, 936 F.2d 1403 (2d Cir.1991), the United States petitioned for rehearing as to our treatment of Perrone’s conviction of conspiracy to manufacture narcotics pursuant to 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a) and 846 (1988). The petition was granted because it raised questions whic

People v Israel (2018 NY Slip Op 03856) People v Israel 2018 NY Slip Op 03856 Decided on May 30, 2018 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 43

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 22-3653 ___________________________ Israel Amador-Morales Petitioner v. Merrick B. Garland Resp

25-386 Lalama Gomez v. United States United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit August Term 2024 Argued: May 12, 2025 Decided: June 9, 2025 No. 25-386 MARIO LALAMA GOMEZ, Petitioner-Appellant,

CARL E. STEWART, Chief Judge: After a months-long investigation into hiring practices at Waste Management Incorporated ("WMI"), the Government charged Defendant-Appellant Israel Arguimides Martinez and several co-defendants with various immigration crimes stemming from their participation in efforts to recruit and retain undocumented immigrants for employment at WMI in Houston, Texas. M

ARTERTON, District Judge: *988Guillermo Gomez-Sanchez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the published decision by the Board of Immigration Appeals ("BIA" or "the Board") affirming the Immigration Judge's ("IJ") finding that Gomez-Sanchez is statutorily ineligible for withholding of removal because he was convicted of a

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County (Christopher Pizzolo, Ct. Atty. Ref.), dated March 31, 2015. The order, without a hearing, in effect, denied the mother’s motions for the issuance of an order, inter alia, making special findings so as to enable the subject child, Jose Fredy Garcia Sibrian, to petition the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services for special immigrant juvenile statu

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed March 29, 2023. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D21-1945 Lower Tribunal No. 13-37232 ________________ Israel Reyes, etc., et al., Appellants,

FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judge, concurring: I concur in the result, but not in all of the reasoning of the majority opinion. I concur in part I and in the portion of part II before IIA First. As to part IIA First (majority opinion at pages 7 to 8), I do not agree. The guideline definition indicates that it applies to forcible sex offenses, which include those where “consent ... is not legally valid.” USSG § 2L1.

ACCEPTED 13-15-00071-CR THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS FILED CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS IN THE 13TH COURT OF APPEALS