Cases

673 F.Supp.2d 1144 (2009) Louis DOODY, Plaintiff, v. PENGUIN GROUP (USA) INC., a Delaware corporation; Sandecker, RLLP, a Colorado Limited Liability Limited Partnership; Clive Cussler; Dirk Cussler; John Does 1-10, Jane Does 1-10; Doe Corporations 1-10; Does Partnerships 1-10; and Doe Associations 1-10, Defendants. Civil No. 08-00285 JMS/BMK. United States District Court, D. Hawaii.

HOWARD, Circuit Judge. These appeals present two complex questions of first impression: Does the Buy American Act (BAA), 41 U.S.C. §§ 8301-8305 (formerly codified at 41 U.S.C. §§ 10a-10d), preempt two Puerto Rico statutes? And if not, do those Puerto Rico statutes unconstitutionally interfere with Congress’s power to regulate foreign commerce? The distri

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ) IN RE DOLE FOOD CO., INC. ) CONSOLIDATED STOCKHOLDER LITIGATION. ) C.A. No. 8703-VCL ) ) IN RE APPRAISAL OF DOLE FOOD ) CONSOLIDATED COMPANY, INC. ) C.A. No. 9079-VCL )

456 F.Supp.2d 429 (2006) SOLUTIA INC., Plaintiff, v. FMC CORPORATION, Defendant. No. 04 Civ. 3842(WHP). United States District Court, S.D. New York. July 31, 2006. Order Denying Reconsideration November 7, 2006. *430 *431 *432

ACCEPTED 04-14-00829-cv 04-14-00829-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXA

*1247ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR COMPANY’S MOTION TO DISMISS FEDERICO A. MORENO, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE ■ This multidistrict' litigation (“MDL”) consolidates allegations of economic loss and personal injury related to airbags manufactured by defendants Takata Corporation and TK-Holdings and equipped in

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING SANCTIONS JAMES LAWRENCE KING, District Judge. One of the greatest transgressions that can be committed against a federal court is to knowingly perpetrate a fraud and to commandeer and manipulate the legal processes to do so. This case involves just such a fraud. What this Court described as the “legal finale to a three-year opera with a stunning libretto” more than

OPINION AND ORDER BROWN, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court on Defendants’ Motion (# 85) for Partial Summary Judgment and Plaintiffs’ Cross-Motion (# 91) for Partial Summary Judgment. The parties each seek summary judgment on Plaintiffs’ Claim One of the Third Amended Complaint (# 83) (that Defendants violated Plaintiffs’ right to procedural due process under the Fifth Amendment to the Uni

ACCEPTED 03-15-00528-CV 7458584 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan Syllabus Chief Justice: Justices: Elizabeth T. Clement Brian K. Zahra

Justice THOMAS delivered the opinion of the Court. *2372 In these consolidated cases, we decide whether the Government created lawful exemptions from a regulatory requirement implementing the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 (ACA),

39 F.Supp.2d 1048 (1998) UNITED STATES of America v. Michael D. ANDREAS; Mark E. Whitacre; Terrance S. Wilson; and Kazutoshi Yamada Defendants. No. 96 CR 762. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. December 30, 1998. *1049 *1050 *1051

OPINION LASTER, Vice Chancellor. The post-trial decision in this action held RBC Capital Markets, LLC (“RBC”) liable to a class of stockholders of Rural/Metro Corporation (“Rural” or the “Company”) for aiding and abetting breaches of fiduciary duty by the board of directors of Rural (the “Board”). In re Rural Metro Corp. S’holders Litig.,

OPINION NETTESHEIM, Judge. This ease is before the court on cross-motions for summary judgment. Plaintiffs Augusta Towing Service Co., Inc., and Columbia Marine Services, Inc. (“plaintiffs”), challenge the constitutionality of the Inland Waterways Revenue Act of 1978, Pub.L. No. 95-502, 92 Stat. 1696 (codified at 33 *162U.S.C. §§ 1801-1804 (1982),

OPINION JUNE L. GREEN, District Judge. Plaintiffs in this nationwide warranty action seek damages and equitable and declaratory relief against defendant for alleged defects in its motor vehicles. On behalf of a potential class of up to nine million parties, plaintiffs have moved for recertification or certification of four classes of Ford owners, pursuant to Rule 23, Fed.R.Civ.P., and the Magnuson-Moss Wa

Justice Souter delivered the opinion of the Court. The State of Ohio imposes its general sales and use taxes on natural gas purchases from all sellers, whether in-state or *282out-of-state, except regulated public utilities that meet Ohio’s statutory definition of a “natural gas company.” The question here is whether this difference in tax treatment be