Cases

ELIZABETH A. PICKETT, Judge. \ .FACTS Carl Jack was the manager of Anger No. 2, a convenience store in Evangeline Parish. He and his wife, Karriel Alfred, were working in the store on February 13, 2013, when, at approximately 8:30 p.m., three men came into the store demanding money from the cash register. One of the men wore a white hockey-type mask and had a handgun. He said that the man wi

Molina v Appula Mgt. Corp. (2026 NY Slip Op 01603) Molina v Appula Mgt. Corp. 2026 NY Slip Op 01603 Decided on March 19, 2026 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opini

ACCEPTED 15-25-00012-cv FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 3:13 PM No. 15-25-00012-CV

PAULINE NEWMAN, Circuit Judge. In this patent infringement action tried to a jury, the district court directed the grant of judgment as a matter of law in favor of the defendant American Cyanamid Company (“Cyanamid”), upon completion of the case in chief presented by the plaintiffs Allied Colloids Inc. and Allied Colloids Ltd. (collectively “Colloids”).

Opinion issued May 27, 2021 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-19-00336-CV ——————————— DEZZIE BRUMFIELD, JOE ADAMO, JULIA ADAMS, NANCY ALLEN, ANDREW ANDERSON, BEVERLY ANDERSON, ONYEMA ANOZIE, WHITLEY ARRINGTON, SHARON BACON, KOLAWOLE BAKARE, LONNIE C

No. 12 May 18, 2023 61 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON RON Adelsperger; Sally Adelsperger; Walter Arnold; Sandy Arnold; Larry Brewer; Marilyn Brewer; James Brown; Lonna Brown; Bill Burgess; Jane Burgess; Shirley Calkins; Jerry Christensen, aka Gerald Christenson; Cindy Christensen, aka Cynthia Evans-Christenson; Russell Cobb; Norma Cobb; Ron Ellis; Sallie Elli

ACCEPTED 15-25-00013-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 12:26 PM No. 15-25-00013-CV

97 N.Y.2d 178 (2001) 763 N.E.2d 1146 738 N.Y.S.2d 5 In the Matter of FELICITA LUNA, Appellant, v. DENNIS DOBSON, Respondent. Court of Appeals of the State of New York. Argued November 13, 2001. Decided December 13, 2001. *179 Michael D. Hess, Corporation Counsel of New York C

534 F.3d 1320 (2008) Adelina GARCIA; Antonio Garcia; Jeronimo Vargas-Vera; Efrain Aguilar; Paulina Aguilar; Adelaida Aguirre; Jose R. Aguirre; Salvador Almanza; Miguel Amaya; Rogelio Andrade; Jesus Anguiano; Efigenia Arana; Jose R. Arana; Ramon Arana; Alma Armendariz; Jorge L. Banda Valadez; Delfino Barragan; Lucia Barragan; Ramon P. Barragan; Holga Benitez; Baltazar Bonilla; Maria Guadalupe Bonilla; Catalina Bustillos; Bernardo Calderon; Etelvina Calder

21-2019 Bartlett v. Baasiri In the United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit August Term, 2022 No. 21-2019 ROBERT BARTLETT, TERREL CHARLES BARTLETT, LINDA JONES, SHAWN BARTLETT, MAXINE E. CROCKETT, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF THE ESTATE OF RICKY LEON CROCKETT, MARVISE L. CROCKETT, TRACIE ARSIAGA, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF THE ESTATE OF ROBERT R. ARSIAG

19-3970 Freeman v. HSBC Holdings PLC United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit August Term 2020 Argued: February 1, 2021 Decided: January 5, 2023 No. 19-3970 CHARLOTTE FREEMAN, for the Estate of BRIAN S. FREEMAN, KATHLEEN SNYDER, RANDOLPH FREEMAN,

OPINION SUE E. MYERSCOUGH, U.S. District Judge: This cause is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment (d/e 341/402) (Motion 341/402) and Defendant Dish Network L.L.C.’s (Dish) Motion for Summary Judgment (d/e 346) (Motion 346) (collectively the Motions). The Plaintiffs seek summary judgment on eleven of twelve claims alleged in the Second Amended Complaint and Demand for Jury Trial (d/

FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 1 2025 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT PEDRO VASQUEZ PERDOMO et al., No. 25-4312 Plaintiffs

9 A.3d 123 (2010) 196 Md. App. 254 Bryan SIVELLS v. STATE of Maryland. No. 1480, Sept. Term, 2009. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. December 2, 2010. *127 Vidya A. Mirmira (Williams & Connolley LLP, Washington DC, Paul B. DeWolfe, Public Defender, Baltimore, MD), on the brief, for appellant. <

Affirm in part; Reverse and Render in part; Remand and Opinion Filed August 13, 2013 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas __________________________________ NO. 05-12-00963-CV CITY OF DALLAS, TEXAS, Appellant V. ANTHONY ARREDONDO, CHARLES S. SWANER, JAM

Affirm in part; Reverse and Render in part; Remand and Opinion Filed August 13, 2013 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas __________________________________ NO. 05-12-00963-CV CITY OF DALLAS, TEXAS, Appellant V. ANTHONY ARREDONDO, CHARLES S. SWANER, JAM

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA TIMOTHY KARCHER, et al., Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. 16-232 (CKK) v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION (January 14, 2021) Plaintiffs are now seeking default judgment against the Islamic

REINHARDT, Circuit Judge, concurring: I, of course, concur without reservation in the opinion of the Court. I write separately only to add that I would also hold that the fundamental right to marriage, repeatedly recognized by the Supreme Court, in cases such as Loving v. Virginia, 388 U.S. 1, 87 S.Ct. 1817, 18 L.Ed.2d 1010 (1967), Zablocki v. Redhail, 434 U.S. 374, 98 S.Ct. 673, 54 L.Ed.2

BACHARACH, Circuit Judge. A group of employees filed class and collective actions against Tyson Foods, Inc., seeking unpaid wages for time spent on pre- and post-shift activities. After the employees obtained a sizeable verdict and fee award, 1 Tyson unsuccessfully moved for judgment as a matter of law. On appeal, Tys

ACCEPTED 14-14-00631-CV FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 12/29/2014